On 2011-06-11 at 22:48:39 [+0200], Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > Adrien Destugues wrote: > > > Are either of these being worked on? It seems that 6194 could be > > > partially addressed (at least short term) by using the a font that > > > displays the Korean, Chinese and Japanese selections in > > > ReadOnlyBootPromt correctly, even if that font was only used to > > > display those selections... > > > > Unfortunately, in Unicode some glyphs for Chinese and Japanese use the > > same > > codepoints, but each language wants them to be rendered differently. This > > means we have to use a different font for each language. > > Really? I thought Unicode was all about mapping codepoints uniquely to > characters (not glyphs, BTW). That's where the problem lies. For the same character, Chinese and Japanese people expect a different representation (or glyph). So the font needs to be different in order to do the right thing, because the character alone isn't enough information in that case. -- Adrien.