> Linux would not be taking over the world without the=20 > stability, speed,=20 > extendability, and power provided by its design and=20 > implementation. If this=20 > system does the same thing for cad/engineering software that=20 > linux has done=20 > for operating systems, the interest will be there from large=20 > and small=20 > companies, users and developers. It's not just the technical merits of Linux that are leading people to use it. There are two other things as well. (just thought I would throw this out there. I'm sure everyone that has been in this conversation understands what I'm talking about here, but others, who are only reading, might not.) For me, the technical merits take a backseat to the value (it lets you do a whole lot more with a whole lot less) and the lesser Risk (no vendor to die off in the future or to sue you out of existence for misusing their product). Seeing that I'm an Architect, I don't have a ton of money to spend on IT. If I can set up a server using an old computer for free that can compete with a new server running expensive Windows software, then boy howdy, I'm gonna do it and save that money for something else (like eating). Also, as an Architect, I'm legally responsible for the long term for everything I say and do (like a Engineer, Lawyer, or Doctor is). If I can't open a file in the future because some software company has decided to change the format, and that one file (due to the original print being lost) was going to save my rear in a lawsuit, then whatever that software package was just cost me a whole heck of a lot more than the price on it's box in the store. Also, as an Architect, I'll probably always be in the small business world. While a larger company could survive a BSA audit; I would not be able to, and could very well loose by whole business over something like that. So for me, Linux and Open Source software is more about value and minimizing risk; the fact that it does certain things better is really just icing on the cake, so to speak. Jeffrey=20