On 14/03/13 09:53, Jonathan Blake wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Chris Neilson <crusty.chris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Actually thats an interesting point. By having access to the magic Spear you must also have taken the Sommerswerd by the time you finished the book (didnt actually think of that). However, the wording ( http://www.projectaon.org/en/xhtml/lw/02fotw/discplnz.htm) implies that you can opt to not take the Sommerswerd on later non-Grandmaster adventures. So I think we can safely assume that you could have either the Magic Spear or the Sommerswerd or both for any book after 02fotw (but before 13tplor). the only books (01-24) that contain the text "Helghast" are: $ grep -ril Helghast * | sed 's#/.*##' | uniq 02fotw 03tcok 08tjoh 14tcok 19wb So it appears the time this issue should be relevant is 03tcok and 08tjoh as Ben mentioned. Heres two problematic sections: http://www.projectaon.org/en/xhtml/lw/03tcok/sect328.htm http://www.projectaon.org/en/xhtml/lw/03tcok/sect170.htm Both of which require you to specifically have the Sommerswerd to survive an insta-death.Any appetite for a footnote in these sections? While you can't leave the Sommerswerd in safe keeping, it is possible for the player to drop it. Maybe they want to challenge themselves to play the books without the Sommerswerd? Or maybe they simply don't realize its value at first? Anyway, it is conceivable that a player who once possessed the Sommerswerd to now only possess the Magic Spear.
We should treat it the same way we do http://www.projectaon.org/en/xhtml/lw/08tjoh/sect60.htm However, my preference would be to alter the original text to reflect the other items capable of harming a Helghast (maybe list them in parentheses prefaced with "or alternatively posses at least one of the following items") rather than a footnote.
Being consistent is more important though.