[AZ-Observing] Re: Refractor Comparison
- From: "Stanley A. Gorodenski" <stan_gorodenski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:28:27 -0800
Jeff Hopkins wrote:
>Back to Stan's dilemma, I think if he want to attend events where
>solar system objects or double stars re view, a refractor will be
>great. If he wants to use the telescope at dark sky star parties, a
>larger DOB would be a better choice.
>
>
>
Well, actually my dilemma is not whether I want a telescope to attend
events where solar system objects or double stars are viewd vs. a
telescope at dark sky parties, but instead to determine which of the
various makes, f-ratios, objective sizes, and optical design of
refractors would give me the most all around satisfying image. I am sure
others would be interested in the same thing. For example, an RR (which
I doubt anyone in Arizona has) is reported to have a much sharper image
than a Synta, but just how noticeable is it? We all read Jack's report
of his new 100mm ED, but just how does it compare to other refractors?
We not know, and written descriptions are difficult to visualize. What I
want to use it for is not the issue. Whether it should be an issue is
valid, but I am already aware of this and am not seeking advice on
whether to get a refractor or reflector.
It is a given that I will get a refractor. Determining which refractor
would give me the best all around image can only be truly determined by
a comparison of various refractors at the same time on the same object
or part of sky. Would a Asto-Physics be best? I do not see how the cost
can justify it. Would an f6 be good, or would an f8.3 give a
significantly better image to justify a significant loss in field of
view? How much does an f6 of the achromat design degrade the image of
the the moon or planets compared to an apo? Yes, there is some color,
but would I, or others, think it that objectionable to justify the cost
of an apo? One might be able to make a statement, but individual case
statements are difficult to visualize. let's see, for example, in
actuality how an Orion f6 compares to an A-P (or other make) of the same
f-ratio or near f-ratio. It may be stated that the figure on an A-P
refractor is better than an Orion, but just how noticeable is it on the
actual image? One may be able to make a statement, but statements are
hard to visualize. It may be that after using a refractor extensively I
may be very unhappy with one, but that is another issue. However, I must
say that the dark sky view through Jacks 80mm Orion refractor at the
last Messier marathon was great.
Stan
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
Other related posts:
