[mira_talk] Re: Regarding Time-estimate of mira
- From: Ganga Jeena <ganga.jeena@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: mira_talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:23:18 +0530
Thanks Bastien,
Regards,
Ganga Jeena
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Bastien Chevreux <bach@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Dienstag 21 Dezember 2010 Ganga Jeena wrote:
> > I had just 270GB on home and log files generated exceeded this.
> > So I had to run it on NFS mount (3TB ), for which I got the warning that
> it
> > wud reduce the speed by factor of 10.
> > It has already been 4 days and yet the program is in Pass 1.
> >
> > I have 454 data with avg size 380, input 8 million reads, how much
> faster
> > wd running on home|headnode have been?
>
> Factor 2 to 3 is realistic with MIRA versions >=3.2.0, i.e. a slow down of
> 3
> to 5 compared to local disk.
>
> > As far as I have been observing it, though given an option for 30
> > processors, it had just used 25 for skim, for rest , it has been using
> max
> > 1 processor and 25-65 % RAM, if thats the status, How should running on
> > head node make a difference to speed and if it does by what time can i
> > expect my assembly to complete.
>
> As written in earlier mail: no time estimates possible.
>
> B.
>
> --
> You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk
> mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please
> visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html
>
Other related posts:
