[bksvol-discuss] Re: Efficient Way To Treat/Include Footnote References

  • From: Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 22:18:02 -0700 (PDT)

you're doing double work.  It's nice of you, but shouldn't be  necessary. smile

Cindy
Join us in celebrating our 10th Anniversary! 

TinyURL.com/752cyrs
 
  




>________________________________
> From: Vivian Flores <vivian@xxxxxxxx>
>To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 8:28 PM
>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Efficient Way To Treat/Include  Footnote 
>References
> 
>
>Hi Cindy;
>
>I kept the footnotes where it was in the book, but add a space then the
number in parens, and then superscript including parens. Hope this
helps.
>
>Vivian
>
>
>At 06:55 PM 3/18/2012 -0700, you wrote:
>
>oh, dear. I'd better check with
Carrie. I'll soon be doing another big nonfiction and was planning to
superscript the footnotes. You say  Vivian put the numbers in parens
at the end of the sentence, on the same line as the text? I  guess
if those are the only ones that show up, I'll have to do that,
too
>>
>>
>> 
>>Cindy
>>Join
us in celebrating our
10thAnniversary! 
>>
>>
>>TinyURL.com/752cyrs
>>
>> 
>>  
>>
>>
>>
>>>From: Valerie Maples
<vlmaples@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>>I downloaded both of your books, but I hate to tell you the footnotes
(or whatever) are not super scripted, nor bracketed in anyway.  Just
a number at the end of a sentence.  It worked for Vivian, though, so
I am hoping maybe she can tell you something she does different. 
Maybe it is because she had parens around hers?
>>> 
>>>Valerie
>>>
>>>Join us in celebrating our 10th Anniversary!
>>>Bookshare: Bringing Reading to Life for 10 Years
>>>http://www.bookshare.org/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>From:Cindy
<popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>Cc: Valerie Maples <vlmaples@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>Sent: Sun, March 18, 2012 6:07:32 PM
>>>>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Efficient Way To Treat/Include
Footnote References
>>>>
>>>>Empire of Liberty by Gordon S. Wood
>>>>A World at Arms: A Global History of World War
II       
by      Gerhard L. Weinberg
>>>>
>>>>If you're not finding them by  special Search or regular search, be
sure language is not U.S. but every, and that PQ and all quality squares
are blank. The language is British, not U.s.; the only way I found a book
I just uploaded was to be sure I changed language to Any and unchecked
all the quality squares.
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>>Cindy
>>>>Join
us in celebrating our
10thAnniversary! 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>TinyURL.com/752cyrs
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>From: Valerie Maples <vlmaples@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>>>>Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 10:54 PM
>>>>>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Efficient Way To Treat/Include
Footnote References
>>>>>
>>>>>I didn't find that book in the collection, Cindy.
>>>>> 
>>>>>Valerie
>>>>>
>>>>>Join us in celebrating our 10th Anniversary!
>>>>>Bookshare: Bringing Reading to Life for 10 Years
>>>>>http://www.bookshare.org/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>From: Cindy
<popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>Sent: Sun, March 18, 2012 12:06:27 AM
>>>>>>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Efficient Way To Treat/Include
Footnote References
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic,
1789-1815            
Gordon S. Wood 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Here is a book I proofed in Word and put the footnote numbers in
superscript. I saved in rtf to upload it.
>>>>>>If you find out that he superscript numbers aren't saved, please let me
know so I don't waste time  doing it any more
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>Cindy
>>>>>>Join
us in celebrating our
10thAnniversary! 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>TinyURL.com/752cyrs
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>From: Valerie Maples <vlmaples@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>>>>>>Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 8:55 PM
>>>>>>>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Efficient Way To Treat/Include
Footnote References
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I didn't realize the tool preserved subscript and superscript.  Does
someone 
>>>>>>>have a book suggestion I can look at so I can see how they are handled
and if 
>>>>>>>they are the same as in Word.  Just curious, you know. 
LOL
>>>>>>>Valerie
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Join us in celebrating our 10th Anniversary!
>>>>>>>Bookshare: Bringing Reading to Life for 10 Years
>>>>>>>http://www.bookshare.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>----- Original Message ----
>>>>>>>> From: Cindy
<popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> To:
"bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Sat, March 17, 2012 9:36:59 PM
>>>>>>>> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Efficient Way To Treat/Include
Footnote 
>>>>>>>>References
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Kane, what's the book, and how long is it? I like proofing
biographies  and I 
>>>>>>>>actually enjoy footnotes. I enjoy putting them in superscript; As
sighted  
>>>>>>>>person I find them much less confusing when reading a book than when
they're in  
