[bookport] Re: new unit proposal
- From: "Kevin Jones" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 17:12:47 -0500
just a basic calculator would be fine most of us carry it with us everywhere
right? so -- if you really need a more powerful calculator then get an hp or
something
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Margo and elmo
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 5:07 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal
But cell phones aren't flaky with all their stuff in them.
Margo and Elmo
----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Ring
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 5:58 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal
Yes, and they have copier, printer and scanner all-in-ones.
And, I have never seen a device that can be more flakey and more
problematic for those who intend to do OCR.
In my opinion, not a successful meld.
It isn't the calculator I object to, It is the constant layering of
features for the sake of features.
So, what kind of calculator?
Scientific, financial, what about a graphing calculator, that I've tot
to see!
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gary King
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 4:48 PM
To: Book Port List
Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal
By the same reasoning, a cell phone is primarily for making and
receiving
calls, but cell phone manufacturers and third-party programmers continue
to
think of ways to make them more useful, resulting in more unit sales.
If a
useful feature such as a calculator is possible within the present
limitations of the firmware and processor, then why not?
Gary King, w4wkz@xxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Ring" <ring.richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 4:00 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal
> My only question is, is the Bookport a device whose design is
primarily
> for reading either audio or text?
> If so, what does a calculator have to do with reading?
> Supporting larger audio/mp3 files, that makes sense.
> Faster processing of audio files by the transfer tool, that makes
sense.
> A calculator simply doesn't seem to fit the purpose for the device.
> I could even see an alarm feature, since reading is such a wonderful
> escape.
> One might wish to have an alarm to advise you that you've read long
> enough and that it is time to do some real work!
> (smile)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of LARRY SKUTCHAN
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 2:01 PM
> To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal
>
>
> No, it would not increase the price nor hinder any other function in
any
> way.
>
>
> >>> slicht@xxxxxxxxx Thursday, September 15, 2005 12:18:35 PM >>>
> I'll answer your question with a question. What about it, Larry,
> Pamela,
> Rob? Would a calculator increase BP's price or hinder the firmware in
> any
> way? If not, I guess it would be okay to have. My math is so bad, I
> might
> even use it once in a blue moon.
>
> At 10:37 AM 9/15/2005, you wrote:
> >Here's my question to you. First of all, I don't care about a
> calculator
> >myself. But: If a calculator were added, if the calculator did not
> >increase the price, if other functionality were not impaired, would
> you
> >have any objection to its being there? I ask this because, on the
Book
>
> >Courier list, someone was saying that one of the benefits of the BC
of
> the
> >BP was that the BC doesn't have a notetaker function, which that
> person
> >doesn't need. To which my response would be, As long as it doesn't
get
> in
> >the way, what's the problem with having it there? I say the same
thing
>
> >about a calculator feature which, as I've said, I can take or leave.
> If a
> >calculator function will increase the price, that's another issue, or
> if
> >it will decrease room for firmware revisions that would enhancing the
> book
> >reading experience, that's another story as well. But if any given
> feature
> >does not get in one's way, why not include it? I'm not referring to
> anyone
> >here specificaly, but the attitude I see time and time again on the
> >various lists I'm on is that "if I don't use it, it's a bad idea."
> That's
> >why descriptive video is not as prevalent, especially in the States,
> as it
> >should be.
> >
> >Bruce
> >
> >--
> >Bruce Toews
> >E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: dogriver@xxxxxxxx
> >Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries):
> http://www.ogts.net
> >Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com
> >
> >On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Sandy Licht wrote:
> >
> >>This is my opinion, and I'm not putting anyone down for thinking
> >>differently. I don't like the calculator idea at all. Talking
> >>calculators are relatively inexpensive.
> >>
> >>At 08:48 AM 9/15/2005, you wrote:
> >>>I like the calculator idea. I think the synthesizer idea has
> outlived
> >>>its usefulness with all the speech programs I know of installing
> their
> >>>own software speech these days.
> >>>
> >>>On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:22:13 -0500, you wrote:
> >>> > Think of how much more useful the unit could be. I know
> doubletalk would
> >>> > probably charge money for the synth option, but it could all be
> done in
> >>> > firmware, maybe there could be a special firmware users would
> have to pay
> >>> > for if they wanted the synth.
> >>> > The calculator I think should be more considered, it would
hardly
>
> >>> take > any
> >>> > extra space nor time to develop at least a simple one; and we
all
>
> >>> could > use
> >>> > a calculator now and then.
> >>> > > > -----Original Message-----
> >>> > From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> >>> [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>> > On Behalf Of David Allen
> >>> > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 5:57 AM
> >>> > To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> > Subject: [bookport] Re: new unit proposal
> >>> > > Hi Kevin and list:
> >>> > > Yes, both have been thought of. Neither is justified in the
> context
> >>> of a
> >>> > portable device whose reason for being is to read books. If you
> >>> still > need a
> >>> > > USB synthesiser, it is available as the Tripple talk.
> >>> > > Cheers,
> >>> > Dave
> >>> > >
> >>
> >>Sandy Licht
> >>Phone: 409-898-8218
> >>Jeremiah 29:11 - 14A
> >>11For I know the plans I have for you," says the LORD. "They
> >>are plans for good and not for disaster, to give you a future and a
> hope.
> >>12In those days when you pray, I will listen. 13If you look for me
in
> earnest,
> >>you will find me when you seek me. 14I will be found by you," says
> the
> >>LORD...
> >>
>
> Sandy Licht
> Phone: 409-898-8218
> Jeremiah 29:11 - 14A
> 11For I know the plans I have for you," says the LORD. "They
> are plans for good and not for disaster, to give you a future and a
> hope.
> 12In those days when you pray, I will listen. 13If you look for me in
> earnest,
> you will find me when you seek me. 14I will be found by you," says the
>
> LORD...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.25/102 - Release Date:
9/14/05
>
>
Other related posts:
