RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: Moshe Shevel <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:05:09 +0200
Potemkin!
On 07 Feb 2014 1:02 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @stu , also in bb and gg, its not advisable to play who you like. its a
> recipe for disaster, especially if you new to the game in general.
>
> theres a hierarchy, playing someone like litchi from the start could can
> be done but its a long and hard road. case in point , failtrtit , jumped
> right into a hard to play character and failed.
>
> I suggest trying everyone and starting with someone not as hard to learn
> then continuing onwards to more complex to use characters. youl get much
> more out of the game that way.
>
> ------------------------------
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:57:48 +0000
>
> Yeap
>
> ------------------------------
> From: numotd@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:56:15 +0200
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> What's bb? blazeblue?
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> But it does!
>
> Cause im not LB
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:51:00 +0000
>
>
> LOL
>
> playing CT and a little of CS2 doesn't make you qualified.
>
> ------------------------------
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:49:17 +0000
>
> Enough = more qualified than anything LB could achieve
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:47:03 +0000
>
> enough = under qualified
>
> ------------------------------
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:45:39 +0000
>
> Ive played enough of BB to tell you that you are mistaken
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:40:26 +0000
>
> as the only person qualified to talk about bb here , I can safely say its
> more diverse than gg's cast or any other games cast , by far.
>
> ------------------------------
> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:39:10 +0000
>
> BB wishes it had GGs cast
>
> GG cast is fucking godlike
>
> ------------------------------
> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:28:30 +0000
>
> I disagree, best cast of all fg belongs to bb.
>
>
>
> > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:25:28 +0200
> > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > GG has probably one of the best casts in any fg ever I think and
> > shouldn't be changed.
> >
> > KI has like 5 characters and 3 of them are Jago.
> > gtfo with this super demo fighter ftp bullshit and give us a full game
> to buy.
> >
> > On 07/02/2014, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > don't get me wrong , all gg's have been great. except for isuka,
> however,
> > > making the game on a new console with better graphics is not going to
> save
> > > the game unless they give us different chracters
> > > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:18:32 +0000
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Well since no one here has access to KI, the game isn't going anywhere.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > On Behalf Of sameegh jardine
> > >
> > > Sent: 07 February 2014 11:15 AM
> > >
> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > >
> > >
> > > Xrd > KI
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:14 AM, lindsey kiviets <
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > xrd is meh, theres notinhg really new.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:12:38 +0200
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > >
> > > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > It's a given!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Xrd is the where it's at in 2014.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Im just praying that the new Guilty Gear takes off properly...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I really fucking hope so
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > All you bastards better get that game :P
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:53:28 +0200
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > >
> > > From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It's easier to get the basics of a 2D fighter down, but mastering
> something
> > > like SF, Mahvel or KOF is no easy feat.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I find wavedashing easier than plinkdashing as an example.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Similarly, I find staple bnbs easier in TTT than I do in 2D fighters.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > 2d learning curve is faster than 3d. when you don't have to worry about
> > > SS...it's pretty easy...there are a lot of tekken players who can play
> 2d
> > > games...but not many 2d game players who can play tekken. because if
> you
> > > don't ss in tekken
> > > or 3d games...you will die.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > When namco dumb downed the game/cut characters for T4...the lost ALL
> the
> > > hardcore players ...so that was clearly not the way to go. Actually
> it's the
> > > other way round. Tekken is losing casual players but hardcore players
> are
> > > still playing
> > > and enjoying the game. Because with Tag partners, they get to
> experiment
> > > with other characters. Once they mastered the characters they play,
> they
> > > just partner their mains with other stuff to have fun. More hardcore
> players
> > > are appearing in the korean scene.
