Hi Niels, "Niels Reedijk" <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2008/4/8, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Thanks, I might have missed something before, but why did you need > > to > > do all that work then? I thought it was especially wanted to have > > a > > single sign-on for the whole website. > > At least that was the outcome of previous questionnaires, and I am > > very > > much in favor of that. > I know that there is a certain convenience. I have hacked on enabling > us to use both solutions. So we would be able to flawlessly switch to > either mode. > > The thing is that we are in the process of moving to another webhost > (I don't know if this has been said this explicitly on this list). > Actually, I think it is better to say we are investigating switching > to another web host, the actual move still has to be determined. > Nevertheless, pending reliability and security, it might be better - > as Jorge pointed out - to break this interdependence for reliability > reasons. Also, the current solution is (as will be the future > shared-login solution) a custom work of art, which means that > upgrading software means porting the tools again. I cannot promise to > be around forever, so that is something to keep in mind. > > Nevertheless, both options remain open. Okay, if that is just supposed to be a temporary solution, I'm perfectly fine with it, too. I'm looking forward to move to the ICS server. I hope we have a some kind of repository where those custom stuff is going to be put in? Bye, Axel. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- haiku-web@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Haiku Web & Developer Support Discussion List