oops... I read 512MB... I was wondering what someone was trying to do assembling with such little ram :D In the case of 512GB I would guess <24 hours... On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Peter <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > Evan - Perhaps you miss-read Ganga's email? Or maybe I am... > > If the miramem estimate (about 70GB) is right, he should be fine with > 512GB of RAM (that's a lot more more than I have access to!). > > Based on Evan's time of 7 hours for 8 million Solexa reads, I think > Ganga should try it overnight and see. If it is still running, I think > from the log files would be possible to give an estimate of the > required run time. > > Peter > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Evan <evan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Last run I did with 8m solexa 60bp reads on normal took just under 7 > hours > > with 67+GB of ram and once you run out of ram your computer has to use > the > > hard drive which is 1000 times slower. > > > > I think its safe to say with your assembly and hardware you would be > looking > > at months (?years possibly?) > > > > According to this site > > > http://www.terryscomputertips.com/computers/speed-of-virtual-memory-versus-ram/ > > it is a difference of 1,300,000 x slower > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Ganga Jeena <ganga.jeena@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> > >> I am trying to do assembly of 8 million reads with mira > >> Configuration of system is as follows: > >> 512 GB RAM > >> 8 hexa-core processors > >> > >> miramem gives me a memory estimate of 66.6 GB. > >> How to get the time-estimate for assembly of data on my system. > >> Regards, > >> Ganga Jeena > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk > mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please > visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html >