It's a given! Xrd is the where it's at in 2014. On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Im just praying that the new Guilty Gear takes off properly... > > I really fucking hope so > > > All you bastards better get that game :P > > ------------------------------ > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:53:28 +0200 > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > It's easier to get the basics of a 2D fighter down, but mastering > something like SF, Mahvel or KOF is no easy feat. > > I find wavedashing easier than plinkdashing as an example. > > Similarly, I find staple bnbs easier in TTT than I do in 2D fighters. > > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 2d learning curve is faster than 3d. when you don't have to worry about > SS...it's pretty easy...there are a lot of tekken players who can play 2d > games...but not many 2d game players who can play tekken. because if you > don't ss in tekken or 3d games...you will die. > > When namco dumb downed the game/cut characters for T4...the lost ALL the > hardcore players ...so that was clearly not the way to go. Actually it's > the other way round. Tekken is losing casual players but hardcore players > are still playing and enjoying the game. Because with Tag partners, they > get to experiment with other characters. Once they mastered the characters > they play, they just partner their mains with other stuff to have fun. More > hardcore players are appearing in the korean scene. The korean players who > were popular in BR but isn't present now are either grown up and has to > work now or they're in the army hahaha BR some of them just stop playing > because they didn't enjoy it as much. Also they love the tagging mechanic > because they mastered that long time ago in TTT1. > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:37 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > and its still failed. > > 3d is old news. 2.5d to 2d is the way to go. > > ------------------------------ > From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:33:23 +0000 > > > Hopefully the use Tekken vs SF to test the waters a bit with possible > changes > > But yea, they need to dumb the game down somehow. > > SC5 needs to be popular lol > They did a amazing job with that game imo. Think its the right balance, > not too many characters, not too many moves etc. Much easier than tekken > to get into. > > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:26:24 +0000 > > You really think the complete failure of a game (TTT2 is dead in the > West) is simply the result of nerfing one character? > > I have no idea what Namco could do to save the Tekken series. They're > losing the hardcore players and the game's learning curve means that you're > not getting enough new players in either. Maybe they just need to reboot > the series and make some massive changes. The last time they did something > like that was T4, and while I loved the game, it wasn't exactly loved > either. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong > *Sent:* 07 February 2014 9:57 AM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > Also in BR...tier list was stupid...if you're low tier vs a top tier > bob...it's really hard to win...while TTT2 is more balanced out. > > T6BR evo is all about d+1 bob...spammable move all day...take that out? > they all quit tekken and bitch about how the new TTT2 isn't as fun hahaha > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Well, when it's best out of 5 format for top 8, it becomes a major > snorefest. > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Tekken not as fun to watch? false. lolz > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Looking good. It's sad that Tekken isn't there this year, especially > since last year was so hype with Bronson running through everyone. TTT2 > just isn't actually that exciting to watch. > > Glad Injustice is still there. KI too. > > Anyways, Nick - any luck on the venue thing for Evo weekend? Uh, you were > looking around for one, right? > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets > *Sent:* 07 February 2014 6:28 AM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > > > http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/feb/06/evo-2014-game-line-be-announced-tonight-iplaywinners-fray-catch-live-stream-here/ > > > > > > i agree with most of the line up however , to be fair , KI shouldnt be > there. its still early days and i doubt they'l be releasing extra 4 > characters befo evo. LOL @ sfxt. > BB is gna be sooo HYPE. Official EVO 2014 game line up > * Ultra Street Fighter 4 > * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 > * Injustice: Gods Among Us > * King of Fighters 13 > * Killer Instinct > * Blazblue Chrono Phantasma > * Super Smash Bros. Melee (a spot is reserved for Melee but Nintendo must > approve first. Discussions currently taking place) > > *Additional notes:* > > * Mr. Wizard stated that after EVO 2013, Tekken has dropped off a bit. > With this year being the game's 20th anniversary, the EVO team didn't want > to risk having a new version of Tekken be released, while an outdated > version is on the game line up, so the franchise was omitted this year. > > * Instead of having designated Road to EVO events, major tournaments with > a certain amount of entrants will qualify for seeding points. Tournament > organizers of majors events will have to submit results to the EVO team. > Mr. Wizard mentioned that the system is still being worked out. These > results will only apply for games on the EVO line up. > > * This year is the 20th anniversary of Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo. > Tournament of Legends will be back this year, and EVO will also be holding > the 3v3, single elimination tournament, X-Mania US, the national Super > Turbo event from Japan. > > * Exhibition matches aren't currently scheduled, but will be fit into the > line up if they can get set up. Combo videos will return if the community > makes them. > > * If Kokonoe were to stay the way she is now in Blazblue Chrono Phantasma, > she would be banned at EVO. She will be allowed however, as a patch to > balance her is incoming. > > * Developer panels will be returning this year. > > * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 will be 3 out of 5, as long as EVO doesn't > have double the entrants as last year. Other games getting 3 out of 5 in > top 8 will be dependent on how each game plays out. > > * Bring Your Own Console will be back this year, and there will be > designated areas for players who want to run side tournaments. > ------------------------------ > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 02:30:34 +0200 > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > It's like Capcom and SFIV. They own the IP, Dimps developed it. > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Xrd! > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:05:32 +0200 > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > KI is shit anyway. > > On 6 February 2014 21:26, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Handing out an Ip means you let go of the reigns. > Good luck catching the horse again. > On 6 Feb 2014 21:20, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > no , DH are just the developers of the game. > > MS asked them to make a fg . they were doing a goodjob and MS didnt like > that. sigh, now i never get to play it. its probably all downhill from here. > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 21:16:42 +0200 > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Rare owned Killer Instinct, MicroScrotums owned Rare. > Double Helix now owns Killer Instinct. > Amazon now owns Double Helix. > Sounds like a planned Coup. > On 6 Feb 2014 20:53, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > MS owns killer instinct. its not coming on ps anytime soon > ------------------------------ > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 20:38:29 +0200 > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Yeh, I was as surprised as my opponent. > No scrap that, he had the look of someone whose soul had been stolen by > Shang Tsung. > Cool guy, would've been neet if he spoke more. > But then, compared to most, I spout verbal diarrhea like Rufus - That's a > close 2nd to GB. > I called the whole Killer Instinct "buy out" when the studio was born. > Not sell on more than just 1 platform? > That's akin to game programming suicide. I expect to see the game coming > to all platforms. The great Enno has predixiated. > On 6 Feb 2014 20:06, "Jack Steel" <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Great kof 13 vid.Tht anoaxe goro combo wicked finish.greatness! > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > >