Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:26:54 +0200

His Lee Sliding command also df~d~df+3 but have a MUCH longer reach than
Lee Sliding. It has the same range if not slighting more than Raven's BT
ff+3+4

During his dash stance df df he can do Wang's b+1,4

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> I will use the slide :)
>
> On 19 February 2015 at 19:11, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> So much Shaheen footage...i'm already starting to know how to play him
>> lolz
>>
>> Need more Katarina, Chloe footage.
>>
>> Claudio's footage is usually people trying to figure his glowing hand aka
>> "starburst" mech.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Di here is some more T7.
>>> Bappara is a OG Japanese Lee expert that I steal from.
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTUFkGtFLoU
>>>
>>> On 19 February 2015 at 17:55, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> The MK series had a lot of boinking.
>>>> There was a tribe of boinking chicks that would steal "life essence"
>>>> from their partners.
>>>> Reptile boinked the most.  He was immune to their "powers"  Go figure.
>>>>
>>>> It didn't hurt that the girls in the story were good looking either.
>>>> That hollywood make-up magic.
>>>> Oh, and plastic surgery, natch.
>>>> On 19 Feb 2015 17:12, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> lol
>>>>>
>>>>> That and Naruto/Bleach/One Piece seem to be the autopilot troll
>>>>> response whenever people ask "What anime is that" in AMVs or other media
>>>>> etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:55:42 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> Fucksakes I just googled that here at work.
>>>>> smh :)
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19 February 2015 at 16:53, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> He could have said "Boku no Pico"...
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:49:39 +0200
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> I hate you.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 19 February 2015 at 16:47, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  I think it’s Naruto.
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel
>>>>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 4:42 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  Dawie's origimal name is David.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Does anyone remember that cartoon with the green mice in the theater
>>>>> ?
>>>>>  May have been french.
>>>>>  Can't think of the name and google aint helping.
>>>>>
>>>>>  On 19 February 2015 at 16:22, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Me neither.
>>>>> Didn’t understand enough Afrikaans. Same with Brakenjan. Watched some
>>>>> stuff that was simulcast.
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft
>>>>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 4:21 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>
>>>>> Really?? I never watched the show
>>>>>  On Feb 19, 2015 4:06 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Dawie doesnt die. He turns into an oaktree.
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>  Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:34:03 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> Firstly I would like to thank you guys for using the correct move name
>>>>> for raisins.
>>>>>  Secondly I have to say that I SS hopkick delayed raisins like a
>>>>> fucking champion.
>>>>>
>>>>>  :)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Ek is Daaaaawie, die KABBBBOUUUTTTER!!" Damn, the feels *lmao*
>>>>>  On 19 Feb 2015 15:24, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Oh shit!  I didn't realise Dawie die Kabouter dies in the end.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Come on, sing along everyone!
>>>>>
>>>>>  DAWIE DIE KABOUTER AFRIKAANS INTRO LIED
>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iymgR6fbzDI>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Paul has great punishment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Im sure something will hit.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You guys created your own Lei myth about his stances not being
>>>>> punishable lol.
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:01:25 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>>  Are these all the cases where you’re badly negative, but totally
>>>>> unpunishable?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, but I still don’t care that you don’t get continuous rush down.
>>>>>
>>>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 2:54 PM
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>
>>>>>  Its great but that also kinda points out the problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> To get into Tiger(4th razor hit) you need razor CH or do delay
>>>>> shenanigans.  Would have been nice to be on enough plus to force the
>>>>> opponent to block the incoming mixup instead getting to bait retaliation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tiger is not really a problem tho since its the most usefull stance
>>>>> imo.  It actually has answers for whatever the opponent does.
>>>>> Snake can mostly handle itself as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Panther and Dragon needs some help on their transitions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is all talking about transitions on HIT.
>>>>>
>>>>> On blocked razor into Tiger lei is at -14.
>>>>> Other stance transitions from razor on block are all worse than -10 on
>>>>> block as well.
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>  Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:38:57 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>  I saw a few Lei player then to go into Tiger after razor rush on hit
>>>>> and then hold back so you dash out of their range of their dick punch or
>>>>> their retaliation. That's where TGR 4 launches them. It's a weird set up
>>>>> but it works for those who are bad under pressure of razor rush and just
>>>>> think dick punch solves everything.
>>>>>  Not sure if it'll work the same on block though.
>>>>>
>>>>>  On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  On block I dont mind.
>>>>>
>>>>> They just need to buff the frames on hit.
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>  Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:13:03 +0200
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>   I know they nerfed his razor rush a few times.
>>>>>  It use to razor rush on block into stance and guess.
>>>>>  Now razor rush on block into stance...dick punch/generic d+4 stops
>>>>> all. Lei's turn to guess...Unless his stances have hopkick...razor rush is
>>>>> not as strong as it used to be in old times. Also the razor rush sidestep
>>>>> into stances used to cover much more distance. I remember i could almost 
>>>>> go
>>>>> into opponent's back if they do something linear or dick punch.
>>>>>
>>>>>  On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  It wasn’t just his combo damage was it?
>>>>> I might be wrong, but didn’t they buff his damage for other moves? I’m
>>>>> thinking very specifically of raisin rush on CH.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you just need to get off your lazy ass and learn how to do
>>>>> Lei’s punishment game properly.
>>>>>
>>>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 2:04 PM
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>
>>>>>  The problem is once he loses his damage(Im fairly sure hes not going
>>>>> to keep it) he going to be below average again unless his actual moves are
>>>>> improved.
>>>>>
>>>>> Trackings/Frames or otherwise
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:52:15 +0000
>>>>>  Paul’s d+1 doesn’t track all that well. Generally you are forced to
>>>>> use it because it’s his only fast-ish mid. He doesn’t have a generic df+1.
>>>>> You have df+2 at 15f, but that’s punishable.
>>>>> Meh, as Steve said, we’ve had these discussions before and they go
>>>>> round and round. Paul doesn’t need better tracking. He’s got his good
>>>>> punishment, nice wall game and good mid range moves. What he lacks is
>>>>> tracking or any sort of plus on block/ rush down game. If they give those
>>>>> to him, well then he jumps a bit in the tier list. Would I like those
>>>>> added? Sure. Is it a major issue not having them? Not really.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lei doesn’t need trackers. He has enough other tools. Are they good
>>>>> enough to make him top tier? Hell no. Is he still playable? Sure.
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>> Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>>>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 1:44 PM
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>
>>>>>  Paul's d+1 tracks really well. He also have a generic db+4.
>>>>>  Sure it's not as damaging as some homing move. But they're pokes
>>>>> that is fast and stops your opponent from walking around freely. And on
>>>>> hit, it puts you back to "your" game. Instead of defending and waiting to
>>>>> land a b+2 homing.
>>>>>
>>>>>  On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  what does paul get off his Tracker on hit/CH?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think Lei's is 1f slower(24f) with absolutely zero reward because he
>>>>> is forced to taunt.
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:35:24 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>>  Sure, while you’re at it, why not give Paul a tracker that’s under
>>>>> 25f as well.
>>>>>
>>>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 1:33 PM
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>
>>>>>  Or make 1+2 track.
>>>>>
>>>>> Its high so can be ducked and stuff
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>  Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:27:31 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>   Without ff+3...Lei has df+3 which is bad...especially on hit XD
>>>>>  If they just make ff+3 a homing move, i wouldn't mind that. It's the
>>>>> fact it's not and we keep thinking we can step it...
>>>>>  If they make Lei like Brad Wong. I'm quitting. That drunken BS is
>>>>> too fluid with no space for interruption between stance transition.
>>>>>
>>>>>  On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Dude ff+3 has stupid tracking.
>>>>>  Lei will track fine without it doing both sides track.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  On 19 February 2015 at 13:21, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Lei's options getting stepped is already his a major weakness he has.
>>>>>
>>>>> He cant punish stepping properly and his trackers are ass.
>>>>>
>>>>> Its not even like ff+3 tracks properly either(And im fairly sure its
>>>>> only to one side).  Cant decide to ff+3 because I think the opponent is
>>>>> going to step.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lei is no better gameplay wise than he was in T6.  His damage boost is
>>>>> the only reason hes considered High in TTT2.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nerfing his tracking is the very last thing Lei needs.
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>  Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:14:29 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>  I would just make ff+3 a bit more linear ~ able to walk it to one
>>>>> side or something.
>>>>>  Most of the tier list I've seen for TTT2 put him quite high.
>>>>>
>>>>>  ...............There is nothing new we could discuss about Lei, we
>>>>> always bitch about him.
>>>>>
>>>>>  On 19 February 2015 at 11:45, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Spam raisin rush. You don’t need anything else.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder what they’ve done about Lei’s combo damage. Just that isn’t
>>>>> enough to help a character. Hwo always has high combo damage, but lacks 
>>>>> the
>>>>> other tools to make him top tier. Lei, however, also has good punishment
>>>>> and average pokes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Got to say that I don’t think Lei is a particularly low character. I’d
>>>>> put him happily mid – probably below Paul though.
>>>>>
>>>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 11:38 AM
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  lol
>>>>>
>>>>> They could...  but then hes going to need major buffs in order to
>>>>> compete.
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>  Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:34:12 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>  Remove ff+3.
>>>>>
>>>>>  On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  His "poking" and non gimmicky stance game is not great.  If you
>>>>> remove the shenanigans hes a below average character.
>>>>>
>>>>> So if they remove half his moves.  Ie less gimmicks he needs stronger
>>>>> tools to play a more normal game.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> He got a big damage buff in TTT2 but they didnt fix any of the core
>>>>> problems with his moves sadly.
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:25:30 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>>  Lei needs buffs? LOL!
>>>>> Good one Paas. I need that.
>>>>>
>>>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 11:12 AM
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>
>>>>>  They could pretty much dump half of Lei's movelist but then they
>>>>> would have to buff the rest of his stuff.
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently he has boatload of very situational moves combined with some
>>>>> that are just straight up bad.
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>  Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:02:06 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>   Lei and Capo lolz They need to remove some of their stuff and
>>>>> update them properly.
>>>>>  Zafina might have a large move list. But all her moves are decent
>>>>> and useful.
>>>>>  I wouldn't mind if they do a total revamp like they did for SC5.
>>>>> Maybe the series needs it. But keep some of the original cast and strong
>>>>> point of Tekken.
>>>>>  Lucky Chloe moves are basically Capo Light. The same but doesn't
>>>>> knockdown lolz. She have a slippery kick that doesn't knock down and looks
>>>>> punishable as hell. On hit doesn't stagger or give much frames either T_T
>>>>>
>>>>>     ------------------------------
>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>      ------------------------------
>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    ------------------------------
>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     ------------------------------
>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>     ------------------------------
>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    ------------------------------
>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>        ------------------------------
>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2015