>>>>>>>>brackets or on the line above the line of text in regular fonts. I
probably  
>>>>>>>>sounds odd (some of us proofreaders are odd, smile) but I find the
file with  
>>>>>>>>proper footnotes aesthetically pleasing. Some scanners of books I've
proofed  
>>>>>>>>have carefully raised the number to the l line above (format, font,
character  
>>>>>>>>position, raise) then  put in how much in the space. I don't
remember what  
>>>>>>>>they've put there. Maybe .3 or 3. Ican't tell by sight if they are
actually on  
>>>>>>>>the proper line so I change them to superscript; sometimes, too, the
scanner has  
>>>>>>>>forgotten to raise the number  part way through, and sometimes a
numeral , is  
>>>>>>>>too large  2, 8,9 to fit comfortably on the proper line.I've
learned to make  
>>>>>>>>them superscript from the
>>>>>>>>  beginning rather than leaving what I think is o.k.  and
then finding I need 
>>>>>>>>(want) to go back and change them).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> TinyURL.com/752cyrs
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> >________________________________
>>>>>>>> >  From: Mayrie ReNae
<mayrierenae@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> >To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>>>>>>> >Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 4:02 PM
>>>>>>>> >Subject: [bksvol-discuss]  Re: Efficient Way To Treat/Include 
>>>>>>>> >Footnote 
>>>>>>>>References
>>>>>>>> > 
>>>>>>>> >Hi  Kane,
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >You can leave the handling of footnotes for the  proofreader, as this 
>>>>>>>> >is a
>>>>>>>> >proofreading task technically. However, please  don't get rid of your 
>>>>>>>> >print
>>>>>>>> >copy of the book until the book has been  added to the Bookshare 
>>>>>>>> >collection.
>>>>>>>> >The person who chooses to proofread it  may need to contact you to 
>>>>>>>> >verify or
>>>>>>>> >clarify accuracy of text, and a book  with footnotes as you describe 
>>>>>>>> >is
>>>>>>>> >likely to spark lots and lots of  clarifying questions from a 
>>>>>>>> >proofreader
>>>>>>>> >trying to give Bookshare patrons  the cleanest and most accurate 
>>>>>>>> >reading
>>>>>>>> >experience  possible.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >I have no idea whether there is a way to change super  or subscripted 
>>>>>>>> >text to
>>>>>>>> >sit where regular text does when using Kurzweil  1000.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >There isn't a quick way to handle footnotes properly to  have them 
>>>>>>>> >read
>>>>>>>> >accurately for Bookshare submissions.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >Sorry  I haven't been of more help.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >It's great to have you volunteering  with us, and thanks for having 
>>>>>>>> >such
>>>>>>>> >great attention to details!  That  kind of thing is very much 
>>>>>>>> >appreciated!
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >Happy  scanning.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >Mayrie
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >-----Original  Message-----
>>>>>>>> >From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> >[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] ; On Behalf Of Kane Brolin
>>>>>>>> >Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 12:24  PM
>>>>>>>> >To: Kurzweil 1000 Discussion List; bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> >Subject:  [bksvol-discuss] Efficient Way To Treat/Include Footnote  
>>>>>>>References
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >Hello.  I'm attempting to finish scanning my  first-ever Bookshare
>>>>>>>> >contribution: a nonfiction biographical work that  includes a lot of
>>>>>>>> >citations.  These citations exist primarily in the form  of endnotes; 
>>>>>>>> >but of
>>>>>>>> >course the numbering of these endnotes is visible  throughout each 
>>>>>>>> >page.  I'm
>>>>>>>> >trying to figure out an efficient way to mark  these up in Kurzweil 
>>>>>>>> >1000 so I
>>>>>>>> >don't have to spend endless time reading  the entire book on my PC, 
>>>>>>>> >placing
>>>>>>>> >each number citation in the right  syntax manually.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >When I looked through the Bookshare Volunteers'  manual, I found the
>>>>>>>> >following reference on such citations:
>>>>>>>> >https://wiki.benetech.org/display/BSO/4.8+C.+Footnotes%2C+Superscripts+and+S
>>>>>>>> >ubscripts%2C+and+Sidebars.
>>>>>>>> >It  says that square brackets should go around each of these  citation
>>>>>>>> >numbers within the body of the text.  It also says, though, that  OCR
>>>>>>>> >software has a "global drop" feature that can be invoked to cause  all
>>>>>>>> >superscripted text to be lowered visually to the same height as the  
>>>>>>>> >body of
>>>>>>>> >the document.  But I don't know how this would work in Kurzweil  
>>>>>>>> >1000, or if
>>>>>>>> >there is any efficient way to adjust or standardize citations  of 
>>>>>>>> >this kind
>>>>>>>> >that will permit me to complete scanning this accurately  without 
>>>>>>>> >taking a
>>>>>>>> >whole year to scan this book.  In some cases, I've  counted as many 
>>>>>>>> >as 20
>>>>>>>> >citations on one page.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >Thanks for  any advice you can provide.  I've written this to both the
>>>>>>>> >Kurzweil 1000  discussion list and the Kurzweil Volunteers' 
>>>>>>>> >discussion  list.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >Kind regards,
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >Kane Brolin
>>>
>
>

Other related posts: