To whom it may concern While Philip M has presumed autonomously upon my concurrence, From philip madsen Wed Jul 4 08:38:56 2007, he has presumed, to very close limits, correctly. Regarding Neville J's comments (GWW) From Neville Jones Wed Jul 4 14:36:04 2007 I would like to add this. Yes it's difficult to swim against the current but that is as it should be. If you wish to overturn the accumulated body of knowledge and understanding in any field, then you must be prepared for a long hard struggle. The alternative is to have the entrenched jury accept lightly your revised views, albiet with copious supporting documentation and reasoning -- along with the views (no doubt also accompanied by copious supporting evidence) equally with all the other dissenters. This would be disastrous and is no doubt the reason for things being as they are. The former course demonstrates negative feedback (stability) the latter, positive feedback (need it be stated -- instability). Regarding remuneration for one's efforts. Essentially market forces are going to rule. In this arena, the number of active participants -- off the top of my head -- would not exceed 10, thus the maximum capital returns are trivial when compared to the wider -- world -- market. I would have thought that it would be very cheap advertising to answer all questions directly. Paul D ____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo!7 Mail has just got even bigger and better with unlimited storage on all webmail accounts. http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/unlimitedstorage.html