Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:27:58 +0200

The parry ?


On 19 February 2015 at 19:26, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> His Lee Sliding command also df~d~df+3 but have a MUCH longer reach than
> Lee Sliding. It has the same range if not slighting more than Raven's BT
> ff+3+4
>
> During his dash stance df df he can do Wang's b+1,4
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> I will use the slide :)
>>
>> On 19 February 2015 at 19:11, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> So much Shaheen footage...i'm already starting to know how to play him
>>> lolz
>>>
>>> Need more Katarina, Chloe footage.
>>>
>>> Claudio's footage is usually people trying to figure his glowing hand
>>> aka "starburst" mech.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Di here is some more T7.
>>>> Bappara is a OG Japanese Lee expert that I steal from.
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTUFkGtFLoU
>>>>
>>>> On 19 February 2015 at 17:55, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The MK series had a lot of boinking.
>>>>> There was a tribe of boinking chicks that would steal "life essence"
>>>>> from their partners.
>>>>> Reptile boinked the most.  He was immune to their "powers"  Go figure.
>>>>>
>>>>> It didn't hurt that the girls in the story were good looking either.
>>>>> That hollywood make-up magic.
>>>>> Oh, and plastic surgery, natch.
>>>>> On 19 Feb 2015 17:12, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> lol
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That and Naruto/Bleach/One Piece seem to be the autopilot troll
>>>>>> response whenever people ask "What anime is that" in AMVs or other media
>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:55:42 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fucksakes I just googled that here at work.
>>>>>> smh :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 19 February 2015 at 16:53, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He could have said "Boku no Pico"...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:49:39 +0200
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hate you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 19 February 2015 at 16:47, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I think it’s Naruto.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel
>>>>>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 4:42 PM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Dawie's origimal name is David.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Does anyone remember that cartoon with the green mice in the
>>>>>> theater ?
>>>>>>  May have been french.
>>>>>>  Can't think of the name and google aint helping.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On 19 February 2015 at 16:22, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Me neither.
>>>>>> Didn’t understand enough Afrikaans. Same with Brakenjan. Watched some
>>>>>> stuff that was simulcast.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft
>>>>>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 4:21 PM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Really?? I never watched the show
>>>>>>  On Feb 19, 2015 4:06 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Dawie doesnt die. He turns into an oaktree.
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>  Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:34:03 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Firstly I would like to thank you guys for using the correct move
>>>>>> name for raisins.
>>>>>>  Secondly I have to say that I SS hopkick delayed raisins like a
>>>>>> fucking champion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Ek is Daaaaawie, die KABBBBOUUUTTTER!!" Damn, the feels *lmao*
>>>>>>  On 19 Feb 2015 15:24, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Oh shit!  I didn't realise Dawie die Kabouter dies in the end.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Come on, sing along everyone!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  DAWIE DIE KABOUTER AFRIKAANS INTRO LIED
>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iymgR6fbzDI>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Paul has great punishment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Im sure something will hit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You guys created your own Lei myth about his stances not being
>>>>>> punishable lol.
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:01:25 +0000
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Are these all the cases where you’re badly negative, but totally
>>>>>> unpunishable?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, but I still don’t care that you don’t get continuous rush down.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>>> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 2:54 PM
>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Its great but that also kinda points out the problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To get into Tiger(4th razor hit) you need razor CH or do delay
>>>>>> shenanigans.  Would have been nice to be on enough plus to force the
>>>>>> opponent to block the incoming mixup instead getting to bait retaliation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tiger is not really a problem tho since its the most usefull stance
>>>>>> imo.  It actually has answers for whatever the opponent does.
>>>>>> Snake can mostly handle itself as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Panther and Dragon needs some help on their transitions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is all talking about transitions on HIT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On blocked razor into Tiger lei is at -14.
>>>>>> Other stance transitions from razor on block are all worse than -10
>>>>>> on block as well.
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>  Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:38:57 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>  I saw a few Lei player then to go into Tiger after razor rush on
>>>>>> hit and then hold back so you dash out of their range of their dick punch
>>>>>> or their retaliation. That's where TGR 4 launches them. It's a weird set 
>>>>>> up
>>>>>> but it works for those who are bad under pressure of razor rush and just
>>>>>> think dick punch solves everything.
>>>>>>  Not sure if it'll work the same on block though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On block I dont mind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They just need to buff the frames on hit.
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>  Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:13:03 +0200
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>   I know they nerfed his razor rush a few times.
>>>>>>  It use to razor rush on block into stance and guess.
>>>>>>  Now razor rush on block into stance...dick punch/generic d+4 stops
>>>>>> all. Lei's turn to guess...Unless his stances have hopkick...razor rush 
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> not as strong as it used to be in old times. Also the razor rush sidestep
>>>>>> into stances used to cover much more distance. I remember i could almost 
>>>>>> go
>>>>>> into opponent's back if they do something linear or dick punch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  It wasn’t just his combo damage was it?
>>>>>> I might be wrong, but didn’t they buff his damage for other moves?
>>>>>> I’m thinking very specifically of raisin rush on CH.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think you just need to get off your lazy ass and learn how to do
>>>>>> Lei’s punishment game properly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>>> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 2:04 PM
>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  The problem is once he loses his damage(Im fairly sure hes not
>>>>>> going to keep it) he going to be below average again unless his actual
>>>>>> moves are improved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Trackings/Frames or otherwise
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:52:15 +0000
>>>>>>  Paul’s d+1 doesn’t track all that well. Generally you are forced to
>>>>>> use it because it’s his only fast-ish mid. He doesn’t have a generic 
>>>>>> df+1.
>>>>>> You have df+2 at 15f, but that’s punishable.
>>>>>> Meh, as Steve said, we’ve had these discussions before and they go
>>>>>> round and round. Paul doesn’t need better tracking. He’s got his good
>>>>>> punishment, nice wall game and good mid range moves. What he lacks is
>>>>>> tracking or any sort of plus on block/ rush down game. If they give those
>>>>>> to him, well then he jumps a bit in the tier list. Would I like those
>>>>>> added? Sure. Is it a major issue not having them? Not really.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lei doesn’t need trackers. He has enough other tools. Are they good
>>>>>> enough to make him top tier? Hell no. Is he still playable? Sure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>>> Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>>>>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 1:44 PM
>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Paul's d+1 tracks really well. He also have a generic db+4.
>>>>>>  Sure it's not as damaging as some homing move. But they're pokes
>>>>>> that is fast and stops your opponent from walking around freely. And on
>>>>>> hit, it puts you back to "your" game. Instead of defending and waiting to
>>>>>> land a b+2 homing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  what does paul get off his Tracker on hit/CH?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think Lei's is 1f slower(24f) with absolutely zero reward because
>>>>>> he is forced to taunt.
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:35:24 +0000
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Sure, while you’re at it, why not give Paul a tracker that’s under
>>>>>> 25f as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>>> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 1:33 PM
>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Or make 1+2 track.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Its high so can be ducked and stuff
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>  Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:27:31 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>   Without ff+3...Lei has df+3 which is bad...especially on hit XD
>>>>>>  If they just make ff+3 a homing move, i wouldn't mind that. It's
>>>>>> the fact it's not and we keep thinking we can step it...
>>>>>>  If they make Lei like Brad Wong. I'm quitting. That drunken BS is
>>>>>> too fluid with no space for interruption between stance transition.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Dude ff+3 has stupid tracking.
>>>>>>  Lei will track fine without it doing both sides track.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On 19 February 2015 at 13:21, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Lei's options getting stepped is already his a major weakness he
>>>>>> has.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He cant punish stepping properly and his trackers are ass.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Its not even like ff+3 tracks properly either(And im fairly sure its
>>>>>> only to one side).  Cant decide to ff+3 because I think the opponent is
>>>>>> going to step.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lei is no better gameplay wise than he was in T6.  His damage boost
>>>>>> is the only reason hes considered High in TTT2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nerfing his tracking is the very last thing Lei needs.
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>  Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:14:29 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I would just make ff+3 a bit more linear ~ able to walk it to one
>>>>>> side or something.
>>>>>>  Most of the tier list I've seen for TTT2 put him quite high.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  ...............There is nothing new we could discuss about Lei, we
>>>>>> always bitch about him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On 19 February 2015 at 11:45, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Spam raisin rush. You don’t need anything else.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wonder what they’ve done about Lei’s combo damage. Just that isn’t
>>>>>> enough to help a character. Hwo always has high combo damage, but lacks 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> other tools to make him top tier. Lei, however, also has good punishment
>>>>>> and average pokes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Got to say that I don’t think Lei is a particularly low character.
>>>>>> I’d put him happily mid – probably below Paul though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>>> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 11:38 AM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  lol
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They could...  but then hes going to need major buffs in order to
>>>>>> compete.
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>  Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:34:12 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>  Remove ff+3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Wynand-Ben <
>>>>>> paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  His "poking" and non gimmicky stance game is not great.  If you
>>>>>> remove the shenanigans hes a below average character.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So if they remove half his moves.  Ie less gimmicks he needs stronger
>>>>>> tools to play a more normal game.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He got a big damage buff in TTT2 but they didnt fix any of the core
>>>>>> problems with his moves sadly.
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:25:30 +0000
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Lei needs buffs? LOL!
>>>>>> Good one Paas. I need that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>>> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>>> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 11:12 AM
>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  They could pretty much dump half of Lei's movelist but then they
>>>>>> would have to buff the rest of his stuff.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently he has boatload of very situational moves combined with
>>>>>> some that are just straight up bad.
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>>  Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:02:06 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>   Lei and Capo lolz They need to remove some of their stuff and
>>>>>> update them properly.
>>>>>>  Zafina might have a large move list. But all her moves are decent
>>>>>> and useful.
>>>>>>  I wouldn't mind if they do a total revamp like they did for SC5.
>>>>>> Maybe the series needs it. But keep some of the original cast and strong
>>>>>> point of Tekken.
>>>>>>  Lucky Chloe moves are basically Capo Light. The same but doesn't
>>>>>> knockdown lolz. She have a slippery kick that doesn't knock down and 
>>>>>> looks
>>>>>> punishable as hell. On hit doesn't stagger or give much frames either T_T
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     ------------------------------
>>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other 
>>>>>> information
>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, 
>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing 
>>>>>> services
>>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>>> Information
>>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      ------------------------------
>>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other 
>>>>>> information
>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, 
>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing 
>>>>>> services
>>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>>> Information
>>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    ------------------------------
>>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other 
>>>>>> information
>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, 
>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing 
>>>>>> services
>>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>>> Information
>>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     ------------------------------
>>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other 
>>>>>> information
>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, 
>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing 
>>>>>> services
>>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>>> Information
>>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>     ------------------------------
>>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other 
>>>>>> information
>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, 
>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing 
>>>>>> services
>>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>>> Information
>>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    ------------------------------
>>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other 
>>>>>> information
>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, 
>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing 
>>>>>> services
>>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>>> Information
>>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>        ------------------------------
>>>>>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other 
>>>>>> information
>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, 
>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing 
>>>>>> services
>>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>>> Information
>>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this 
>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in 
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other 
>>>>>> information
>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, 
>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing 
>>>>>> services
>>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. 
>>>>>> Information
>>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Other related posts: