> >1) slowly ciscoops list is filling up, i think nobody >important is missing anymore, the people comming to mind >that are not on yet are: >jd, jbj, usmc, tavi (there are others but those really dont need >to be on since they almost never are around and should maybe even be >retired from X to be replaced by more active people...) >And uhmm out of those usmc and i suppose our friend jd (:)) are the most >important to be added since the others are not really the most active >people... add em anyway to said list? >2) maybe any of us would like to propose possible new @'s ? >One person who i see as clued and nice is mirco, definitively above >average clued and will prolly never ask by himself to be @'ed. who is mirco? (seriously) >3) see 1), i think we should remove some @'s who are never around >and if they are they are either not in #cisco or if they are they'd >never talk... >The following names come to mind when talking about unactive/useless >@'s (some of them i might be wrong >about due to timezone issues so please correct me if i am wrong...): >rickgid >egami >pomol >serial1 >mikek (who is that ?) >snapdad NUKE DESTROY DELETE RM -RF / i say ;) (footnote: is rickgid = rickster? or some other lemur?) >Any ideas/thoughts/comments ? swedish schoolgirl twins? :( >p.s: who is buddgreen and why does he/it have level 269 which is clearly >reserved to horny and/or sexxy females who deliver pr0n or sexual >fantasies of some kind ? aint that joey? (course he aint a female, horndog perhaps but def. not femail) V