> > > The korean players who were popular in BR but isn't present now are
> either
> > > grown up and has to work now or they're in the army hahaha BR some of
> them
> > > just stop playing because they didn't enjoy it as much. Also they love
> the
> > > tagging mechanic because they mastered
> > > that long time ago in TTT1.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:37 AM, lindsey kiviets <
> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > and its still failed.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 3d is old news. 2.5d to 2d is the way to go.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From:
> > > paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > >
> > > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:33:23 +0000
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hopefully the use Tekken vs SF to test the waters a bit with possible
> > > changes
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > But yea, they need to dumb the game down somehow.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > SC5 needs to be popular lol
> > >
> > > They did a amazing job with that game imo. Think its the right
> balance, not
> > > too many characters, not too many moves etc. Much easier than tekken
> to get
> > > into.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From:
> > > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > >
> > > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 08:26:24 +0000
> > >
> > > You really think the complete failure of a game (TTT2 is dead in the
> West)
> > > is simply the result of nerfing one character?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I have no idea what Namco could do to save the Tekken series. They're
> losing
> > > the hardcore players and the game's learning curve means that you're
> not
> > > getting enough new players
> > > in either. Maybe they just need to reboot the series and make some
> massive
> > > changes. The last time they did something like that was T4, and while I
> > > loved the game, it wasn't exactly loved either.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From:
> > > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > On Behalf Of Di Lhong
> > >
> > > Sent: 07 February 2014 9:57 AM
> > >
> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Also in BR...tier list was stupid...if you're low tier vs a top tier
> > > bob...it's really hard to win...while TTT2 is more balanced out.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > T6BR evo is all about d+1 bob...spammable move all day...take that
> out? they
> > > all quit tekken and bitch about how the new TTT2 isn't as fun hahaha
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, when it's best out of 5 format for top 8, it becomes a major
> > > snorefest.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Tekken not as fun to watch? false. lolz
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair
> > > <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Looking good. It's sad that Tekken isn't there this year, especially
> since
> > > last year was so hype with Bronson running through everyone. TTT2 just
> isn't
> > > actually
> > > that exciting to watch.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Glad Injustice is still there. KI too.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Anyways, Nick - any luck on the venue thing for Evo weekend? Uh, you
> were
> > > looking around for one, right?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From:
> > > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
> > >
> > > Sent: 07 February 2014 6:28 AM
> > >
> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2014/feb/06/evo-2014-game-line-be-announced-tonight-iplaywinners-fray-catch-live-stream-here/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > i agree with most of the line up however , to be fair , KI shouldnt be
> > > there. its still early days and i doubt they'l be releasing extra 4
> > > characters befo evo. LOL @ sfxt.
> > > BB is gna be sooo HYPE.
> > > Official EVO 2014 game line up
> > >
> > >
> > > * Ultra Street Fighter 4
> > >
> > > * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3
> > >
> > > * Injustice: Gods Among Us
> > >
> > > * King of Fighters 13
> > >
> > > * Killer Instinct
> > >
> > > * Blazblue Chrono Phantasma
> > >
> > > * Super Smash Bros. Melee (a spot is reserved for Melee but Nintendo
> must
> > > approve first. Discussions currently taking place)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Additional notes:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > * Mr. Wizard stated that after EVO 2013, Tekken has dropped off a bit.
> With
> > > this year being the game's 20th anniversary, the EVO team didn't want
> to
> > > risk having a new version of Tekken be released, while an outdated
> version
> > > is on the game line up, so the franchise
> > > was omitted this year.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > * Instead of having designated Road to EVO events, major tournaments
> with a
> > > certain amount of entrants will qualify for seeding points. Tournament
> > > organizers of majors events will have to submit results to the EVO
> team. Mr.
> > > Wizard mentioned that the system
> > > is still being worked out. These results will only apply for games on
> the
> > > EVO line up.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > * This year is the 20th anniversary of Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo.
> > > Tournament of Legends will be back this year, and EVO will also be
> holding
> > > the 3v3, single elimination tournament, X-Mania US, the national Super
> Turbo
> > > event from Japan.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > * Exhibition matches aren't currently scheduled, but will be fit into
> the
> > > line up if they can get set up. Combo videos will return if the
> community
> > > makes them.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > * If Kokonoe were to stay the way she is now in Blazblue Chrono
> Phantasma,
> > > she would be banned at EVO. She will be allowed however, as a patch to
> > > balance her is incoming.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > * Developer panels will be returning this year.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > * Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 will be 3 out of 5, as long as EVO
> doesn't
> > > have double the entrants as last year. Other games getting 3 out of 5
> in top
> > > 8 will be dependent on how each game plays out.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > * Bring Your Own Console will be back this year, and there will be
> > > designated areas for players who want to run side tournaments.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 02:30:34 +0200
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > >
> > > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > It's like Capcom and SFIV. They own the IP, Dimps developed it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Xrd!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:05:32 +0200
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > >
> > > From:
> > > gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > KI is shit anyway.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6 February 2014 21:26, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Handing out an Ip means you let go of the reigns.
> > >
> > > Good luck catching the horse again.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6 Feb 2014 21:20, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > no , DH are just the developers of the game.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > MS asked them to make a fg . they were doing a goodjob and MS didnt
> like
> > > that. sigh, now i never get to play it. its probably all downhill from
> here.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 21:16:42 +0200
> > >
> > > Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > >
> > > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Rare owned Killer Instinct, MicroScrotums owned Rare.
> > >
> > > Double Helix now owns Killer Instinct.
> > >
> > > Amazon now owns Double Helix.
> > >
> > > Sounds like a planned Coup.
> > >
> > > On 6 Feb 2014 20:53, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > MS owns killer instinct. its not coming on ps anytime soon
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 20:38:29 +0200
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> > >
> > > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Yeh, I was as surprised as my opponent.
> > >
> > > No scrap that, he had the look of someone whose soul had been stolen by
> > > Shang Tsung.
> > >
> > > Cool guy, would've been neet if he spoke more.
> > >
> > > But then, compared to most, I spout verbal diarrhea like Rufus -
> That's a
> > > close 2nd to GB.
> > >
> > > I called the whole Killer Instinct "buy out" when the studio was born.
> > >
> > > Not sell on more than just 1 platform?
> > >
> > > That's akin to game programming suicide. I expect to see the game
> coming to
> > > all platforms. The great Enno has predixiated.
> > >
> > > On 6 Feb 2014 20:06, "Jack Steel" <orichih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >
> > >> Great kof 13 vid.Tht anoaxe goro combo wicked finish.greatness!
> > >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> e-mail
> > > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
> communication in
> > > error, please address
> > > with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
> sender,
> > > then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
> > > intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action
> > > taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
> > > on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice
> contained
> > > in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> > > governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and
> other
> > > information in this e-mail and any attachments
> > > that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither
> given
> > > nor endorsed by it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> error-free,
> > > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
> destroyed,
> > > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> services
> > > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> Swiss
> > > entity that serves as a coordinating entity
> > > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
> > > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
> > > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each
> describes
> > > itself as such. Information about the
> > > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained
> > > from your KPMG representative.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > > AntiVirus software.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> e-mail
> > > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
> communication in
> > > error, please address
> > > with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
> sender,
> > > then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
> > > intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action
> > > taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
> > > on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice
> contained
> > > in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> > > governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and
> other
> > > information in this e-mail and any attachments
> > > that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither
> given
> > > nor endorsed by it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> error-free,
> > > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
> destroyed,
> > > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> services
> > > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> Swiss
> > > entity that serves as a coordinating entity
> > > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
> > > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
> > > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each
> describes
> > > itself as such. Information about the
> > > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained
> > > from your KPMG representative.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > > AntiVirus software.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> e-mail
> > > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
> communication in
> > > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
> send to
> > > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
> it. If
> > > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or
> > > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
> prohibited and
> > > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
> subject
> > > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
> > > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
> > > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business
> of
> > > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> error-free,
> > > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
> destroyed,
> > > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> services
> > > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> Swiss
> > > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
> independent
> > > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services
> > > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and
> > > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about
> the
> > > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained
> > > from your KPMG representative.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > > AntiVirus software.
> > >
> > =========================================================================
> > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
> >
> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>
>
>
Other related posts:
