Di here is some more T7. Bappara is a OG Japanese Lee expert that I steal from. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTUFkGtFLoU On 19 February 2015 at 17:55, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The MK series had a lot of boinking. > There was a tribe of boinking chicks that would steal "life essence" from > their partners. > Reptile boinked the most. He was immune to their "powers" Go figure. > > It didn't hurt that the girls in the story were good looking either. That > hollywood make-up magic. > Oh, and plastic surgery, natch. > On 19 Feb 2015 17:12, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> lol >> >> That and Naruto/Bleach/One Piece seem to be the autopilot troll response >> whenever people ask "What anime is that" in AMVs or other media etc. >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:55:42 +0200 >> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Fucksakes I just googled that here at work. >> smh :) >> >> On 19 February 2015 at 16:53, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> He could have said "Boku no Pico"... >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:49:39 +0200 >> >> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> I hate you. >> >> On 19 February 2015 at 16:47, Donaldson, Alasdair < >> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I think it’s Naruto. >> >> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> *On Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel >> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 4:42 PM >> >> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> >> >> Dawie's origimal name is David. >> >> Does anyone remember that cartoon with the green mice in the theater ? >> May have been french. >> Can't think of the name and google aint helping. >> >> On 19 February 2015 at 16:22, Donaldson, Alasdair < >> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Me neither. >> Didn’t understand enough Afrikaans. Same with Brakenjan. Watched some >> stuff that was simulcast. >> >> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft >> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 4:21 PM >> >> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >> >> Really?? I never watched the show >> On Feb 19, 2015 4:06 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> Dawie doesnt die. He turns into an oaktree. >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:34:03 +0200 >> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Firstly I would like to thank you guys for using the correct move name >> for raisins. >> Secondly I have to say that I SS hopkick delayed raisins like a fucking >> champion. >> >> :) >> >> On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> "Ek is Daaaaawie, die KABBBBOUUUTTTER!!" Damn, the feels *lmao* >> On 19 Feb 2015 15:24, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Oh shit! I didn't realise Dawie die Kabouter dies in the end. >> >> Come on, sing along everyone! >> >> DAWIE DIE KABOUTER AFRIKAANS INTRO LIED >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iymgR6fbzDI> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> Paul has great punishment. >> >> Im sure something will hit. >> >> >> You guys created your own Lei myth about his stances not being punishable >> lol. >> ------------------------------ >> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:01:25 +0000 >> >> Are these all the cases where you’re badly negative, but totally >> unpunishable? >> >> Sorry, but I still don’t care that you don’t get continuous rush down. >> >> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben >> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 2:54 PM >> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >> >> Its great but that also kinda points out the problem. >> >> To get into Tiger(4th razor hit) you need razor CH or do delay >> shenanigans. Would have been nice to be on enough plus to force the >> opponent to block the incoming mixup instead getting to bait retaliation. >> >> Tiger is not really a problem tho since its the most usefull stance imo. >> It actually has answers for whatever the opponent does. >> Snake can mostly handle itself as well. >> >> Panther and Dragon needs some help on their transitions. >> >> >> This is all talking about transitions on HIT. >> >> On blocked razor into Tiger lei is at -14. >> Other stance transitions from razor on block are all worse than -10 on >> block as well. >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:38:57 +0200 >> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> I saw a few Lei player then to go into Tiger after razor rush on hit >> and then hold back so you dash out of their range of their dick punch or >> their retaliation. That's where TGR 4 launches them. It's a weird set up >> but it works for those who are bad under pressure of razor rush and just >> think dick punch solves everything. >> Not sure if it'll work the same on block though. >> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> On block I dont mind. >> >> They just need to buff the frames on hit. >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:13:03 +0200 >> >> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> I know they nerfed his razor rush a few times. >> It use to razor rush on block into stance and guess. >> Now razor rush on block into stance...dick punch/generic d+4 stops all. >> Lei's turn to guess...Unless his stances have hopkick...razor rush is not >> as strong as it used to be in old times. Also the razor rush sidestep into >> stances used to cover much more distance. I remember i could almost go into >> opponent's back if they do something linear or dick punch. >> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> It wasn’t just his combo damage was it? >> I might be wrong, but didn’t they buff his damage for other moves? I’m >> thinking very specifically of raisin rush on CH. >> >> I think you just need to get off your lazy ass and learn how to do Lei’s >> punishment game properly. >> >> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben >> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 2:04 PM >> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >> >> The problem is once he loses his damage(Im fairly sure hes not going to >> keep it) he going to be below average again unless his actual moves are >> improved. >> >> Trackings/Frames or otherwise >> ------------------------------ >> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:52:15 +0000 >> Paul’s d+1 doesn’t track all that well. Generally you are forced to use >> it because it’s his only fast-ish mid. He doesn’t have a generic df+1. You >> have df+2 at 15f, but that’s punishable. >> Meh, as Steve said, we’ve had these discussions before and they go round >> and round. Paul doesn’t need better tracking. He’s got his good punishment, >> nice wall game and good mid range moves. What he lacks is tracking or any >> sort of plus on block/ rush down game. If they give those to him, well then >> he jumps a bit in the tier list. Would I like those added? Sure. Is it a >> major issue not having them? Not really. >> >> Lei doesn’t need trackers. He has enough other tools. Are they good >> enough to make him top tier? Hell no. Is he still playable? Sure. >> >> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong >> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 1:44 PM >> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> >> Paul's d+1 tracks really well. He also have a generic db+4. >> Sure it's not as damaging as some homing move. But they're pokes that >> is fast and stops your opponent from walking around freely. And on hit, it >> puts you back to "your" game. Instead of defending and waiting to land a >> b+2 homing. >> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> what does paul get off his Tracker on hit/CH? >> >> I think Lei's is 1f slower(24f) with absolutely zero reward because he is >> forced to taunt. >> ------------------------------ >> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:35:24 +0000 >> >> Sure, while you’re at it, why not give Paul a tracker that’s under 25f >> as well. >> >> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben >> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 1:33 PM >> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >> >> Or make 1+2 track. >> >> Its high so can be ducked and stuff >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:27:31 +0200 >> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Without ff+3...Lei has df+3 which is bad...especially on hit XD >> If they just make ff+3 a homing move, i wouldn't mind that. It's the >> fact it's not and we keep thinking we can step it... >> If they make Lei like Brad Wong. I'm quitting. That drunken BS is too >> fluid with no space for interruption between stance transition. >> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Stephen Scheidel < >> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Dude ff+3 has stupid tracking. >> Lei will track fine without it doing both sides track. >> >> >> On 19 February 2015 at 13:21, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> Lei's options getting stepped is already his a major weakness he has. >> >> He cant punish stepping properly and his trackers are ass. >> >> Its not even like ff+3 tracks properly either(And im fairly sure its only >> to one side). Cant decide to ff+3 because I think the opponent is going to >> step. >> >> Lei is no better gameplay wise than he was in T6. His damage boost is >> the only reason hes considered High in TTT2. >> >> Nerfing his tracking is the very last thing Lei needs. >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:14:29 +0200 >> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> I would just make ff+3 a bit more linear ~ able to walk it to one side >> or something. >> Most of the tier list I've seen for TTT2 put him quite high. >> >> ...............There is nothing new we could discuss about Lei, we >> always bitch about him. >> >> On 19 February 2015 at 11:45, Donaldson, Alasdair < >> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Spam raisin rush. You don’t need anything else. >> >> I wonder what they’ve done about Lei’s combo damage. Just that isn’t >> enough to help a character. Hwo always has high combo damage, but lacks the >> other tools to make him top tier. Lei, however, also has good punishment >> and average pokes. >> >> Got to say that I don’t think Lei is a particularly low character. I’d >> put him happily mid – probably below Paul though. >> >> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben >> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 11:38 AM >> >> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >> >> >> lol >> >> They could... but then hes going to need major buffs in order to compete. >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:34:12 +0200 >> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Remove ff+3. >> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> His "poking" and non gimmicky stance game is not great. If you remove >> the shenanigans hes a below average character. >> >> So if they remove half his moves. Ie less gimmicks he needs stronger >> tools to play a more normal game. >> >> >> He got a big damage buff in TTT2 but they didnt fix any of the core >> problems with his moves sadly. >> ------------------------------ >> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail >> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:25:30 +0000 >> >> Lei needs buffs? LOL! >> Good one Paas. I need that. >> >> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ >> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On >> Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben >> *Sent:* 19 February 2015 11:12 AM >> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail >> >> They could pretty much dump half of Lei's movelist but then they would >> have to buff the rest of his stuff. >> >> Currently he has boatload of very situational moves combined with some >> that are just straight up bad. >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:02:06 +0200 >> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail >> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Lei and Capo lolz They need to remove some of their stuff and update >> them properly. >> Zafina might have a large move list. But all her moves are decent and >> useful. >> I wouldn't mind if they do a total revamp like they did for SC5. Maybe >> the series needs it. But keep some of the original cast and strong point of >> Tekken. >> Lucky Chloe moves are basically Capo Light. The same but doesn't >> knockdown lolz. She have a slippery kick that doesn't knock down and looks >> punishable as hell. On hit doesn't stagger or give much frames either T_T >> >> ------------------------------ >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> ------------------------------ >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this >> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information >> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> obtained from your KPMG representative. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> AntiVirus software. >> >> >> >>