[projectaon] Re: Outstanding Errata Sprint (Week 6)
- From: Chris Neilson <crusty.chris@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:42:13 +1200
I also vote for 2 :)
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 09:22 +0100, David Davis wrote:
> I *think* that's a an exact summery, yes.
>
> I vote for option 2. :)
> --
> http://www.feline1.co.uk
>
> On Fri 24/06/11 8:28 AM , Timothy Pederick pederick@xxxxxxxxx sent:
>
>
> I'm seeing a fair bit of (what appears to me to be) arguing at
> cross-purposes. Since people said last time that my summary of
> the situation was helpful, I shall venture to do another one.
> This time, I'll just lay out the arguments that I think have
> been seriously proposed as people's preferred way of playing.
> 1. The "Joe Dever got it wrong" argument.
> * All bonuses for having Grand Weaponmastery
> with Bow should be +5.
> * All instances of +3 (and that one ad hoc +4)
> should be changed.
> 2. The "Grand Weaponmastery is intentionally worse"
> argument.
> * The Grand Weaponmastery with Bow +3 is
> correct.
> * Ad hoc +4 and +5 bonuses replace this.
> * +3 and +4 are worse than a loyal reader's +5,
> so the loyal reader gets to use their +5 at
> all times.
> 3. The "Grand Weaponmastery is the same as Weaponmastery"
> argument.
> * Grand Weaponmastery with Bow +3 is correct.
> * Ad hoc +4 and +5 bonuses replace this.
> * A loyal reader who got the Mentora +2 (which
> is a subtly different bonus) can add that to
> Grand Weaponmastery, giving them a +5 (or ad
> hoc +6 or +7).
> Correct?
>
> --
> Tim Pederick
~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
Other related posts:
