Jump hphp,lp-hiden.jumphp,hp,lp,special 5 stock On 2/7/14, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Potemkpwn rocks > > Buddy of mine used to play him in Reloaded. Hes a bastard. > > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:05:09 +0200 > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > From: jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Potemkin! > On 07 Feb 2014 1:02 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > @stu , also in bb and gg, its not advisable to play who you like. its a > recipe for disaster, especially if you new to the game in general. > > theres a hierarchy, playing someone like litchi from the start could can be > done but its a long and hard road. case in point , failtrtit , jumped right > into a hard to play character and failed. > > > I suggest trying everyone and starting with someone not as hard to learn > then continuing onwards to more complex to use characters. youl get much > more out of the game that way. > > From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:57:48 +0000 > > > > > Yeap > > From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:56:15 +0200 > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > What's bb? blazeblue? > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > > > But it does! > > Cause im not LB > > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:51:00 +0000 > > > > > LOL > > playing CT and a little of CS2 doesn't make you qualified. > > From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:49:17 +0000 > > > > > Enough = more qualified than anything LB could achieve > > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:47:03 +0000 > > > > > enough = under qualified > > From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:45:39 +0000 > > > > > Ive played enough of BB to tell you that you are mistaken > > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:40:26 +0000 > > > > > as the only person qualified to talk about bb here , I can safely say its > more diverse than gg's cast or any other games cast , by far. > > From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:39:10 +0000 > > > > > BB wishes it had GGs cast > > GG cast is fucking godlike > > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:28:30 +0000 > > > > > I disagree, best cast of all fg belongs to bb. > > > >> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:25:28 +0200 >> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > > > >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> GG has probably one of the best casts in any fg ever I think and >> shouldn't be changed. >> >> KI has like 5 characters and 3 of them are Jago. > > > >> gtfo with this super demo fighter ftp bullshit and give us a full game to >> buy. >> >> On 07/02/2014, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> > don't get me wrong , all gg's have been great. except for isuka, >> > however, >> > making the game on a new console with better graphics is not going to >> > save >> > the game unless they give us different chracters > > > >> > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > >> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:18:32 +0000 >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Well since no one here has access to KI, the game isn't going anywhere. > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > >> > On Behalf Of sameegh jardine >> > >> > Sent: 07 February 2014 11:15 AM >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> > >> > Xrd > KI >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:14 AM, lindsey kiviets >> > <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > xrd is meh, theres notinhg really new. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:12:38 +0200 > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > >> > >> > It's a given! >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Xrd is the where it's at in 2014. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > Im just praying that the new Guilty Gear takes off properly... >> > >> > >> > >> > I really fucking hope so >> > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > All you bastards better get that game :P >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:53:28 +0200 >> > >> > >> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > It's easier to get the basics of a 2D fighter down, but mastering >> > something >> > like SF, Mahvel or KOF is no easy feat. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > I find wavedashing easier than plinkdashing as an example. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Similarly, I find staple bnbs easier in TTT than I do in 2D fighters. > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > 2d learning curve is faster than 3d. when you don't have to worry about >> > SS...it's pretty easy...there are a lot of tekken players who can play >> > 2d >> > games...but not many 2d game players who can play tekken. because if >> > you > > > >> > don't ss in tekken >> > or 3d games...you will die. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > When namco dumb downed the game/cut characters for T4...the lost ALL >> > the >> > hardcore players ...so that was clearly not the way to go. Actually it's >> > the > > > >> > other way round. Tekken is losing casual players but hardcore players >> > are >> > still playing >> > and enjoying the game. Because with Tag partners, they get to >> > experiment >> > with other characters. Once they mastered the characters they play, >> > they > > > >> > just partner their mains with other stuff to have fun. More hardcore >> > players >> > are appearing in the korean scene. >> > The korean players who were popular in BR but isn't present now are >> > either > > > >> > grown up and has to work now or they're in the army hahaha BR some of >> > them >> > just stop playing because they didn't enjoy it as much. Also they love >> > the >> > tagging mechanic because they mastered > > > >> > that long time ago in TTT1. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:37 AM, lindsey kiviets >> > <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > and its still failed. >> > >> > >> > >> > 3d is old news. 2.5d to 2d is the way to go. >> > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > From: >> > paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> > >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > >> > >> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:33:23 +0000 >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Hopefully the use Tekken vs SF to test the waters a bit with possible > > > >> > changes >> > >> > >> > >> > But yea, they need to dumb the game down somehow. >> > >> > >> > >> > SC5 needs to be popular lol >> > >> > They did a amazing job with that game imo. Think its the right balance, >> > not > > > >> > too many characters, not too many moves etc. Much easier than tekken to >> > get >> > into. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > From: >> > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > > > >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:26:24 +0000 > > > >> > >> > You really think the complete failure of a game (TTT2 is dead in the >> > West) >> > is simply the result of nerfing one character? >> > >> > >> > >> > I have no idea what Namco could do to save the Tekken series. They're >> > losing > > > >> > the hardcore players and the game's learning curve means that you're >> > not >> > getting enough new players >> > in either. Maybe they just need to reboot the series and make some >> > massive > > > >> > changes. The last time they did something like that was T4, and while I >> > loved the game, it wasn't exactly loved either. >> > >> > >> > >> > From: >> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > >> > On Behalf Of Di Lhong >> > >> > Sent: 07 February 2014 9:57 AM >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > Also in BR...tier list was stupid...if you're low tier vs a top tier >> > bob...it's really hard to win...while TTT2 is more balanced out. >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > T6BR evo is all about d+1 bob...spammable move all day...take that out? >> > they >> > all quit tekken and bitch about how the new TTT2 isn't as fun hahaha >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > Well, when it's best out of 5 format for top 8, it becomes a major >> > snorefest. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > >> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Tekken not as fun to watch? false. lolz > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair >> > <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Looking good. It's sad that Tekken isn't there this year, especially >> > since >> > last year was so hype with Bronson running through everyone. TTT2 just >> > isn't > > > >> > actually >> > that exciting to watch. >> > >> > >> > >> > Glad Injustice is still there. KI too. >> > >> > >> > >> > Anyways, Nick - any luck on the venue thing for Evo weekend? Uh, you >> > were > > > >> > looking around for one, right? >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > From: >> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > >> > On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets >> > >> > Sent: 07 February 2014 6:28 AM >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/feb/06/evo-2014-game-line-be-announced-tonight-iplaywinners-fray-catch-live-stream-here/ > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > i agree with most of the line up however , to be fair , KI shouldnt be > > > >> > there. its still early days and i doubt they'l be releasing extra 4 >> > characters befo evo. LOL @ sfxt. >> > BB is gna be sooo HYPE. >> > Official EVO 2014 game line up >> > > > > >> > >> > * Ultra Street Fighter 4 >> > >> > * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 >> > >> > * Injustice: Gods Among Us >> > >> > * King of Fighters 13 >> > > > > >> > * Killer Instinct >> > >> > * Blazblue Chrono Phantasma >> > >> > * Super Smash Bros. Melee (a spot is reserved for Melee but Nintendo >> > must >> > approve first. Discussions currently taking place) > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > Additional notes: >> > >> > >> > >> > * Mr. Wizard stated that after EVO 2013, Tekken has dropped off a bit. >> > With >> > this year being the game's 20th anniversary, the EVO team didn't want >> > to > > > >> > risk having a new version of Tekken be released, while an outdated >> > version >> > is on the game line up, so the franchise >> > was omitted this year. >> > >> > >> > >> > * Instead of having designated Road to EVO events, major tournaments >> > with a > > > >> > certain amount of entrants will qualify for seeding points. Tournament >> > organizers of majors events will have to submit results to the EVO team. >> > Mr. >> > Wizard mentioned that the system > > >> > is still being worked out. These results will only apply for games on >> > the > >> > EVO line up. >> > >> > >> > >> > * This year is the 20th anniversary of Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo. >> > Tournament of Legends will be back this year, and EVO will also be >> > holding > > > >> > the 3v3, single elimination tournament, X-Mania US, the national Super >> > Turbo >> > event from Japan. >> > >> > >> > >> > * Exhibition matches aren't currently scheduled, but will be fit into >> > the > > > >> > line up if they can get set up. Combo videos will return if the >> > community >> > makes them. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > * If Kokonoe were to stay the way she is now in Blazblue Chrono >> > Phantasma, > > > >> > she would be banned at EVO. She will be allowed however, as a patch to >> > balance her is incoming. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > * Developer panels will be returning this year. > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 will be 3 out of 5, as long as EVO >> > doesn't >> > have double the entrants as last year. Other games getting 3 out of 5 in >> > top > > >> > 8 will be dependent on how each game plays out. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > * Bring Your Own Console will be back this year, and there will be >> > designated areas for players who want to run side tournaments. >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 02:30:34 +0200 >> > >> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx > > > >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> > It's like Capcom and SFIV. They own the IP, Dimps developed it. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Xrd! >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:05:32 +0200 >> > >> > >> > >> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > >> > >> > From: >> > gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > KI is shit anyway. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On 6 February 2014 21:26, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> > > > >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Handing out an Ip means you let go of the reigns. >> > >> > Good luck catching the horse again. >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > On 6 Feb 2014 21:20, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > no , DH are just the developers of the game. >> > >> > >> > >> > MS asked them to make a fg . they were doing a goodjob and MS didnt >> > like > > > >> > that. sigh, now i never get to play it. its probably all downhill from >> > here. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 21:16:42 +0200 >> > >> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > >> > >> > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > > > > >> > Rare owned Killer Instinct, MicroScrotums owned Rare. >> > >> > Double Helix now owns Killer Instinct. >> > >> > Amazon now owns Double Helix. >> > >> > Sounds like a planned Coup. > > > >> > >> > On 6 Feb 2014 20:53, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > MS owns killer instinct. its not coming on ps anytime soon >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 20:38:29 +0200 >> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >> > >> > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx >> > >> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > >> > >> > Yeh, I was as surprised as my opponent. >> > >> > No scrap that, he had the look of someone whose soul had been stolen by >> > Shang Tsung. >> > >> > Cool guy, would've been neet if he spoke more. > > > >> > >> > But then, compared to most, I spout verbal diarrhea like Rufus - That's >> > a >> > close 2nd to GB. >> > >> > I called the whole Killer Instinct "buy out" when the studio was born. > > > >> > >> > Not sell on more than just 1 platform? >> > >> > That's akin to game programming suicide. I expect to see the game >> > coming to >> > all platforms. The great Enno has predixiated. > > > >> > >> > On 6 Feb 2014 20:06, "Jack Steel" <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Great kof 13 vid.Tht anoaxe goro combo wicked finish.greatness! > > > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this >> > e-mail >> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication >> > in > > > >> > error, please address >> > with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original >> > sender, >> > then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the >> > intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action > > > >> > taken or omitted to be taken in reliance >> > on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice >> > contained >> > in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the > > > >> > governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and >> > other >> > information in this e-mail and any attachments >> > that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither >> > given > > > >> > nor endorsed by it. >> > >> > >> > >> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> > error-free, >> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> > destroyed, > > > >> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing >> > services > > > >> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a >> > Swiss >> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity >> > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG > > > >> > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG >> > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each >> > describes >> > itself as such. Information about the > > > >> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> > obtained >> > from your KPMG representative. >> > >> > >> > >> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > > > >> > AntiVirus software. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this >> > e-mail > > > >> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication >> > in >> > error, please address >> > with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original >> > sender, > > > >> > then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the >> > intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action >> > taken or omitted to be taken in reliance > > > >> > on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice >> > contained >> > in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the >> > governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and >> > other > > > >> > information in this e-mail and any attachments >> > that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither >> > given >> > nor endorsed by it. >> > >> > >> > > > >> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> > error-free, > >> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> > destroyed, >> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > > > >> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing >> > services >> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a >> > Swiss >> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity > > > >> > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG >> > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG >> > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each >> > describes > > > >> > itself as such. Information about the >> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> > obtained >> > from your KPMG representative. >> > >> > >> > > > > >> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >> > AntiVirus software. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > > > >> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this >> > e-mail >> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication >> > in >> > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send >> > to > > > >> > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of >> > it. If >> > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >> > distribution or >> > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited >> > and > > > >> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are >> > subject >> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client >> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this > > > >> > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business >> > of >> > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >> > >> > >> > >> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >> > error-free, > > > >> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >> > destroyed, >> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >> > >> > >> > >> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > > > >> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing >> > services >> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a >> > Swiss >> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of >> > independent > > > >> > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >> > services >> > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct >> > and >> > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about >> > the > > > >> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >> > obtained >> > from your KPMG representative. >> > >> > >> > >> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > > > >> > AntiVirus software. >> > >> ========================================================================= >> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list. >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc > > > > > > > > > > > ========================================================================= You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list. //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc