Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

  • From: sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:53:28 +0200

It's easier to get the basics of a 2D fighter down, but mastering something
like SF, Mahvel or KOF is no easy feat.

I find wavedashing easier than plinkdashing as an example.

Similarly, I find staple bnbs easier in TTT than I do in 2D fighters.



On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 2d learning curve is faster than 3d. when you don't have to worry about
> SS...it's pretty easy...there are a lot of tekken players who can play 2d
> games...but not many 2d game players who can play tekken. because if you
> don't ss in tekken or 3d games...you will die.
>
> When namco dumb downed the game/cut characters for T4...the lost ALL the
> hardcore players ...so that was clearly not the way to go. Actually it's
> the other way round. Tekken is losing casual players but hardcore players
> are still playing and enjoying the game. Because with Tag partners, they
> get to experiment with other characters. Once they mastered the characters
> they play, they just partner their mains with other stuff to have fun. More
> hardcore players are appearing in the korean scene. The korean players who
> were popular in BR but isn't present now are either grown up and has to
> work now or they're in the army hahaha BR some of them just stop playing
> because they didn't enjoy it as much. Also they love the tagging mechanic
> because they mastered that long time ago in TTT1.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:37 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> and its still failed.
>>
>> 3d is old news. 2.5d to 2d is the way to go.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:33:23 +0000
>>
>>
>> Hopefully the use Tekken vs SF to test the waters a bit with possible
>> changes
>>
>> But yea, they need to dumb the game down somehow.
>>
>> SC5 needs to be popular lol
>> They did a amazing job with that game imo.  Think its the right balance,
>> not too many characters, not too many moves etc.  Much easier than tekken
>> to get into.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:26:24 +0000
>>
>>  You really think the complete failure of a game (TTT2 is dead in the
>> West) is simply the result of nerfing one character?
>>
>>
>>
>> I have no idea what Namco could do to save the Tekken series. They're
>> losing the hardcore players and the game's learning curve means that you're
>> not getting enough new players in either. Maybe they just need to reboot
>> the series and make some massive changes. The last time they did something
>> like that was T4, and while I loved the game, it wasn't exactly loved
>> either.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>> *Sent:* 07 February 2014 9:57 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>
>>
>>
>> Also in BR...tier list was stupid...if you're low tier vs a top tier
>> bob...it's really hard to win...while TTT2 is more balanced out.
>>
>>
>>
>> T6BR evo is all about d+1 bob...spammable move all day...take that out?
>> they all quit tekken and bitch about how the new TTT2 isn't as fun hahaha
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Well, when it's best out of 5 format for top 8, it becomes a major
>> snorefest.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Tekken not as fun to watch? false. lolz
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  Looking good. It's sad that Tekken isn't there this year, especially
>> since last year was so hype with Bronson running through everyone. TTT2
>> just isn't actually that exciting to watch.
>>
>>
>>
>> Glad Injustice is still there. KI too.
>>
>>
>>
>> Anyways, Nick - any luck on the venue thing for Evo weekend? Uh, you were
>> looking around for one, right?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 07 February 2014 6:28 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/feb/06/evo-2014-game-line-be-announced-tonight-iplaywinners-fray-catch-live-stream-here/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> i agree with most of the line up however , to be fair , KI shouldnt be
>> there. its still early days and i doubt they'l be releasing extra 4
>> characters befo evo. LOL @ sfxt.
>> BB is gna be sooo HYPE. Official EVO 2014 game line up
>>
>>
>> * Ultra Street Fighter 4
>> * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3
>> * Injustice: Gods Among Us
>> * King of Fighters 13
>> * Killer Instinct
>> * Blazblue Chrono Phantasma
>> * Super Smash Bros. Melee (a spot is reserved for Melee but Nintendo must
>> approve first. Discussions currently taking place)
>>
>> *Additional notes:*
>>
>> * Mr. Wizard stated that after EVO 2013, Tekken has dropped off a bit.
>> With this year being the game's 20th anniversary, the EVO team didn't want
>> to risk having a new version of Tekken be released, while an outdated
>> version is on the game line up, so the franchise was omitted this year.
>>
>> * Instead of having designated Road to EVO events, major tournaments with
>> a certain amount of entrants will qualify for seeding points. Tournament
>> organizers of majors events will have to submit results to the EVO team.
>> Mr. Wizard mentioned that the system is still being worked out. These
>> results will only apply for games on the EVO line up.
>>
>> * This year is the 20th anniversary of Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo.
>> Tournament of Legends will be back this year, and EVO will also be holding
>> the 3v3, single elimination tournament, X-Mania US, the national Super
>> Turbo event from Japan.
>>
>> * Exhibition matches aren't currently scheduled, but will be fit into the
>> line up if they can get set up. Combo videos will return if the community
>> makes them.
>>
>> * If Kokonoe were to stay the way she is now in Blazblue Chrono
>> Phantasma, she would be banned at EVO. She will be allowed however, as a
>> patch to balance her is incoming.
>>
>> * Developer panels will be returning this year.
>>
>> * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 will be 3 out of 5, as long as EVO doesn't
>> have double the entrants as last year. Other games getting 3 out of 5 in
>> top 8 will be dependent on how each game plays out.
>>
>> * Bring Your Own Console will be back this year, and there will be
>> designated areas for players who want to run side tournaments.
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 02:30:34 +0200
>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> It's like Capcom and SFIV.  They own the IP, Dimps developed it.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Xrd!
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:05:32 +0200
>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>
>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> KI is shit anyway.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6 February 2014 21:26, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Handing out an Ip means you let go of the reigns.
>> Good luck catching the horse again.
>>
>> On 6 Feb 2014 21:20, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  no , DH are just the developers of the game.
>>
>> MS asked them to make a fg . they were doing a goodjob and MS didnt like
>> that. sigh, now i never get to play it. its probably all downhill from here.
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 21:16:42 +0200
>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Rare owned Killer Instinct, MicroScrotums owned Rare.
>> Double Helix now owns Killer Instinct.
>> Amazon now owns Double Helix.
>>
>> Sounds like a planned Coup.
>>
>> On 6 Feb 2014 20:53, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  MS owns killer instinct. its not coming on ps anytime soon
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 20:38:29 +0200
>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Yeh, I was as surprised as my opponent.
>>
>> No scrap that, he had the look of someone whose soul had been stolen by
>> Shang Tsung.
>> Cool guy, would've been neet if he spoke more.
>> But then, compared to most, I spout verbal diarrhea like Rufus - That's a
>> close 2nd to GB.
>>
>> I called the whole Killer Instinct "buy out" when the studio was born.
>> Not sell on more than just 1 platform?
>> That's akin to game programming suicide.  I expect to see the game coming
>> to all platforms.  The great Enno has predixiated.
>>
>> On 6 Feb 2014 20:06, "Jack Steel" <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > Great kof 13 vid.Tht anoaxe goro combo wicked finish.greatness!
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>
>

Other related posts: