Re: Re:
- From: lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 15:40:13 +0000
okay thats great.
why is that a bad thing?
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 03 March 2016 03:38 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:
SFIV has all these new mechanics
SFV, not SFIV.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Ilitirit Sama
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I think that SFV is one of the most straight forward of the SF games to
understand in terms of strategy. It's even simpler than SFII in that regard.
It sounds weird because SFIV has all these new mechanics, but you'll often hear
people say "one thing I like about SFV is that I knew exactly why I lost".
Case-in-point: Lindseyboi. This is like the only SF game ever where he tried
to analyse his play, and was pretty much satisfied with his conclusions.
In SFII and even SFIV to an extent, you can lose every match without
understanding anything. I'm not even talking about stuff like Vortex or Option
Selects.
I tried to explain it at the session last time I was there using a very basic
example. Imagine you do a heavy move and the opponent blocks it. Beginners
will find it much harder to understand the same scenario in SFII and SFIV than
in SFV.
In SFV, you'll get punished if because you're at negative frames. You don't
really have to put a lot of thought into this interaction to understand it.
In SFII, you'll be safe because of the pushback, even though the move might
even be more negative than in SFV. If the opponent tries to counter poke, you
can whiff punish if you stand up to make your hitbox narrower. If you get
pushed back further than their longest poke, they might try to fireball
instead, and they risk eating a counter-super, or a jump on a hard-read. They
can choose to walk forward during your negative frames instead to put them in a
better position, at which point the RPS footsie game kicks in.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
No idea
I dont have it on PC... I havent heard anything negative about the PC port tho.
So I assume its probably fine.
________________________________
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 21:58:10 +0700
Subject: Re:
From: marongdin@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
How's the performance on pc for GGxrd?
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Not actually sure about Revelator on PC.
I assume it will come but not sure if its going to be close to the console
release.
Otherwise you can sail the seven seas in the meantime with Xrd till steam gets
Revelator.
Sofar there hasnt been any balance changes in Revelator so Xrd stuff works.
They will probably do a balance patch sometime after the console release after
the new characters has settled in. (Like they did with Xrd)
________________________________
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 21:41:14 +0700
Subject: Re:
From: marongdin@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
o_o i'm still busy trying to figure out SF5...
Is revelator out on PC? I rather get it in one go :]
I find GG easier to understand than SF5 at the moment -_- i can't seem to get
the timing right for SF in general.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Dont lolz me :P
Xrd is on PC now. You need to get into that stuff as well!
________________________________
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 21:35:51 +0700
Subject: Re:
From: marongdin@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Lolz
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Wynand-Ben
<paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Why play an inferior version of Guilty Gear when you can just play Guilty Gear?
________________________________
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re:
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 08:55:10 +0000
Mike said he must get dis game.
He wants to body us.
I aint having it.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 03 March 2016 08:46 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re:
It's not out yet.
I just bought the new Blazblue on Steam. R50 says I'll forget I did so by the
time I get home from work.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:40 AM, richard moorcroft
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
This looks like cool game, science combat is it?? Let's get it
On Mar 3, 2016 10:35 AM, "Ilitirit Sama"
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
http://www.diegosanches.com/201177/8631981/portfolio/science-combat
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:19 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
dunno man,
il let you take this one, I got next
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 03 March 2016 06:14 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Re:
Do GrandWest on Sat and play in the HS tourney.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
Sent: 03 March 2016 07:55 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re:
il go where everyone else is.
its no use I goto sessin and den errybody is der at gwest,
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 03 March 2016 05:47 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re:
Do you care enough about MKX to go?
On 3 Mar 2016 07:03, "lindsey kiviets"
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Morning peeps,
We having normal sessin on Saturday and ZG on Sunday?
OR we going both days to ZG? whats the plan?
________________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 02 March 2016 01:09 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Re:
I can try that. Hopefully it'll speed things up. Stupid American options with
branches. Too many time steps and I run out of memory.
Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Ilitirit Sama<
mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 2016-03-02 14:53
To:
cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: Re:
Can't you just write the results to a CSV file then save it as Excel afterwards?
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>>>
wrote:
Man, I’m bored senseless here. Built a small monte carlo model. Need to get it
through 100k runs. That’s not a real problem, but they want a copy-paste macro
in Excel dumping the results as it does them. This is stupid. Without this
added crap, the model could run in 5min. Built in anything but Excel it could
run in 1min. Now I’ve got it sitting for half an hour doing each 10k run and
pasting the results. The day Excel uses to learn more than one core will be a
time of great celebration.
