On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Wim van der Meer <wpjvandermeer@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb: > >> Personally I don't like the dictator style workflow that the >> linux kernel has. Haiku's mentor style workflow where developers >> make commits that are commented on by others is much more >> friendly and I don't see why there is a need to change that. > > What's the exact difference between LT's and mentors ? > Why not just letting some LT's also work as mentors together > with "lower" devs in the same branches ? Or maybe even set up > mentoring groups which have their own repo or namespace ? The difference (as I see it) is that LT's have a dictator above them, while mentor's do not. Also everyone can be a mentor if he so chooses, but LT is a more formal role (unless we want to formalize the mentor role?). IMO, with a small (active) group of developers it doesn't make a lot of sense to me to use too many formal sub-roles. But please correct me if I am wrong. -- Wim van der Meer \/\///\/\