[geocentrism] Re: The Big Bang
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jandj.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:27:39 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glover, Rob" <Rob.Glover@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 2:34 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: The Big Bang
>
> The problem with this approach is twofold. Firstly, if there is real
> intelligent design there, scientific research will verify it.
Archaeologists
> can tell, usually quite easily, if a block of stone is artificially shaped
> or not. If God hid an unambigious message to us in DNA, drew a blueprint
in
> the cosmic microwave background, or hid a passage of the Bible codified
> inside PI, that would be unambiguous evidence. But of course that would
deny
> faith.
That's what I call just a tad arrogant! Do you really believe that science
can prove or disprove intelligent design (a euphemism for God)? Do you think
that a computer could ever be made that would be able to verify the
existence of its human creator?
OK so one day science is able to prove that God exists, then what?
I'm sorry Rob but you just don't have any concept of the awsomeness of God.
To you it is something for you to do research on. As I said in my other
e-mail you are basically blind to this concept and it is beyond your ability
to grasp. Don't feel bad about though.
To illustrate this point I once got in touch with the National Institute for
the Blind. I spoke to them about a process I had developed that would enable
blind people to 'see' photos or paintings by touch. It was a photographic
process that converted the picture into relief lines that could be felt with
the fingers. The example I was using was a picture of the rear of a house
that had a patio. The patio slabs reduced in size the further they were
away, perspective. When I described this process to the NIB they thought it
was excellent, but only for people who were at one time sighted. You cannot
describe distance to someone who has never been able to see. All they can
perceive is what they can touch; they are totally unable to visually
comprehend it's shape. Their comprehension is limited to touch only.
Jack Lewis
Other related posts:
