[geocentrism] Re: Aspden effect and Aether.
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 07:26:45 +1000
number of active participants -- off the top of my head -- would not exceed
10,......
thus the maximum capital returns are trivial when compared to the wider --
world -- market. I would have thought that it would be very cheap advertising
to answer all questions directly.
Paul D
And Neville said, correctly, or we can pull together a bit more and show some
enthusiasm.
Neville.
And I say: I agree with both statements, except that it would be foolish to
support anything, of which one was not entirely convinced was true.
There ae many elements of GWW that I did not agree with. Assumptions and
presumptions, common to the method of errors of MS literature. So many, that
long ago I gave up the work of providing a list of criticisms.
Longer ago I followed an internet debate wherein Robert Sungenis defended a
challenge he made against all comers. As far as I was concerned, he failed in
that endeavour with one agnostic participant. (I don't know whether he got the
money) He did not convince me, and even though I agreed with the geocentric
position, his evidence was insufficient to convince. Indeed no-one, not even my
self , can present sufficient evidence to make Geocentrism a certainty. We have
been at it here for long enough and are still in the dark.
It is not good to support financially the promotion of any work that has
sufficient faulty reasoning , that it is more likely to do harm than good,
simply for the reason that I agree with or was sympathetic to the overall
objective. I would quickly give up a carton of beer to give Robert a feed, but
he never indicated that he was hungry.
Nevilles case was different. It was not a book. It was as far as I could tell
a PC programme.. Something I have never worked with, and quite candidly is
outside my abilities to understand evaluate or ever use. Like the heavy math
stuff, I avoid any discussion on it. Neville, I am as enthusiastic as they come.
Lets get on with the work.. We need now to have proof by experiment the Aspden
effect before getting into the wheres and whys of it.
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Deema
To: Geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 2:48 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Aspden effect and Aether.
To whom it may concern
While Philip M has presumed autonomously upon my concurrence, From philip
madsen Wed Jul 4 08:38:56 2007, he has presumed, to very close limits,
correctly.
Regarding Neville J's comments (GWW) From Neville Jones Wed Jul 4 14:36:04
2007 I would like to add this. Yes it's difficult to swim against the current
but that is as it should be. If you wish to overturn the accumulated body of
knowledge and understanding in any field, then you must be prepared for a long
hard struggle. The alternative is to have the entrenched jury accept lightly
your revised views, albiet with copious supporting documentation and reasoning
-- along with the views (no doubt also accompanied by copious supporting
evidence) equally with all the other dissenters. This would be disastrous and
is no doubt the reason for things being as they are. The former course
demonstrates negative feedback (stability) the latter, positive feedback (need
it be stated -- instability).
Regarding remuneration for one's efforts. Essentially market forces are going
to rule. In this arena, the number of active participants -- off the top of my
head -- would not exceed 10, thus the maximum capital returns are trivial when
compared to the wider -- world -- market. I would have thought that it would be
very cheap advertising to answer all questions directly.
Paul D
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo!7 Mail has just got even bigger and better with unlimited storage on
all webmail accounts. Find out more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/885 - Release Date: 3/07/2007
10:02 AM
Other related posts:
