[mira_talk] Re: Regarding Time-estimate of mira
- From: Sven Klages <sir.svencelot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: mira_talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:34:44 +0100
2010/12/22 Ganga Jeena <ganga.jeena@xxxxxxxxx>
> Thanks Michael,
> The Log Directory in assembly folder is 500 GB
> and we have just 270 GB in home.
> We are only left with oprtion of NFS ,
> But i don't get it why should NFS take such lot of time as its still using
> same resources.
> that way i won't be able to complete my assembly ever.
> Regards,
> Ganga Jeena
>
That's the nature of NFS ... heavy IO on NFS mounts is never a good idea :-)
We are running various 32-48 core systems with 128-256G RAM, and all
systems used
for assemblies (no matter if I use MIRA or other assemblers) do have enough
local diskspace
attached for "typical" assembly tasks, usually more than 3TB. This is not
really a matter of cost.
As we run our local storage in RAID5 SSDs are not an option, as this would
be indeed a cost factor :-)
Just my 2p,
Sven
Other related posts:
