Till later today I havent played anything on my PS4 since Infamous last year :P I blame myself for getting all the games on PC instead... From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:13:52 +0000 tbh ive only played volgar the Viking on it , and that was in January. I blame xrd and d3. From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:02:36 +0000 Are you even using the thing? What games do you have for it? From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:57:08 +0000 f u!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:53:56 +0000 You are stuck with a Xbone so you wouldn't be getting it either way :P From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:51:50 +0000 gamespot said the game is boring. I saw the review. From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:14:17 +0000 Anybody else picking up The Order today? From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 07:34:52 +0000 I need to get back into Initial D, I just read the first manga. Zombie will you have any objections to putting those manga books up as a prize for Kami? Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 23:13:53 -0800 Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx This is gay,, but it was very funny On Feb 20, 2015 8:55 AM, "Ashraf Barendse" <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Initial D has gotten weird since I last watched.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nk2wViKSh_M On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Tempted to do the same. Will make doing combo vids a lot easier. From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben Sent: 19 February 2015 10:46 PM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail Ill most likely get it on PC Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:28:25 +0200 Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx btw, anyone getting MKX on PC? On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: They'll probably be an expansion like Tekken 6 then Tekken 6 BR / TTT2 and then TTT2U. Which should be around the same release date as consoles. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: My problem with Tekken 7, is that by the time we get to play it, It'll be old. Or are the release dates closer together? On 19 Feb 2015 21:28, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: So I was watching some of the T7 stuff and thought about the character select screen. If they keep the character portraits at the same size then that would mean we can hopefully expect 12 more characters. Here's to hoping. made a pic to illustrate the idea :/ On 19 February 2015 at 20:47, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: damn dat new age skateboard tech, combining parkour and skating. Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:29:45 +0200 Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Jaws is definitely gnarly. He must have that adamantium frame tech. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vy1vuubPhDs On 19 February 2015 at 20:27, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: The parry ? On 19 February 2015 at 19:26, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: His Lee Sliding command also df~d~df+3 but have a MUCH longer reach than Lee Sliding. It has the same range if not slighting more than Raven's BT ff+3+4 During his dash stance df df he can do Wang's b+1,4 On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: I will use the slide :) On 19 February 2015 at 19:11, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: So much Shaheen footage...i'm already starting to know how to play him lolz Need more Katarina, Chloe footage. Claudio's footage is usually people trying to figure his glowing hand aka "starburst" mech. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Di here is some more T7. Bappara is a OG Japanese Lee expert that I steal from. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTUFkGtFLoU On 19 February 2015 at 17:55, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: The MK series had a lot of boinking. There was a tribe of boinking chicks that would steal "life essence" from their partners. Reptile boinked the most. He was immune to their "powers" Go figure. It didn't hurt that the girls in the story were good looking either. That hollywood make-up magic. Oh, and plastic surgery, natch. On 19 Feb 2015 17:12, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: lol That and Naruto/Bleach/One Piece seem to be the autopilot troll response whenever people ask "What anime is that" in AMVs or other media etc. Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:55:42 +0200 Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Fucksakes I just googled that here at work. smh :) On 19 February 2015 at 16:53, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: He could have said "Boku no Pico"... Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:49:39 +0200 Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx I hate you. On 19 February 2015 at 16:47, Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I think it’s Naruto. From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephen Scheidel Sent: 19 February 2015 4:42 PM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail Dawie's origimal name is David. Does anyone remember that cartoon with the green mice in the theater ? May have been french. Can't think of the name and google aint helping. On 19 February 2015 at 16:22, Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Me neither. Didn’t understand enough Afrikaans. Same with Brakenjan. Watched some stuff that was simulcast. From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of richard moorcroft Sent: 19 February 2015 4:21 PM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail Really?? I never watched the show On Feb 19, 2015 4:06 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Dawie doesnt die. He turns into an oaktree. Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:34:03 +0200 Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Firstly I would like to thank you guys for using the correct move name for raisins. Secondly I have to say that I SS hopkick delayed raisins like a fucking champion. :) On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: "Ek is Daaaaawie, die KABBBBOUUUTTTER!!" Damn, the feels *lmao* On 19 Feb 2015 15:24, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Oh shit! I didn't realise Dawie die Kabouter dies in the end. Come on, sing along everyone! DAWIE DIE KABOUTER AFRIKAANS INTRO LIED On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Paul has great punishment. Im sure something will hit. You guys created your own Lei myth about his stances not being punishable lol. From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:01:25 +0000 Are these all the cases where you’re badly negative, but totally unpunishable? Sorry, but I still don’t care that you don’t get continuous rush down. From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben Sent: 19 February 2015 2:54 PM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail Its great but that also kinda points out the problem. To get into Tiger(4th razor hit) you need razor CH or do delay shenanigans. Would have been nice to be on enough plus to force the opponent to block the incoming mixup instead getting to bait retaliation. Tiger is not really a problem tho since its the most usefull stance imo. It actually has answers for whatever the opponent does. Snake can mostly handle itself as well. Panther and Dragon needs some help on their transitions. This is all talking about transitions on HIT. On blocked razor into Tiger lei is at -14. Other stance transitions from razor on block are all worse than -10 on block as well. Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:38:57 +0200 Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx I saw a few Lei player then to go into Tiger after razor rush on hit and then hold back so you dash out of their range of their dick punch or their retaliation. That's where TGR 4 launches them. It's a weird set up but it works for those who are bad under pressure of razor rush and just think dick punch solves everything. Not sure if it'll work the same on block though. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: On block I dont mind. They just need to buff the frames on hit. Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:13:03 +0200 Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx I know they nerfed his razor rush a few times. It use to razor rush on block into stance and guess. Now razor rush on block into stance...dick punch/generic d+4 stops all. Lei's turn to guess...Unless his stances have hopkick...razor rush is not as strong as it used to be in old times. Also the razor rush sidestep into stances used to cover much more distance. I remember i could almost go into opponent's back if they do something linear or dick punch. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: It wasn’t just his combo damage was it? I might be wrong, but didn’t they buff his damage for other moves? I’m thinking very specifically of raisin rush on CH. I think you just need to get off your lazy ass and learn how to do Lei’s punishment game properly. From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben Sent: 19 February 2015 2:04 PM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail The problem is once he loses his damage(Im fairly sure hes not going to keep it) he going to be below average again unless his actual moves are improved. Trackings/Frames or otherwise From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:52:15 +0000 Paul’s d+1 doesn’t track all that well. Generally you are forced to use it because it’s his only fast-ish mid. He doesn’t have a generic df+1. You have df+2 at 15f, but that’s punishable. Meh, as Steve said, we’ve had these discussions before and they go round and round. Paul doesn’t need better tracking. He’s got his good punishment, nice wall game and good mid range moves. What he lacks is tracking or any sort of plus on block/ rush down game. If they give those to him, well then he jumps a bit in the tier list. Would I like those added? Sure. Is it a major issue not having them? Not really. Lei doesn’t need trackers. He has enough other tools. Are they good enough to make him top tier? Hell no. Is he still playable? Sure. From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Di Lhong Sent: 19 February 2015 1:44 PM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail Paul's d+1 tracks really well. He also have a generic db+4. Sure it's not as damaging as some homing move. But they're pokes that is fast and stops your opponent from walking around freely. And on hit, it puts you back to "your" game. Instead of defending and waiting to land a b+2 homing. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: what does paul get off his Tracker on hit/CH? I think Lei's is 1f slower(24f) with absolutely zero reward because he is forced to taunt. From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:35:24 +0000 Sure, while you’re at it, why not give Paul a tracker that’s under 25f as well. From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben Sent: 19 February 2015 1:33 PM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail Or make 1+2 track. Its high so can be ducked and stuff Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:27:31 +0200 Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Without ff+3...Lei has df+3 which is bad...especially on hit XD If they just make ff+3 a homing move, i wouldn't mind that. It's the fact it's not and we keep thinking we can step it... If they make Lei like Brad Wong. I'm quitting. That drunken BS is too fluid with no space for interruption between stance transition. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Dude ff+3 has stupid tracking. Lei will track fine without it doing both sides track. On 19 February 2015 at 13:21, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Lei's options getting stepped is already his a major weakness he has. He cant punish stepping properly and his trackers are ass. Its not even like ff+3 tracks properly either(And im fairly sure its only to one side). Cant decide to ff+3 because I think the opponent is going to step. Lei is no better gameplay wise than he was in T6. His damage boost is the only reason hes considered High in TTT2. Nerfing his tracking is the very last thing Lei needs. Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:14:29 +0200 Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx I would just make ff+3 a bit more linear ~ able to walk it to one side or something. Most of the tier list I've seen for TTT2 put him quite high. ...............There is nothing new we could discuss about Lei, we always bitch about him. On 19 February 2015 at 11:45, Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Spam raisin rush. You don’t need anything else. I wonder what they’ve done about Lei’s combo damage. Just that isn’t enough to help a character. Hwo always has high combo damage, but lacks the other tools to make him top tier. Lei, however, also has good punishment and average pokes. Got to say that I don’t think Lei is a particularly low character. I’d put him happily mid – probably below Paul though. From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben Sent: 19 February 2015 11:38 AM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail lol They could... but then hes going to need major buffs in order to compete. Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:34:12 +0200 Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Remove ff+3. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: His "poking" and non gimmicky stance game is not great. If you remove the shenanigans hes a below average character. So if they remove half his moves. Ie less gimmicks he needs stronger tools to play a more normal game. He got a big damage buff in TTT2 but they didnt fix any of the core problems with his moves sadly. From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:25:30 +0000 Lei needs buffs? LOL! Good one Paas. I need that. From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wynand-Ben Sent: 19 February 2015 11:12 AM To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail They could pretty much dump half of Lei's movelist but then they would have to buff the rest of his stuff. Currently he has boatload of very situational moves combined with some that are just straight up bad. Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:02:06 +0200 Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Lei and Capo lolz They need to remove some of their stuff and update them properly. Zafina might have a large move list. But all her moves are decent and useful. I wouldn't mind if they do a total revamp like they did for SC5. Maybe the series needs it. But keep some of the original cast and strong point of Tekken. Lucky Chloe moves are basically Capo Light. The same but doesn't knockdown lolz. She have a slippery kick that doesn't knock down and looks punishable as hell. On hit doesn't stagger or give much frames either T_T The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by AntiVirus software. The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by AntiVirus software. The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by AntiVirus software. The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by AntiVirus software. The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by AntiVirus software. The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by AntiVirus software. The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by AntiVirus software. The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by AntiVirus software. The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by AntiVirus software.