Re: 10g RAC -- Multiple DB's and mixed OS
- From: "Jared Still" <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Kevin Closson" <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 12:21:33 -0700
Ok, possibly naive on my part, but Jeff doesn't seem to quite agree with
you.
And I'm still curious about the other half: how much influence can be
exerted over windows development?
Windows may be more stable than in the past, but it still has warts.
* drive letters
* very non-scriptfriendly commands
* the shell sucks
* the robust builtin in pipes are nearly useless from the command line
* did I mention drive letters?
* services cannot be counted on to start reliably on reboot
On 4/7/06, Kevin Closson <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> >>Those same types of customers could easily get involved with
> Linux development
> and participate in the kernels future.
>
>
> I'm choking on my Bier, Jared! Anyone with intimate knowledge of what
> Operating System support a GOOD, boutique port of Oracle relies on knows
> all too well that not even Oracle Corp has managed to influence the
> Linux Kernel sufficiently! Some of the complete junk they are
> mainlining
> is astounding, and the motives for acceptance of same is generally a bit
> dubious.
>
> The majority of Linux revenue is desktop, and it shows. 'nuff said. It
> is a "good enough" situatation I feel.
>
> I think the age-old "world is flat" view of Windows is
> just that. Now, the "fit" of Oracle software on Windows is
> ripe for criticism.
>
--
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
Other related posts:
