[ciscomgr] Re: possible new @'s ?

  • From: Merlin Gillespie <mgillespie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: ciscomgr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:00:28 +0000

On Monday 30 Sep 2002 4:45 pm, you wrote:

> gene.kenney@xxxxxxxxxxxx unsubscribed from list ciscomgr
> Command came from: tlv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

who the hell was that?!?!?

> The following names come to mind when talking about unactive/useless
> @'s (some of them i might be wrong
> about due to timezone issues so please correct me if i am wrong...):

> rickgid: rick used to be cool but then he fucked off
> egami: ditto
> pomol: he comes around sometimes, dunno who he is tho..
> serial1: I still have no fucking clue who that is
> mikek (who is that ?) Isn't that ciscokid?
> snapdad: what happened to that fucker?

> Any ideas/thoughts/comments ?

The people who don't hang around it obviously doesn't really affect if th=
have access or not,  the people who don't hang around, I don't see any=20
problem in removing, we can always add em back in if they come back...
people that do hang around, but the people who are around, but NEVER TALK=
e.g serial1 who is always about.. but I have never seen talk.... it might=
be me that has never seen he/she talk..dunno, second thoughts?

> p.s: who is buddgreen and why does he/it have level 269 which is clearl=
> reserved to horny and/or sexxy females who deliver pr0n or sexual
> fantasies of some kind ?

That's joe isn't it?

 Merlin Gillespie..........................Unmetered & ADSL solutions
 Senior Network Engineer..........................for Home & Business
 PlusNet Technologies Ltd.........................http://www.plus.net
+----------- My Referrals - It pays to recommend PlusNet -----------+

Other related posts: