[projectaon] Re: Outstanding Errata Sprint (Week 6)
- From: "David Davis" <feline1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:03:30 +0100
well, maybe so!
It’s a few months since I raised the original errata -
I seem to recall it was one of those things where I was industriously filling
out my Action Chart for 20 minutes or so and then read that line and had to go
back and amend something, and thought “doh, I wish Joe had mentioned that
earlier”... but it’s not a huge big deal.
From: Timothy Pederick
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 5:57 PM
To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [projectaon] Re: Outstanding Errata Sprint (Week 6)
On 8 June 2011 00:15, David Davis <feline1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The reason I thought it was confusing is because, if you start from the
beginning of the Game Rules
in Captives of Kaag, and fill out your action chart, you don’t get told about
the bonuses when you’re
writing out your initial CS & EP – it’s mentioned in the bit at the end of
the disciplines, which is telling
about what bonuses you can look forward to in the *next* book if you complete
this one.
But then you would have exactly the same problem in every book, as they all
mention the bonus in the same place. If you read about the increase in
Plague-Lords of Ruel and then forgot to apply it in Captives of Kaag, there's
no reason to think you'd remember it between Captives of Kaag and Darke
Crusade. ;-)
--
Tim Pederick
Other related posts:
