[ciscomgr] Re: possible new @'s ?

  • From: Vibhu <needforspeed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: ciscomgr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:17:23 -0400

>1) slowly ciscoops list is filling up, i think nobody
>important is missing anymore, the people comming to mind
>that are not on yet are:
>jd, jbj, usmc, tavi (there are others but those really dont need
>to be on since they almost never are around and should maybe even be
>retired from X to be replaced by more active people...)
>And uhmm out of those usmc and i suppose our friend jd (:)) are the most
>important to be added since the others are not really the most active

add em anyway to said list?

>2) maybe any of us would like to propose possible new @'s ?
>One person who i see as clued and nice is mirco, definitively above
>average clued and will prolly never ask by himself to be @'ed.

who is mirco? (seriously)

>3) see 1), i think we should remove some @'s who are never around
>and if they are they are either not in #cisco or if they are they'd
>never talk...
>The following names come to mind when talking about unactive/useless
>@'s (some of them i might be wrong
>about due to timezone issues so please correct me if i am wrong...):
>mikek (who is that ?)

(footnote: is rickgid = rickster? or some other lemur?)

>Any ideas/thoughts/comments ?

swedish schoolgirl twins? :(

>p.s: who is buddgreen and why does he/it have level 269 which is clearly
>reserved to horny and/or sexxy females who deliver pr0n or sexual
>fantasies of some kind ?

aint that joey? (course he aint a female, horndog perhaps but def. not femail)


Other related posts: