[bookport] Re: new unit proposal
- From: "Jerry Weinger" <jnweinger@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:29:17 -0400
Tom and List,
My hope is that the Book Port evolves based upon its ability to read books,
its small size, and its reasonable cost.
Here is why I bought the Book Port
1. I can read a book, in all of the formats, with a device that fits into my
pocket. And I can have 100 more books on hand, in my other pocket. Doing
this with a CD player would require a larger CD player, and a stack of CDs.
2. The Book Port uses inexpensive off the shelf batteries, which I can
replace myself.
3. I had no further expectations for the Book Port; any more than I would
expect a hammer to do the job of a drill.
Sincerely,
Jerry Weinger
_____
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of tom hawkins
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 8:29 PM
To: Book Port
Subject: [bookport] new unit proposal
Any consideration of a new unit should include a wide, thick rubber edge
to protect the unit from accidental falls from tables and pockets etc.
Other related posts:
