[ciscomgr] Re: possible new @'s ?
- From: Merlin Gillespie <mgillespie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: ciscomgr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:00:28 +0000
On Monday 30 Sep 2002 4:45 pm, you wrote:
a:
> gene.kenney@xxxxxxxxxxxx unsubscribed from list ciscomgr
> Command came from: tlv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
who the hell was that?!?!?
> The following names come to mind when talking about unactive/useless
> @'s (some of them i might be wrong
> about due to timezone issues so please correct me if i am wrong...):
> rickgid: rick used to be cool but then he fucked off
> egami: ditto
> pomol: he comes around sometimes, dunno who he is tho..
> serial1: I still have no fucking clue who that is
> mikek (who is that ?) Isn't that ciscokid?
> snapdad: what happened to that fucker?
> Any ideas/thoughts/comments ?
The people who don't hang around it obviously doesn't really affect if th=
ey=20
have access or not, the people who don't hang around, I don't see any=20
problem in removing, we can always add em back in if they come back...
people that do hang around, but the people who are around, but NEVER TALK=
!!!
e.g serial1 who is always about.. but I have never seen talk.... it might=
just=20
be me that has never seen he/she talk..dunno, second thoughts?
> p.s: who is buddgreen and why does he/it have level 269 which is clearl=
y
> reserved to horny and/or sexxy females who deliver pr0n or sexual
> fantasies of some kind ?
That's joe isn't it?
--=20
+--
Merlin Gillespie..........................Unmetered & ADSL solutions
Senior Network Engineer..........................for Home & Business
PlusNet Technologies Ltd.........................http://www.plus.net
+----------- My Referrals - It pays to recommend PlusNet -----------+
Other related posts:
