[haiku-development] Re: Moving away from Subversion (pt 3)

  • From: Wim van der Meer <wpjvandermeer@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:35:40 +0900

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * Wim van der Meer <wpjvandermeer@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb:
>
>> Personally I don't like the dictator style workflow that the
>> linux kernel has. Haiku's mentor style workflow where developers
>> make commits that are commented on by others is much more
>> friendly and I don't see why there is a need to change that.
>
> What's the exact difference between LT's and mentors ?
> Why not just letting some LT's also work as mentors together
> with "lower" devs in the same branches ? Or maybe even set up
> mentoring groups which have their own repo or namespace ?

The difference (as I see it) is that LT's have a dictator above them,
while mentor's do not. Also everyone can be a mentor if he so chooses,
but LT is a more formal role (unless we want to formalize the mentor
role?). IMO, with a small (active) group of developers it doesn't make
a lot of sense to me to use too many formal sub-roles. But please
correct me if I am wrong.

-- 
Wim van der Meer
\/\///\/\

Other related posts: