that is only on 23h 56 min intervals... see the las diagram i gave you Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Steven J Look at the larger of the two panels in the attachment. You will see that all the sidereal period points are looking at a fixed position in the sky thus no change will be observed. Also, note where the observer would be standing if he had his back to the axis of (ecliptic) revolution -- facing outwards. This only happens -- as Philip S has stated -- at midnight. Paul D ----- Original Message ---- From: Steven Jones <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, 3 November, 2007 5:44:18 PM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts (Supplementary) Paul Deema wrote: Philip S What is HS -- helio-stationary? Steven J No -- Philip is correct concerning annual revolution (not rotation!) . Only at midnight is the Sun at your back when looking 'out'. But if you are looking 'out', the star trails you will record will not be circles -- they will be basically straight parallel lines. What you see depends on your latitude. Paul D You can't use a 24 hour period to perform this experiment, because the Earth has rotated 4 minutes. ----- Original Message ---- From: Steven Jones <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, 3 November, 2007 1:58:43 PM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts (Supplementary) Phillip Stott wrote: > Consider this from HS perspective > > Nightly rotation. Observer looks out with his back to axis of > rotation. Take snapshots every few minutes. Star trails observed. > > Annual rotation. Observer must again have his back to tha axis of > rotation, but the rotation of earth complicates the motion, now only > at midnight does the observer have his back to the axis of rotation. > So take a snapshot each midnight. Star trails observed. No, it should be a snapshot every 23h 56m. Steven. > > GS view exactly as HS but relative motion explanation. > > Philip Stott > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* j a <mailto:ja_777_aj@xxxxxxxxx> > *To:* geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > *Sent:* Friday, November 02, 2007 4:24 PM > *Subject:* [geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts > (Supplementary) > > Paul, > > As I said in another post, I cannot see how pointing the camera in > any particular direction would affect what is recorded. What I > have since been working on is the fact that the camera is not > moving with the axis of rotation for the annual trail but is for > the nightly trail. I am trying to get a grip on how this effects > what we should expect to see. > > JA > > > > */Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>/* wrote: > > > J A -- was my explanation of the incorrectness of your very > elaborate illustration lacking in some manner in your > estimation? I think this is important. > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.16/1102 - Release Date: > 10/31/2007 4:38 PM > --------------------------------- National Bingo Night. Play along for the chance to win $10,000 every week. Download your gamecard now at Yahoo!7 TV. --------------------------------- National Bingo Night. Play along for the chance to win $10,000 every week. Download your gamecard now at Yahoo!7 TV.