--- John McCreery <john.mccreery@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 7/27/06, Teemu Pyyluoma <teme17@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On a more somber note, has it occured to any > theorists > > of asymmetrical warfare, that asymmetrical war can > not > > by definition be won and therefore will never end? > > > > Not so. There is a tried and true method with > numerous historical > precedents. It's called genocide. > > There lies the rub. We're not talking about > reprisals of the Nazis in > Czechoslovaka sort, on a 10 for one or even 100 for > one scale. We are > talking about Cato, "Carthago delenda est." Or the > entrepreneurs who > distributed blankets infected with smallpox to > American Indians. > I was assuming that part of the asymmetry is the dominant military force showing some restraint, but you are of course absolutely correct both historically and theoretically. Yours, Teemu Helsinki, Finland __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html