Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

  • From: Jack Steel <orichih@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:28:10 +0200

Jump hphp,lp-hiden.jumphp,hp,lp,special 5 stock

On 2/7/14, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Potemkpwn rocks
>
> Buddy of mine used to play him in Reloaded.  Hes a bastard.
>
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:05:09 +0200
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Potemkin!
> On 07 Feb 2014 1:02 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> @stu , also in bb and gg, its not advisable to play who you like. its a
> recipe for disaster, especially if you new to the game in general.
>
> theres a hierarchy, playing someone like litchi from the start could can be
> done but its a long and hard road. case in point , failtrtit , jumped right
> into a hard to play character and failed.
>
>
> I suggest trying everyone and starting with someone not as hard to learn
> then continuing onwards to more complex to use characters. youl get much
> more out of the game that way.
>
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:57:48 +0000
>
>
>
>
> Yeap
>
> From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:56:15 +0200
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> What's bb? blazeblue?
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> But it does!
>
> Cause im not LB
>
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:51:00 +0000
>
>
>
>
> LOL
>
> playing CT and a little of CS2 doesn't make you qualified.
>
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:49:17 +0000
>
>
>
>
> Enough = more qualified than anything LB could achieve
>
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:47:03 +0000
>
>
>
>
> enough = under qualified
>
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:45:39 +0000
>
>
>
>
> Ive played enough of BB to tell you that you are mistaken
>
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:40:26 +0000
>
>
>
>
> as the only person qualified to talk about bb here , I can safely say its
> more diverse than gg's cast or any other games cast , by far.
>
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:39:10 +0000
>
>
>
>
> BB wishes it had GGs cast
>
> GG cast is fucking godlike
>
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:28:30 +0000
>
>
>
>
> I disagree, best cast of all fg belongs to bb.
>
>
>
>> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:25:28 +0200
>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> GG has probably one of the best casts in any fg ever I think and
>> shouldn't be changed.
>>
>> KI has like 5 characters and 3 of them are Jago.
>
>
>
>> gtfo with this super demo fighter ftp bullshit and give us a full game to
>> buy.
>>
>> On 07/02/2014, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>> > don't get me wrong , all gg's have been great. except for isuka,
>> > however,
>> > making the game on a new console with better graphics is not going to
>> > save
>> > the game unless they give us different chracters
>
>
>
>> > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>
>> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:18:32 +0000
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Well since no one here has access to KI, the game isn't going anywhere.
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>
>
>
>> > On Behalf Of sameegh jardine
>> >
>> > Sent: 07 February 2014 11:15 AM
>> >
>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>
>
>
>> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> >
>> >
>> > Xrd > KI
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:14 AM, lindsey kiviets
>> > <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > xrd is meh, theres notinhg really new.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:12:38 +0200
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> >
>> > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>> >
>> > It's a given!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Xrd is the where it's at in 2014.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > wrote:
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Im just praying that the new Guilty Gear takes off properly...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I really fucking hope so
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> > All you bastards better get that game :P
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:53:28 +0200
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> >
>> > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > It's easier to get the basics of a 2D fighter down, but mastering
>> > something
>> > like SF, Mahvel or KOF is no easy feat.
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> > I find wavedashing easier than plinkdashing as an example.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Similarly, I find staple bnbs easier in TTT than I do in 2D fighters.
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> > 2d learning curve is faster than 3d. when you don't have to worry about
>> > SS...it's pretty easy...there are a lot of tekken players who can play
>> > 2d
>> > games...but not many 2d game players who can play tekken. because if
>> > you
>
>
>
>> > don't ss in tekken
>> >  or 3d games...you will die.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > When namco dumb downed the game/cut characters for T4...the lost ALL
>> > the
>> > hardcore players ...so that was clearly not the way to go. Actually it's
>> > the
>
>
>
>> > other way round. Tekken is losing casual players but hardcore players
>> > are
>> > still playing
>> >  and enjoying the game. Because with Tag partners, they get to
>> > experiment
>> > with other characters. Once they mastered the characters they play,
>> > they
>
>
>
>> > just partner their mains with other stuff to have fun. More hardcore
>> > players
>> > are appearing in the korean scene.
>> >  The korean players who were popular in BR but isn't present now are
>> > either
>
>
>
>> > grown up and has to work now or they're in the army hahaha BR some of
>> > them
>> > just stop playing because they didn't enjoy it as much. Also they love
>> > the
>> > tagging mechanic because they mastered
>
>
>
>> >  that long time ago in TTT1.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:37 AM, lindsey kiviets
>> > <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > and its still failed.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 3d is old news. 2.5d to 2d is the way to go.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From:
>> > paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>> >
>> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> >
>> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:33:23 +0000
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hopefully the use Tekken vs SF to test the waters a bit with possible
>
>
>
>> > changes
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > But yea, they need to dumb the game down somehow.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > SC5 needs to be popular lol
>> >
>> > They did a amazing job with that game imo.  Think its the right balance,
>> > not
>
>
>
>> > too many characters, not too many moves etc.  Much easier than tekken to
>> > get
>> > into.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From:
>> > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>> >
>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> >
>> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:26:24 +0000
>
>
>
>> >
>> > You really think the complete failure of a game (TTT2 is dead in the
>> > West)
>> > is simply the result of nerfing one character?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I have no idea what Namco could do to save the Tekken series. They're
>> > losing
>
>
>
>> > the hardcore players and the game's learning curve means that you're
>> > not
>> > getting enough new players
>> >  in either. Maybe they just need to reboot the series and make some
>> > massive
>
>
>
>> > changes. The last time they did something like that was T4, and while I
>> > loved the game, it wasn't exactly loved either.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From:
>> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>
>
>
>> > On Behalf Of Di Lhong
>> >
>> > Sent: 07 February 2014 9:57 AM
>> >
>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Also in BR...tier list was stupid...if you're low tier vs a top tier
>> > bob...it's really hard to win...while TTT2 is more balanced out.
>> >
>
>
>> >
>
>> >
>> >
>> > T6BR evo is all about d+1 bob...spammable move all day...take that out?
>> > they
>> > all quit tekken and bitch about how the new TTT2 isn't as fun hahaha
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Well, when it's best out of 5 format for top 8, it becomes a major
>> > snorefest.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Tekken not as fun to watch? false. lolz
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair
>> > <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Looking good. It's sad that Tekken isn't there this year, especially
>> > since
>> > last year was so hype with Bronson running through everyone. TTT2 just
>> > isn't
>
>
>
>> > actually
>> >  that exciting to watch.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Glad Injustice is still there. KI too.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Anyways, Nick - any luck on the venue thing for Evo weekend? Uh, you
>> > were
>
>
>
>> > looking around for one, right?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From:
>> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>
>
>
>> > On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
>> >
>> > Sent: 07 February 2014 6:28 AM
>> >
>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/feb/06/evo-2014-game-line-be-announced-tonight-iplaywinners-fray-catch-live-stream-here/
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > i agree with most of the line up however , to be fair , KI shouldnt be
>
>
>
>> > there. its still early days and i doubt they'l be releasing extra 4
>> > characters befo evo. LOL @ sfxt.
>> > BB is gna be sooo HYPE.
>> > Official EVO 2014 game line up
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> > * Ultra Street Fighter 4
>> >
>> > * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3
>> >
>> > * Injustice: Gods Among Us
>> >
>> > * King of Fighters 13
>> >
>
>
>
>> > * Killer Instinct
>> >
>> > * Blazblue Chrono Phantasma
>> >
>> > * Super Smash Bros. Melee (a spot is reserved for Melee but Nintendo
>> > must
>> > approve first. Discussions currently taking place)
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Additional notes:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > * Mr. Wizard stated that after EVO 2013, Tekken has dropped off a bit.
>> > With
>> > this year being the game's 20th anniversary, the EVO team didn't want
>> > to
>
>
>
>> > risk having a new version of Tekken be released, while an outdated
>> > version
>> > is on the game line up, so the franchise
>> >  was omitted this year.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > * Instead of having designated Road to EVO events, major tournaments
>> > with a
>
>
>
>> > certain amount of entrants will qualify for seeding points. Tournament
>> > organizers of majors events will have to submit results to the EVO team.
>> > Mr.
>> > Wizard mentioned that the system
>
>
>> >  is still being worked out. These results will only apply for games on
>> > the
>
>> > EVO line up.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > * This year is the 20th anniversary of Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo.
>> > Tournament of Legends will be back this year, and EVO will also be
>> > holding
>
>
>
>> > the 3v3, single elimination tournament, X-Mania US, the national Super
>> > Turbo
>> > event from Japan.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > * Exhibition matches aren't currently scheduled, but will be fit into
>> > the
>
>
>
>> > line up if they can get set up. Combo videos will return if the
>> > community
>> > makes them.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > * If Kokonoe were to stay the way she is now in Blazblue Chrono
>> > Phantasma,
>
>
>
>> > she would be banned at EVO. She will be allowed however, as a patch to
>> > balance her is incoming.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > * Developer panels will be returning this year.
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 will be 3 out of 5, as long as EVO
>> > doesn't
>> > have double the entrants as last year. Other games getting 3 out of 5 in
>> > top
>
>
>> > 8 will be dependent on how each game plays out.
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > * Bring Your Own Console will be back this year, and there will be
>> > designated areas for players who want to run side tournaments.
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 02:30:34 +0200
>> >
>> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> >
>> > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>> >
>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > It's like Capcom and SFIV.  They own the IP, Dimps developed it.
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Xrd!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:05:32 +0200
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>
>> >
>> > From:
>> > gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > KI is shit anyway.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 6 February 2014 21:26, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Handing out an Ip means you let go of the reigns.
>> >
>> > Good luck catching the horse again.
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> > On 6 Feb 2014 21:20, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > no , DH are just the developers of the game.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > MS asked them to make a fg . they were doing a goodjob and MS didnt
>> > like
>
>
>
>> > that. sigh, now i never get to play it. its probably all downhill from
>> > here.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 21:16:42 +0200
>> >
>> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
>
>
>> >
>> > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>
>
>
>> > Rare owned Killer Instinct, MicroScrotums owned Rare.
>> >
>> > Double Helix now owns Killer Instinct.
>> >
>> > Amazon now owns Double Helix.
>> >
>> > Sounds like a planned Coup.
>
>
>
>> >
>> > On 6 Feb 2014 20:53, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > MS owns killer instinct. its not coming on ps anytime soon
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 20:38:29 +0200
>> >
>
>
>
>> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> >
>> > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>> >
>> > Yeh, I was as surprised as my opponent.
>> >
>> > No scrap that, he had the look of someone whose soul had been stolen by
>> > Shang Tsung.
>> >
>> > Cool guy, would've been neet if he spoke more.
>
>
>
>> >
>> > But then, compared to most, I spout verbal diarrhea like Rufus - That's
>> > a
>> > close 2nd to GB.
>> >
>> > I called the whole Killer Instinct "buy out" when the studio was born.
>
>
>
>> >
>> > Not sell on more than just 1 platform?
>> >
>> > That's akin to game programming suicide.  I expect to see the game
>> > coming to
>> > all platforms.  The great Enno has predixiated.
>
>
>
>> >
>> > On 6 Feb 2014 20:06, "Jack Steel" <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >> Great kof 13 vid.Tht anoaxe goro combo wicked finish.greatness!
>
>
>
>> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>> > e-mail
>> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
>> > in
>
>
>
>> > error, please address
>> >  with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
>> > sender,
>> > then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
>> > intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action
>
>
>
>> > taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
>> >  on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice
>> > contained
>> > in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
>
>
>
>> > governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and
>> > other
>> > information in this e-mail and any attachments
>> >  that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither
>> > given
>
>
>
>> > nor endorsed by it.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> > error-free,
>> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> > destroyed,
>
>
>
>> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>> > services
>
>
>
>> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
>> > Swiss
>> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity
>> >  for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
>
>
>
>> > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
>> > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each
>> > describes
>> > itself as such. Information about the
>
>
>
>> >  structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> > obtained
>> > from your KPMG representative.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>
>
>
>> > AntiVirus software.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>> > e-mail
>
>
>
>> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
>> > in
>> > error, please address
>> >  with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
>> > sender,
>
>
>
>> > then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
>> > intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action
>> > taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
>
>
>
>> >  on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice
>> > contained
>> > in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
>> > governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and
>> > other
>
>
>
>> > information in this e-mail and any attachments
>> >  that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither
>> > given
>> > nor endorsed by it.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> > error-free,
>
>> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> > destroyed,
>> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>
>
>
>> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>> > services
>> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
>> > Swiss
>> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity
>
>
>
>> >  for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
>> > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
>> > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each
>> > describes
>
>
>
>> > itself as such. Information about the
>> >  structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> > obtained
>> > from your KPMG representative.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> > AntiVirus software.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>
>
>
>> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>> > e-mail
>> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
>> > in
>> > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>> > to
>
>
>
>> > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
>> > it. If
>> > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> > distribution or
>> > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
>> > and
>
>
>
>> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
>> > subject
>> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
>> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
>
>
>
>> > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business
>> > of
>> > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> > error-free,
>
>
>
>> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> > destroyed,
>> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>
>
>
>> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>> > services
>> > to you.  KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
>> > Swiss
>> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>> > independent
>
>
>
>> > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> > services
>> > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct
>> > and
>> > separate entity and each describes itself as such.  Information about
>> > the
>
>
>
>> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> > obtained
>> > from your KPMG representative.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>
>
>
>> > AntiVirus software.
>> >
>> =========================================================================
>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>>
>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>
>
>
>                                                                               
>                                                                               
>                                                                               
>                                                                               
>       
>
>                                                                               
>
=========================================================================
You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.

//www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc

Other related posts: