RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:57:48 +0000
Yeap
From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:56:15 +0200
Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
What's bb? blazeblue?
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But it does!
Cause im not LB
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:51:00 +0000
LOL
playing CT and a little of CS2 doesn't make you qualified.
From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:49:17 +0000
Enough = more qualified than anything LB could achieve
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:47:03 +0000
enough = under qualified
From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:45:39 +0000
Ive played enough of BB to tell you that you are mistaken
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:40:26 +0000
as the only person qualified to talk about bb here , I can safely say its more
diverse than gg's cast or any other games cast , by far.
From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:39:10 +0000
BB wishes it had GGs cast
GG cast is fucking godlike
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:28:30 +0000
I disagree, best cast of all fg belongs to bb.
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:25:28 +0200
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> GG has probably one of the best casts in any fg ever I think and
> shouldn't be changed.
>
> KI has like 5 characters and 3 of them are Jago.
> gtfo with this super demo fighter ftp bullshit and give us a full game to buy.
>
> On 07/02/2014, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > don't get me wrong , all gg's have been great. except for isuka, however,
> > making the game on a new console with better graphics is not going to save
> > the game unless they give us different chracters
> > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:18:32 +0000
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well since no one here has access to KI, the game isn't going anywhere.
> >
> >
> >
> > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of sameegh jardine
> >
> > Sent: 07 February 2014 11:15 AM
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> >
> > Xrd > KI
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:14 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > xrd is meh, theres notinhg really new.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:12:38 +0200
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > It's a given!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Xrd is the where it's at in 2014.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Im just praying that the new Guilty Gear takes off properly...
> >
> >
> >
> > I really fucking hope so
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > All you bastards better get that game :P
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:53:28 +0200
> >
> >
> >
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > It's easier to get the basics of a 2D fighter down, but mastering something
> > like SF, Mahvel or KOF is no easy feat.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I find wavedashing easier than plinkdashing as an example.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Similarly, I find staple bnbs easier in TTT than I do in 2D fighters.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2d learning curve is faster than 3d. when you don't have to worry about
> > SS...it's pretty easy...there are a lot of tekken players who can play 2d
> > games...but not many 2d game players who can play tekken. because if you
> > don't ss in tekken
> > or 3d games...you will die.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > When namco dumb downed the game/cut characters for T4...the lost ALL the
> > hardcore players ...so that was clearly not the way to go. Actually it's the
> > other way round. Tekken is losing casual players but hardcore players are
> > still playing
> > and enjoying the game. Because with Tag partners, they get to experiment
> > with other characters. Once they mastered the characters they play, they
> > just partner their mains with other stuff to have fun. More hardcore players
> > are appearing in the korean scene.
> > The korean players who were popular in BR but isn't present now are either
> > grown up and has to work now or they're in the army hahaha BR some of them
> > just stop playing because they didn't enjoy it as much. Also they love the
> > tagging mechanic because they mastered
> > that long time ago in TTT1.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:37 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > and its still failed.
> >
> >
> >
> > 3d is old news. 2.5d to 2d is the way to go.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:
> > paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:33:23 +0000
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hopefully the use Tekken vs SF to test the waters a bit with possible
> > changes
> >
> >
> >
> > But yea, they need to dumb the game down somehow.
> >
> >
> >
> > SC5 needs to be popular lol
> >
> > They did a amazing job with that game imo. Think its the right balance, not
> > too many characters, not too many moves etc. Much easier than tekken to get
> > into.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:
> > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:26:24 +0000
> >
> > You really think the complete failure of a game (TTT2 is dead in the West)
> > is simply the result of nerfing one character?
> >
> >
> >
> > I have no idea what Namco could do to save the Tekken series. They're losing
> > the hardcore players and the game's learning curve means that you're not
> > getting enough new players
> > in either. Maybe they just need to reboot the series and make some massive
> > changes. The last time they did something like that was T4, and while I
> > loved the game, it wasn't exactly loved either.
> >
> >
> >
> > From:
> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Di Lhong
> >
> > Sent: 07 February 2014 9:57 AM
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> >
> >
> > Also in BR...tier list was stupid...if you're low tier vs a top tier
> > bob...it's really hard to win...while TTT2 is more balanced out.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > T6BR evo is all about d+1 bob...spammable move all day...take that out? they
> > all quit tekken and bitch about how the new TTT2 isn't as fun hahaha
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, when it's best out of 5 format for top 8, it becomes a major
> > snorefest.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Tekken not as fun to watch? false. lolz
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair
> > <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Looking good. It's sad that Tekken isn't there this year, especially since
> > last year was so hype with Bronson running through everyone. TTT2 just isn't
> > actually
> > that exciting to watch.
> >
> >
> >
> > Glad Injustice is still there. KI too.
> >
> >
> >
> > Anyways, Nick - any luck on the venue thing for Evo weekend? Uh, you were
> > looking around for one, right?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:
> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
> >
> > Sent: 07 February 2014 6:28 AM
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/feb/06/evo-2014-game-line-be-announced-tonight-iplaywinners-fray-catch-live-stream-here/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > i agree with most of the line up however , to be fair , KI shouldnt be
> > there. its still early days and i doubt they'l be releasing extra 4
> > characters befo evo. LOL @ sfxt.
> > BB is gna be sooo HYPE.
> > Official EVO 2014 game line up
> >
> >
> > * Ultra Street Fighter 4
> >
> > * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3
> >
> > * Injustice: Gods Among Us
> >
> > * King of Fighters 13
> >
> > * Killer Instinct
> >
> > * Blazblue Chrono Phantasma
> >
> > * Super Smash Bros. Melee (a spot is reserved for Melee but Nintendo must
> > approve first. Discussions currently taking place)
> >
> >
> >
> > Additional notes:
> >
> >
> >
> > * Mr. Wizard stated that after EVO 2013, Tekken has dropped off a bit. With
> > this year being the game's 20th anniversary, the EVO team didn't want to
> > risk having a new version of Tekken be released, while an outdated version
> > is on the game line up, so the franchise
> > was omitted this year.
> >
> >
> >
> > * Instead of having designated Road to EVO events, major tournaments with a
> > certain amount of entrants will qualify for seeding points. Tournament
> > organizers of majors events will have to submit results to the EVO team. Mr.
> > Wizard mentioned that the system
> > is still being worked out. These results will only apply for games on the
> > EVO line up.
> >
> >
> >
> > * This year is the 20th anniversary of Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo.
> > Tournament of Legends will be back this year, and EVO will also be holding
> > the 3v3, single elimination tournament, X-Mania US, the national Super Turbo
> > event from Japan.
> >
> >
> >
> > * Exhibition matches aren't currently scheduled, but will be fit into the
> > line up if they can get set up. Combo videos will return if the community
> > makes them.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > * If Kokonoe were to stay the way she is now in Blazblue Chrono Phantasma,
> > she would be banned at EVO. She will be allowed however, as a patch to
> > balance her is incoming.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > * Developer panels will be returning this year.
> >
> >
> >
> > * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 will be 3 out of 5, as long as EVO doesn't
> > have double the entrants as last year. Other games getting 3 out of 5 in top
> > 8 will be dependent on how each game plays out.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > * Bring Your Own Console will be back this year, and there will be
> > designated areas for players who want to run side tournaments.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 02:30:34 +0200
> >
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > It's like Capcom and SFIV. They own the IP, Dimps developed it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Xrd!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:05:32 +0200
> >
> >
> >
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > From:
> > gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > KI is shit anyway.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6 February 2014 21:26, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Handing out an Ip means you let go of the reigns.
> >
> > Good luck catching the horse again.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6 Feb 2014 21:20, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > no , DH are just the developers of the game.
> >
> >
> >
> > MS asked them to make a fg . they were doing a goodjob and MS didnt like
> > that. sigh, now i never get to play it. its probably all downhill from here.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 21:16:42 +0200
> >
> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Rare owned Killer Instinct, MicroScrotums owned Rare.
> >
> > Double Helix now owns Killer Instinct.
> >
> > Amazon now owns Double Helix.
> >
> > Sounds like a planned Coup.
> >
> > On 6 Feb 2014 20:53, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > MS owns killer instinct. its not coming on ps anytime soon
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 20:38:29 +0200
> >
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Yeh, I was as surprised as my opponent.
> >
> > No scrap that, he had the look of someone whose soul had been stolen by
> > Shang Tsung.
> >
> > Cool guy, would've been neet if he spoke more.
> >
> > But then, compared to most, I spout verbal diarrhea like Rufus - That's a
> > close 2nd to GB.
> >
> > I called the whole Killer Instinct "buy out" when the studio was born.
> >
> > Not sell on more than just 1 platform?
> >
> > That's akin to game programming suicide. I expect to see the game coming to
> > all platforms. The great Enno has predixiated.
> >
> > On 6 Feb 2014 20:06, "Jack Steel" <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >
> >> Great kof 13 vid.Tht anoaxe goro combo wicked finish.greatness!
> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> > error, please address
> > with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender,
> > then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
> > intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action
> > taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
> > on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained
> > in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> > governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> > information in this e-mail and any attachments
> > that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given
> > nor endorsed by it.
> >
> >
> >
> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity
> > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
> > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
> > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes
> > itself as such. Information about the
> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
> > from your KPMG representative.
> >
> >
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > AntiVirus software.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> > error, please address
> > with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender,
> > then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
> > intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action
> > taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
> > on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained
> > in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> > governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> > information in this e-mail and any attachments
> > that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given
> > nor endorsed by it.
> >
> >
> >
> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity
> > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
> > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
> > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes
> > itself as such. Information about the
> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
> > from your KPMG representative.
> >
> >
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > AntiVirus software.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If
> > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and
> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject
> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
> > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of
> > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >
> >
> >
> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >
> >
> >
> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services
> > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
> > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
> > from your KPMG representative.
> >
> >
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > AntiVirus software.
> >
> =========================================================================
> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>
> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
Other related posts:
