RE: How do you conduct technical interviews ?

  • From: "Henry Poras" <henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'Oracle-L'" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:37:50 -0400

I'd drop the experience part too. I've worked with DBA's with 5 years, 10
years experience who learnt everything they knew in their first 3-6 months.
I've worked with DBA's with less than 1 year experience who were great and
knew a lot about handling problems. It all comes down to the person. In my
opinion using OCP and experience as hiring criteria is just a CYA thing
(it's not my fault they didn't work out, they had OCP and 10 years of
experience). Experience (and even OCP) can be of benefit, but until you know
more about the candidate you just can't tell. 
 
I like open ended questions (on going work issues???) just to see how they
would approach the problem, what different options they are aware of. 
 
Henry

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Robertson Lee - lerobe
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 10:58 AM
To: Oracle-L
Subject: RE: How do you conduct technical interviews ?


What about 5 years minimum experience and no OCP ? :-)

  _____  

From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Andrew Kerber
Sent: 14 August 2008 15:49
To: jason arneil; Oracle-L
Subject: Re: How do you conduct technical interviews ?


I agree on the OCP thing.  I dont really want to start the whole OCP debate
again, but a good rule of thumb (to me at least) would be OCP + 5 years
experience (minimum) as a DBA=good candidate, OCP with less than 5 years
experience, still a rookie DBA, but good at memorizing stuff.


On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 8:32 AM, jason arneil <jason.arneil@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


You have to draw a line somewhere on the memorization piece.  I might ask
the interviewee to name a few background processes in the Oracle database on
*nix, but I wouldnt necessarily expect him to go into detail about what each
process does.  

A general answer would be sufficient, for example pmon monitors processes
running in the database.  If the candidate needed highly detailed
information, I would expect (and want) him to look it up.  In my opinion,
the ability to find an answer to something that he doesn't know the answer
to, or to check on what he thinks is the answer before he does something, is
vital.




Totally agree that it is better finding someone who displays the correct
thought processes rather than knowing a particular fact/bit of trivia. 

In fact in some ways this argument can be deployed against the whole OCP
circus as well. Some of the worst candidates I have seen have come clutching
an OCP.

Though, of course there are many good people with them too, but I suspect
these people would shine out without it as well.

cheers,

jason.

--
http://jarneil.wordpress.com
 





-- 
Andrew W. Kerber

'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'






-- 
Andrew W. Kerber

'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'

*************************************************************************

The information contained in this communication is confidential, is

intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be

legally privileged.



If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 

hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this

communication is strictly prohibited.



If you have received this communication in error, please resend this

communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy

of it from your computer system.



Thank you.

*************************************************************************

Other related posts: