RE: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS

  • From: "Leandro Guimaraes Faria C. Dutra" <ldutra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 17:23:23 -0300

oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx gravou em 2006-04-07 15:43:44:

> I'm choking on my Bier, Jared! Anyone with intimate knowledge of what
> Operating System support a GOOD, boutique port of Oracle relies on knows
> all too well that not even Oracle Corp has managed to influence the
> Linux Kernel sufficiently!  Some of the complete junk they are
> mainlining
> is astounding, and the motives for acceptance of same is generally a bit
> dubious.

        There are usually good rationales, which maybe are not good for 
Oracle specifically.

        If you want a more conservative approach, you still have the 
Unices, with which GNU/Linux is interoperable.  With MS, you're stuck.


> The majority of Linux revenue is desktop, and it shows. 'nuff said. It
> is a "good enough" situatation I feel.

        This is by design.  Linus feels the desktop stresses the kernel 
mores and pushes it further, harder.  Feel free to substitute Unix if you 
think like it: they are all open systems, more or less.


-- 
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
Administrador de Bases de Dados      +55 (11) 4390 5383
Toyota do Brasil Ltda              ldutra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
São Bernardo do Campo, SP                        BRASIL
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: