"Ingo Weinhold" <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > Adrien Destugues wrote: > > > Are either of these being worked on? It seems that 6194 could be > > > partially addressed (at least short term) by using the a font > > > that > > > displays the Korean, Chinese and Japanese selections in > > > ReadOnlyBootPromt correctly, even if that font was only used to > > > display those selections... > > Unfortunately, in Unicode some glyphs for Chinese and Japanese use > > the same > > codepoints, but each language wants them to be rendered > > differently. This > > means we have to use a different font for each language. > Really? I thought Unicode was all about mapping codepoints uniquely > to characters > (not glyphs, BTW). It definltely is, and I'm quite certain this problem doesn't exist (or else we could discard our font overlays anyway). Bye, Axel.