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
[
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>]
On Behalf Of Ryan Williams
Sent: 02 March 2016 01:54 PM
To:
cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: Re:
Seeing KBR look at Noel and laugh after that happened was the best thing ever
*lol*
On 2 Mar 2016 13:42, "Stephen Scheidel"
<gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx><
mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>>>
wrote:
There is a gif on event scrubs of kbr vs noel.
Haggar threading the needle against phoenix with lariats.
Best moment of the weekend for me.
On Wednesday, 2 March 2016, Ryan Williams
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx><
mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>>
wrote:
Yeah, the grand finals matches were amazing. When KBR started winning, Yipes
referred to it as justice *lol* It was really impressive to see KBR play so
confidently after what had happened the day before.
That ft15 was really bad though...
On 2 Mar 2016 11:20, "sameegh jardine"
<sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx><
mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>>>
wrote:
Oh wow, I should probably watch the tourney then. I didn't think it possible
for KBR to come back from something like that.
When Champ started pausing I felt so bad for KBR. Turning down the handshake,
repulsing solo Haggar with Magnus, really disrespectful stuff.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Ryan Williams
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx><
mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>>
wrote:
Yup. That ft15 was horribly one-sided and the constant heckling by Champ just
made things worse. KBR managed to run it back quite convincingly in the
tournament though :P
On 2 Mar 2016 11:05, "sameegh jardine"
<sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx><
mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>>>
wrote:
You guys see FChamp vs KBR?
It was painful to watch.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:26 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
wrote:
okay well.... GB just told me...
http://store.steampowered.com/app/388750/
[Image removed by sender.]<
http://store.steampowered.com/app/388750/>
BlazBlue: Chronophantasma Extend on
Steam<
http://store.steampowered.com/app/388750/>
store.steampowered.com<
http://store.steampowered.com><
http://store.steampowered.com>
'BlazBlue: Chronophantasma Extend' is the sixth installment of the BlazBlue
series, a combination of 2D fighting action game and visual novel.
YOOOOOOOOOOO, mike needs to come get his ryt now
________________________________
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
on behalf of Di Lhong
<marongdin@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:marongdin@xxxxxxxxx><
mailto:marongdin@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>>>
Sent: 02 March 2016 06:47 AM
To:
cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: Re:
"(Swarm Queen) - increased combo damage scaling after dash cancelling out of
Wasp Grenade"
T_T why...
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Di Lhong
<marongdin@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:marongdin@xxxxxxxxx><
mailto:marongdin@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>>>
wrote:
Side track MKX.
http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2016/mar/01/brand-new-rollback-system-less-chip-damage-and-ton-more-mortal-kombat-x-3116-patch-notes/
"After a breaker or block breaker stamina is removed from both players"
That's interesting. Now using breakers are a bit more worthwhile. Before the
one who used the breaker is put on a defensive position while the opponent can
just run up and continue his pressure again due to having stamina.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:48 PM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
wrote:
Brawlhala please
________________________________
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
on behalf of Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx><
mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>>
Sent: 02 March 2016 05:43 AM
To:
cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: Re:
Sure, but we won't be the only ones playing
On 2 Mar 2016 07:40, "lindsey kiviets"
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
wrote:
Morning peeps,
Then it might as well be a CTS. you cant have offline matches in an online
tourney.
Am I missing something here?
________________________________
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
on behalf of Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx><
mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>>>
Sent: 01 March 2016 06:52 PM
To:
cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: Re:
Hey guys.
The MadHatters tournie guys have said we can participate in offline matches to
submit our scores.
That way we can stream with commentary, or at the very least, record and upload.
I think it would be cool to join then.
Thoughts?
On 1 Mar 2016 16:34, "Di Lhong"
<marongdin@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:marongdin@xxxxxxxxx><
mailto:marongdin@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>>>
wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMfggshW7bg
Oh Ryu...
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Sean Carrington
<theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx><
mailto:theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx>>>
wrote:
Watch this guys :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoUQRIloQeA.
Brilliant :D
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Sean Carrington
<theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx><
mailto:theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx>>>
wrote:
Salie is a FGC comedy genius LMAO
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Ilitirit Sama
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx><
mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>>
wrote:
@LB:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liog1-_V5fo
Taken from the first 3 sets I think.
I know you like it, but this game is not for me.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
**********************************************************************
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
//www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
Other related posts:
