• From: "Judith Evans" <judithevans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:52:35 +0100

> > Eric: The correct term is "unlawful enemy combatant," which I
omitted in
> > my first post and corrected in my second. An "enemy
combatant" per se is
> > subject to Geneva Convention rules.

My apologies for failing to note the terminology.

Are there any lawful "enemy combatants" in the Long War On Terror
(formerly GWOT)?

Are the "unlawful enemy combatants" to be accorded (by the US)
the rights owed to them under the Fourth Geneva Convention?

Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK

To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: