RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:02:33 +0000
@stu , also in bb and gg, its not advisable to play who you like. its a recipe
for disaster, especially if you new to the game in general.
theres a hierarchy, playing someone like litchi from the start could can be
done but its a long and hard road. case in point , failtrtit , jumped right
into a hard to play character and failed.
I suggest trying everyone and starting with someone not as hard to learn then
continuing onwards to more complex to use characters. youl get much more out of
the game that way.
From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:57:48 +0000
Yeap
From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:56:15 +0200
Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
What's bb? blazeblue?
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But it does!
Cause im not LB
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:51:00 +0000
LOL
playing CT and a little of CS2 doesn't make you qualified.
From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:49:17 +0000
Enough = more qualified than anything LB could achieve
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:47:03 +0000
enough = under qualified
From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:45:39 +0000
Ive played enough of BB to tell you that you are mistaken
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:40:26 +0000
as the only person qualified to talk about bb here , I can safely say its more
diverse than gg's cast or any other games cast , by far.
From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:39:10 +0000
BB wishes it had GGs cast
GG cast is fucking godlike
From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:28:30 +0000
I disagree, best cast of all fg belongs to bb.
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:25:28 +0200
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> GG has probably one of the best casts in any fg ever I think and
> shouldn't be changed.
>
> KI has like 5 characters and 3 of them are Jago.
> gtfo with this super demo fighter ftp bullshit and give us a full game to buy.
>
> On 07/02/2014, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > don't get me wrong , all gg's have been great. except for isuka, however,
> > making the game on a new console with better graphics is not going to save
> > the game unless they give us different chracters
> > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:18:32 +0000
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well since no one here has access to KI, the game isn't going anywhere.
> >
> >
> >
> > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of sameegh jardine
> >
> > Sent: 07 February 2014 11:15 AM
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> >
> > Xrd > KI
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:14 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > xrd is meh, theres notinhg really new.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:12:38 +0200
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > It's a given!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Xrd is the where it's at in 2014.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Im just praying that the new Guilty Gear takes off properly...
> >
> >
> >
> > I really fucking hope so
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > All you bastards better get that game :P
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:53:28 +0200
> >
> >
> >
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > It's easier to get the basics of a 2D fighter down, but mastering something
> > like SF, Mahvel or KOF is no easy feat.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I find wavedashing easier than plinkdashing as an example.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Similarly, I find staple bnbs easier in TTT than I do in 2D fighters.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2d learning curve is faster than 3d. when you don't have to worry about
> > SS...it's pretty easy...there are a lot of tekken players who can play 2d
> > games...but not many 2d game players who can play tekken. because if you
> > don't ss in tekken
> > or 3d games...you will die.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > When namco dumb downed the game/cut characters for T4...the lost ALL the
> > hardcore players ...so that was clearly not the way to go. Actually it's the
> > other way round. Tekken is losing casual players but hardcore players are
> > still playing
> > and enjoying the game. Because with Tag partners, they get to experiment
> > with other characters. Once they mastered the characters they play, they
> > just partner their mains with other stuff to have fun. More hardcore players
> > are appearing in the korean scene.
> > The korean players who were popular in BR but isn't present now are either
> > grown up and has to work now or they're in the army hahaha BR some of them
> > just stop playing because they didn't enjoy it as much. Also they love the
> > tagging mechanic because they mastered
> > that long time ago in TTT1.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:37 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > and its still failed.
> >
> >
> >
> > 3d is old news. 2.5d to 2d is the way to go.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:
> > paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:33:23 +0000
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hopefully the use Tekken vs SF to test the waters a bit with possible
> > changes
> >
> >
> >
> > But yea, they need to dumb the game down somehow.
> >
> >
> >
> > SC5 needs to be popular lol
> >
> > They did a amazing job with that game imo. Think its the right balance, not
> > too many characters, not too many moves etc. Much easier than tekken to get
> > into.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:
> > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:26:24 +0000
> >
> > You really think the complete failure of a game (TTT2 is dead in the West)
> > is simply the result of nerfing one character?
> >
> >
> >
> > I have no idea what Namco could do to save the Tekken series. They're losing
> > the hardcore players and the game's learning curve means that you're not
> > getting enough new players
> > in either. Maybe they just need to reboot the series and make some massive
> > changes. The last time they did something like that was T4, and while I
> > loved the game, it wasn't exactly loved either.
> >
> >
> >
> > From:
> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Di Lhong
> >
> > Sent: 07 February 2014 9:57 AM
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> >
> >
> > Also in BR...tier list was stupid...if you're low tier vs a top tier
> > bob...it's really hard to win...while TTT2 is more balanced out.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > T6BR evo is all about d+1 bob...spammable move all day...take that out? they
> > all quit tekken and bitch about how the new TTT2 isn't as fun hahaha
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, when it's best out of 5 format for top 8, it becomes a major
> > snorefest.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Tekken not as fun to watch? false. lolz
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair
> > <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Looking good. It's sad that Tekken isn't there this year, especially since
> > last year was so hype with Bronson running through everyone. TTT2 just isn't
> > actually
> > that exciting to watch.
> >
> >
> >
> > Glad Injustice is still there. KI too.
> >
> >
> >
> > Anyways, Nick - any luck on the venue thing for Evo weekend? Uh, you were
> > looking around for one, right?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:
> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
> >
> > Sent: 07 February 2014 6:28 AM
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/feb/06/evo-2014-game-line-be-announced-tonight-iplaywinners-fray-catch-live-stream-here/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > i agree with most of the line up however , to be fair , KI shouldnt be
> > there. its still early days and i doubt they'l be releasing extra 4
> > characters befo evo. LOL @ sfxt.
> > BB is gna be sooo HYPE.
> > Official EVO 2014 game line up
> >
> >
> > * Ultra Street Fighter 4
> >
> > * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3
> >
> > * Injustice: Gods Among Us
> >
> > * King of Fighters 13
> >
> > * Killer Instinct
> >
> > * Blazblue Chrono Phantasma
> >
> > * Super Smash Bros. Melee (a spot is reserved for Melee but Nintendo must
> > approve first. Discussions currently taking place)
> >
> >
> >
> > Additional notes:
> >
> >
> >
> > * Mr. Wizard stated that after EVO 2013, Tekken has dropped off a bit. With
> > this year being the game's 20th anniversary, the EVO team didn't want to
> > risk having a new version of Tekken be released, while an outdated version
> > is on the game line up, so the franchise
> > was omitted this year.
> >
> >
> >
> > * Instead of having designated Road to EVO events, major tournaments with a
> > certain amount of entrants will qualify for seeding points. Tournament
> > organizers of majors events will have to submit results to the EVO team. Mr.
> > Wizard mentioned that the system
> > is still being worked out. These results will only apply for games on the
> > EVO line up.
> >
> >
> >
> > * This year is the 20th anniversary of Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo.
> > Tournament of Legends will be back this year, and EVO will also be holding
> > the 3v3, single elimination tournament, X-Mania US, the national Super Turbo
> > event from Japan.
> >
> >
> >
> > * Exhibition matches aren't currently scheduled, but will be fit into the
> > line up if they can get set up. Combo videos will return if the community
> > makes them.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > * If Kokonoe were to stay the way she is now in Blazblue Chrono Phantasma,
> > she would be banned at EVO. She will be allowed however, as a patch to
> > balance her is incoming.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > * Developer panels will be returning this year.
> >
> >
> >
> > * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 will be 3 out of 5, as long as EVO doesn't
> > have double the entrants as last year. Other games getting 3 out of 5 in top
> > 8 will be dependent on how each game plays out.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > * Bring Your Own Console will be back this year, and there will be
> > designated areas for players who want to run side tournaments.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 02:30:34 +0200
> >
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > It's like Capcom and SFIV. They own the IP, Dimps developed it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Xrd!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:05:32 +0200
> >
> >
> >
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > From:
> > gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > KI is shit anyway.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6 February 2014 21:26, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Handing out an Ip means you let go of the reigns.
> >
> > Good luck catching the horse again.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6 Feb 2014 21:20, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > no , DH are just the developers of the game.
> >
> >
> >
> > MS asked them to make a fg . they were doing a goodjob and MS didnt like
> > that. sigh, now i never get to play it. its probably all downhill from here.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 21:16:42 +0200
> >
> > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Rare owned Killer Instinct, MicroScrotums owned Rare.
> >
> > Double Helix now owns Killer Instinct.
> >
> > Amazon now owns Double Helix.
> >
> > Sounds like a planned Coup.
> >
> > On 6 Feb 2014 20:53, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > MS owns killer instinct. its not coming on ps anytime soon
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 20:38:29 +0200
> >
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >
> > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Yeh, I was as surprised as my opponent.
> >
> > No scrap that, he had the look of someone whose soul had been stolen by
> > Shang Tsung.
> >
> > Cool guy, would've been neet if he spoke more.
> >
> > But then, compared to most, I spout verbal diarrhea like Rufus - That's a
> > close 2nd to GB.
> >
> > I called the whole Killer Instinct "buy out" when the studio was born.
> >
> > Not sell on more than just 1 platform?
> >
> > That's akin to game programming suicide. I expect to see the game coming to
> > all platforms. The great Enno has predixiated.
> >
> > On 6 Feb 2014 20:06, "Jack Steel" <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >
> >> Great kof 13 vid.Tht anoaxe goro combo wicked finish.greatness!
> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> > error, please address
> > with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender,
> > then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
> > intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action
> > taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
> > on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained
> > in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> > governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> > information in this e-mail and any attachments
> > that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given
> > nor endorsed by it.
> >
> >
> >
> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity
> > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
> > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
> > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes
> > itself as such. Information about the
> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
> > from your KPMG representative.
> >
> >
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > AntiVirus software.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> > error, please address
> > with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender,
> > then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
> > intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action
> > taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
> > on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained
> > in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> > governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> > information in this e-mail and any attachments
> > that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given
> > nor endorsed by it.
> >
> >
> >
> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity
> > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
> > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
> > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes
> > itself as such. Information about the
> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
> > from your KPMG representative.
> >
> >
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > AntiVirus software.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If
> > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and
> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject
> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
> > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of
> > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >
> >
> >
> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >
> >
> >
> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services
> > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
> > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
> > from your KPMG representative.
> >
> >
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > AntiVirus software.
> >
> =========================================================================
> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>
> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
Other related posts:
