I stumbled across the article on Reddit, and it reminded me of that time you spoke about Alf. I also remember the Mortal Kombat tv series ended with all the main characters dying, but then again, it's Mortal Kombat. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > What brought this about? > > I wish my net access was working. I’ve got a fair bit of free time here – > which explains the continuous emails. Wasting time on Cracked is all good. > > > > I remember a while ago there was some murder in the states and they showed > the killer’s browser history. It was a bunch of google searches on murder > and hiding bodies and stuff, then randomly in the middle was him surfing > Cracked. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Ashraf Barendse > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 2:38 PM > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > Stu, I remember you talking about Alf and the way the series ended, which > basically meant that he gets tortured and killed. > > http://www.cracked.com/article_18490_the-7-most-soul-crushing-series-finales-in-tv-history.html > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Not all ff tracks ss or sw. Usually it should. > > I think out of that list, King's ff+4 might not track at all. It's a very > linear move. Similar to Lili's ff+2...stupid linear. > > Paul's ff+2 might have some tracking. ss or sw i'm not entirely sure. > > ff moves is in between not too fast and not too slow. If it's too fast, SW > will usually step it. If too slow, ss will step it. It's a tricky part. > Lei's ff+3 seems to be in the right spot haha. eg. Lili's ff+4 is too slow > to track (the low stomp) ff+3 is also too slow to track. ff+2 MIGHT track > ss but not sw for sure. > > You can also delay your input to adjust fast ff moves to track a bit > better. So don't do ff+2:1 at the fastest input. f~F+2:1. Something in that > sense. Tekken allows 2frame buffering/input delay i think between each > moves. So you do the f~n to dash a bit to realign then F+2:1 for the move. > If you do ff+2:1 as fast as possible. It won't have that f~n dash to > realign itself. > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I’d be interested to see how most ff moves do against sw. > > So, take a few different ones like: > > Paul: ff+2:1 > > Lei: ff+3 > > King ff+4 > > And just see how the majority of these do with side walking and how much > of a ff motion is enough to adjust or whether simply doing the move will > help. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 2:25 PM > > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > Ah ok. > > Yeah ss and sw is 2 different things really. Some move may track ss but > doesn't mean it'll track sw... > > Having pokes that at least stops people from ss is always helpful. Stop > people from doing things like df1 on block ss bait for retaliation then > launch them. I don't think there's moves that tracks sw though. That's > where homing comes into play. > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Df+1 > 2 – delay it and it is safe (-9) > > Df+4 was safe in BR. Didn’t realise that it wasn’t in TTT2. Yeah, d+4 is > probably a better bet though. > > Df+2 is spammable. Df+2>1 is easily hit confirmable. When the CH goes > through (just easier for me), you’ve got the combo. > > > > Yeah, I don’t really sw or ss enough. At least swy forces me to adjust > some of the time. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 2:07 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > Not so spammable... > df+1,2 is -11... > > df+2,1 is high second hit > > d+4 would be better than df+4 since he duck and kicks...at least it'll > crush high. Also it's not -14 on block. > > Paul's d+1 is 14frames...that's not fast??? > > Tracking is only a big issue if you don't ss sw yourself. Some characters > have better tracking than others for sure. But that means you just have to > ss sw to make your stuff track. > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It’s also not just a question of actual trackers. > > King’s got nice homing moves – the rolling sabot thing – f+3. It’s mid, > safe, fast and homing. Ub+1 is the other one – you ss and get a high homing > move. Works especially nicely after a ss – you can almost go around the > opponent while doing a homing move. > > Anyways, those aside, the moves that you spam with King – df+1,2 or df+2,1 > or df+4 or 2,1 – all of them seem to just track a bit. Now I get that some > moves track a bit to certain sides, but Kings moves just seem to follow the > opponent better than the stuff Paul does. On Paul’s side, d+1, db+4 (and > ws+4 actually) seem to do an okay job at close range for stopping the > opponent. Of those three moves, only one of them is for throwing out while > standing around – d+1. It’s not the fastest move out there though (well at > least faster in TTT2 than BR though). > > > > *From:* Donaldson, Alasdair > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 1:54 PM > *To:* 'cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > Paul’s df+1 isn’t the best for tracking. D+1 will do a better job. > > Yeah, the df+2. In theory it doesn’t do anything special. In reality… > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 1:50 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > Yeah, the notation is a bit awkward. Stick to d+1 db+4 and df1 (not sure > how well does df1 track)...Also df2 tracks a little i think. > > In general, quick lows usually track. Unless it has special property or > something (eg. hits ground or something like that). > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Paul’s is 28f. > > On normal hit, I get a knd, but it also hits the guy strangely, so not > nice oki. On CH I get full combo as in after it, I go for qcf+1 elbow > launch. > > > > @Di – no idea how fast his qcb+4 is. The major problem with that is that > it’s not something that I can do in retaliation to seeing movement. It’s an > amazing move in general and sweet on CH, but the fact that it comes out of > a swy means that it loses the homing usefulness. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 1:41 PM > > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > what does paul get off his Tracker on hit/CH? > > > > I think Lei's is 1f slower(24f) with absolutely zero reward because he is > forced to taunt. > ------------------------------ > > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:35:24 +0000 > > Sure, while you’re at it, why not give Paul a tracker that’s under 25f as > well. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 1:33 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > Or make 1+2 track. > > Its high so can be ducked and stuff > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:27:31 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Without ff+3...Lei has df+3 which is bad...especially on hit XD > > If they just make ff+3 a homing move, i wouldn't mind that. It's the fact > it's not and we keep thinking we can step it... > > If they make Lei like Brad Wong. I'm quitting. That drunken BS is too > fluid with no space for interruption between stance transition. > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Dude ff+3 has stupid tracking. > > Lei will track fine without it doing both sides track. > > > > > > On 19 February 2015 at 13:21, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Lei's options getting stepped is already his a major weakness he has. > > He cant punish stepping properly and his trackers are ass. > > Its not even like ff+3 tracks properly either(And im fairly sure its only > to one side). Cant decide to ff+3 because I think the opponent is going to > step. > > Lei is no better gameplay wise than he was in T6. His damage boost is the > only reason hes considered High in TTT2. > > Nerfing his tracking is the very last thing Lei needs. > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:14:29 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > I would just make ff+3 a bit more linear ~ able to walk it to one side or > something. > > Most of the tier list I've seen for TTT2 put him quite high. > > > > ...............There is nothing new we could discuss about Lei, we always > bitch about him. > > > > On 19 February 2015 at 11:45, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Spam raisin rush. You don’t need anything else. > > I wonder what they’ve done about Lei’s combo damage. Just that isn’t > enough to help a character. Hwo always has high combo damage, but lacks the > other tools to make him top tier. Lei, however, also has good punishment > and average pokes. > > Got to say that I don’t think Lei is a particularly low character. I’d put > him happily mid – probably below Paul though. > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 11:38 AM > > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > > > lol > > They could... but then hes going to need major buffs in order to compete. > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:34:12 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Remove ff+3. > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > His "poking" and non gimmicky stance game is not great. If you remove > the shenanigans hes a below average character. > > So if they remove half his moves. Ie less gimmicks he needs stronger > tools to play a more normal game. > > > He got a big damage buff in TTT2 but they didnt fix any of the core > problems with his moves sadly. > ------------------------------ > > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:25:30 +0000 > > > > Lei needs buffs? LOL! > Good one Paas. I need that. > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 11:12 AM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > They could pretty much dump half of Lei's movelist but then they would > have to buff the rest of his stuff. > > Currently he has boatload of very situational moves combined with some > that are just straight up bad. > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:02:06 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Lei and Capo lolz They need to remove some of their stuff and update them > properly. > > Zafina might have a large move list. But all her moves are decent and > useful. > > I wouldn't mind if they do a total revamp like they did for SC5. Maybe the > series needs it. But keep some of the original cast and strong point of > Tekken. > > Lucky Chloe moves are basically Capo Light. The same but doesn't knockdown > lolz. She have a slippery kick that doesn't knock down and looks punishable > as hell. On hit doesn't stagger or give much frames either T_T > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. >