[ciscomgr] Re: possible new @'s
- From: Merlin Gillespie <mgillespie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: ciscomgr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 11:27:56 +0000
On Tuesday 01 Oct 2002 6:41 am, you wrote:
> so since nobody really seems to understand why serial1 currently is an =
@
> what do we do about it ?
If he/she is a she, then I think that he/she deserves it, if he/sh is a h=
e=20
then I think that he/she should be questioned about whether he/she has=20
sisters, and then unless he/she has many that are free and easy he/she sh=
ould=20
be zapped!
> another occurance of timezone issues... agreed mirco does not talk much
> but when he does its prolly when you people are sleeping and us jewro
> trashies are trying to wake the fuck up etc... he'd be a networking dud=
e
> working in switzerland with much more clue than your average #cisco @ .=
=2E.
Mirco seems pretty cool, for a person from switzerland, I like him, he ta=
lks=20
about stuff that relates to service providers, rather than stuff that rel=
ates=20
to certificates etc. and seems to know his shit.
> no way no... :) But uhmm is there a technical reason for needing 2 logi=
ns
> nowaddays that X allows multiple logins etc ? eye am easily confused...
cybersex, you have to stoop to subterfuge to do it properly and have peop=
le=20
think you're someone else.
> cool... or maybe we need strictops again... why is he all the time @'ed
> when he is not an @ ? I dont think i added him to ciscoops list yet but=
im
> sure i would have if he had been awake when i asked @'s to tell me thei=
r
> email addy...
usmc - fairly cool and knows a little bit, I thought everyone was pished =
at=20
him though?!? didn't he get all peckerwood?
> if we have reached out maximum channel size for current undernet
> population then i guess not... of course it is unfair to have clued peo=
ple
> remain @'less while at the same time having unclued nontalking people l=
ike
> serial1 @'ed and telling those clued people that they cant be @ just
> because of some ratio thing...
we could start giving regulars that don't suck automode voice?=20
ratios don't bother me, so long as the ratio of ops:nonops is roughly=20
proportional to the ratio of nice/clever people:$nice/clever people
cheers,
m.
p.s that email was entirely too serious, I must lower the tone:
www.shitcity.com
www.goatse.cx
www.ratemypoo.com
--=20
+--
Merlin Gillespie..........................Unmetered & ADSL solutions
Senior Network Engineer..........................for Home & Business
PlusNet Technologies Ltd.........................http://www.plus.net
+----------- My Referrals - It pays to recommend PlusNet -----------+
Other related posts:
