Adrien Destugues wrote: > > Are either of these being worked on? It seems that 6194 could be > > partially addressed (at least short term) by using the a font that > > displays the Korean, Chinese and Japanese selections in > > ReadOnlyBootPromt correctly, even if that font was only used to > > display those selections... > > Unfortunately, in Unicode some glyphs for Chinese and Japanese use the same > codepoints, but each language wants them to be rendered differently. This > means we have to use a different font for each language. Really? I thought Unicode was all about mapping codepoints uniquely to characters (not glyphs, BTW). CU, Ingo