If as Paul affirms, and Neville could correct hin, we only have 10 or so people on this list, of what value to the human clan is the enormous theoretical ideas that we discuss here. Don't we deserve a larger audience? Hold that thought, Phil, as I apply it to the GWW book. The Net audience will always be small, transient and fleeting, and our “ enormous theoretical ideas(??)” will melt away in time as the morning dew in the noonday Sun.The content here will always be chaotic and disorganized, subject to the whim of each member. A book solves these three problems, with * permanence in time, a legacy to future generations, * access to world-wide readership. * organized content I feel like as though more than a years work has been an anormous waste of time; notwithstanding how much personal ego massaging I might have gotten out of it, plus some enlightening stimulation of my thought processes, which have in many ways maybe put me in a better position of comprehending this world in which we live, and the mysteries of science which control it, I nevertheless see it as perhaps worthwhile and not such a waste, given the opportunity so gracefully by our moderator Dr. Jones, to now and again show that all is not as the Protestant Oral Tradition teaches, to those of our separated bretheren outside of the graces of the Universal church of Jesus christ. Who knows in the future, what changes your and my occasional inputs may have had in bringing to the total truth of Jesus to one or all of our correspondents, that in the light of future events, they may receive the light of faith. To God, no amount of years of work towards the salvation of even just one soul is wasted. Again, let’s carry that thought forward. A book is a deposit for the future, a virtual time capsule. Today we read the thoughts of the Ancients, Aristotle etc., because they committed their ideas to writing. Imagine if we relied on oral tradition to learn what is now in The Book. My fancy is that GWW may not realistically lead to any MS response or mindset conversion in my lifetime, but in the future some young scientist, with divine guidance, free of senior scientist’s paradigm paralysis, will use GWW as a tool to overthrow the modernist heresy of HC and AC. In some way GWW is a seed planted now to be harvested in the unknown future. Ok so now to my questions. If the answers are not already in GWW, you have my permission to put them there. No way – then you get a royalty and a share of our megabucks income. :-) Not wanting to contaminate the excellent prose, I will put them in another post to arrive later. Phil . hic up... Over the course of our long communication history, I have learned to note if your posting time corresponds to the Aussie happy hour(s). :-) Pax Christi vobiscum, Robert B