On 2006-08-13 at 16:51:36 [+0200], Simon Taylor <simontaylor1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Another interesting discussion on the forums was about the symbol for > > > preferences: > > > Should we stick with the tick mark, use a slider (reference Stippi's > > > set), a > > > spanner (reference Dropline Neu), or something different? > > > > I have done a couple of improvements to my set, among them that I > > switched to > > the spanner. It has the clearest silhouette and the association to > > "tweaking > > something" is very strong. I'll send my new icons as soon as I have worked > > some more on the Trash icon. > > Aww, just as I was about to say "I like stippi's slider"! A spanner to me > suggests more repairing than tweaking - a slider seems to suggest more of a > personal adjustable preference that you're actually allowed to modify. > Maybe you can tweak the performance of your car with a spanner, but most > drivers would shy away from doing that as it's not officially supported. > Stick a "car performance" slider on the dashboard though and people would > be much happier in the knowledge the manufacturer intends them to adjust > the settings to their liking. Sorry that the metaphor got somewhat > stretched in the middle of that sentence! I totally agree with you. BUT :-). The slider doesn't have a good silhouette at all (unfortunately). My girldfriend said she recognized the spanner right away, and figured what the purpose was, while she didn't recognize the slider. > On the voting thing, I'm not sure a vote is particularly helpful at all > really. Comments that can somehow be linked to each set might be more > helpful (and maybe people could then vote to agree with certain comments?) Between the complicated-ness of this suggestion, and the simplicity of "just voting", I think the rating thing that we are establishing is a good compromize. > For example, "I dislike the way the shadow is cut off in stippi's > application icon". (And in the interest of balance "I really like stippi's > set overall, particularly the perspective used in the icons") Ah yeah, forgot to mention I will improve that too... :-) Best regards, -Stephan