I’m not sure of the point of your reply?
I was replying to your
I think the "drop bombs and fight" is simply a myth
Because it's a game, players can choose when to engage in near perfectPilots have to set those conditions up, real ones and gamers.
tactical conditions.
There's no staff officer complaining they haven't done the job they wereI very much doubt a staff officer would complain if enemy fighters were engaged
given.
Because the game can't cope with many objects everyone knows where the strikeWhat is your point? I made that point yesterday when discussing how the servers
missions are going.
There's no near total air superiority by the Allies.Depends on the server numbers, sometimes there is a balance, often there’s not,
In Real Life they'd often be engaging in a less than perfect tacticalThis always happens to you, you need to reduce the chances of this happening
situation.
In Real Life they'd have a lot more clouds and layered clouds which wouldSome servers have so much cloud, and multiple layers, we don’t bother going on
lead to more random close encounters rather than high energy bounces.
In Real Life they'd have a Radar Controller telling them what was nearby ifThere is radar coverage on most maps, at least around airfields and targets,
they were high enough (Squadron ORBs always miss this stuff out).
I can't do much about the lack of a command chain, but I have asked the devs
for realistic radar and we're getting the Mission Commander stuff sometime.
I really, really want the DCS layered clouds...
56RAF_phoenix
On 30/04/2021 20:00, Lee Fisher (Redacted sender l.fisher for DMARC) wrote:
On 30 Apr 2021, at 4:22 pm, 56RAF_phoenix <phoenix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:phoenix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I think the "drop bombs and fight" is simply a myth
You do a great disservice to the aggresivness of the RAF Fighter pilots who
flew against the Nazis.
While reading Shores & Thomas 2nd TAF Volume 1, firstly I was surprised by
how many, almost exclusively, Fighter sweeps and Armed Recce sorties were
carried out following D-Day by Spitfires and Mustangs, the GA being mostly
being done by Typhoons and medium bombers, there were a very few occasions,
only 1 in June, such as the following, where Fighters did some ground attack
and saw enemy fighters before target.
20 June ’44.
19 Squadron Mustangs sent to bomb marshalling yards at Rambouillet, before
the attack could be made 16 Fw190’s of III./JG54 were seen over Dreux, bombs
were dropped so the Mustangs could give battle. 2 190’s were shot down and 6
damaged for the loss of one Mustang, the pilot bailed and evaded capture.
There are numerous accounts of Spitfire IX's and Mustang III's engaging
enemy fighters after strafing ground targets or bombing, even though they
would still have the bomb shackles fitted!
The emphasis seems to have been that the enemy fighters were a real threat
"immediately" but also, they had the potential to be a future threat to all
allied aircraft so should be destroyed.
Witch
, with perhaps the exception of the P-38 at 25k+ feet. Because only a very
foolish attacker would turn with us and lose energy.
Plus, as Roke says, the Tempest is pretty poor already up high. But the
P-38 becomes a liability low down unless the enemy is stupid again.
We've often got caught on the way off target in previously bombed-up P-38s,
less often in Tempests.
We had a very memorable engagement in bombed-up P-38s a few months ago when
I suggested going right over the top of the front line on a snowy map. I
think we were massively in contrail and the axis fighters all had to grab
to get to us, but couldn't resist. The moment one of us lost concentration
on maximum climb, they were onto us (I think we lost Stickz first). Then
his lead turned a bit, lost height, and they were onto him. I had
chandelled and my wingman (Bo?) almost lost it, I jettisoned bombs, kept
straight and just about avoided a flank attacker who then dropped out.
We made it home eventually, but not to target. I was a failure of a
mission, but very instructive.
It seems to me that if you're intent on a fighter-bombing mission, if you
want to get there safely you're better off in a P-38, if you want to get
back safely you're better off in a Tempest.
So we'd better have tactics to mitigate the risky end.
I have some strategy thoughts that I won't share with the Blaggards!
56RAF_phoenix
On 30/04/2021 13:42, Colin (Redacted sender bart_56 for DMARC) wrote:
I was really trying to ascertain why warnings are not acted on, comms,
etc. How cooperative the two squads were getting in missions etc.
We have had this discussion a few times, but doing attacks on objectives
are difficult at the best of times whether you go low or medium altitude.
It’s the way the maps are designed that congregates the meeting of the the
two forces. I don’t think there is an easy answer.
Close escort to bombers at medium to low alt is extremely hard, how many
times when engaged has that really worked that the bombers and all escort
make it home?
If we take the last two scenarios we were involved in, the first one we
provide high (22’000ft) cover to a low level attack. We fended off 4 high
fighters, but unfortunately the low close escort lost 3 fighters to 2 low
fighters the bombers made it home.
The second scenario we were the enemy, the medium to high alt close escort
to the medium alt ground attackers. The escort lost 3 out of 4 aircraft
and the ground attackers lost 2 out of 4, to 3 high enemy aircraft.
The key on both of these has been altitude the higher the altitude the
more options you have. There are other things we could also bring into
this to off set the altitude advantage etc, but I would be writing forever
lol.
There is not a “I always win button” solution I am afraid, and one method
might work one but not the next. I am a believer to try and put yourself
in the best possible position that gives you more options and take the
options away from the enemy. Above all team work gives you the most
options, but harder to control as the team gets bigger, as everyone might
not be as switched on to the same level.
Colin
On 30 Apr 2021, at 11:36, dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Working out the best way to fly with Java is a challenge at present.
For a fast, fighter-bomber mission like on Sunday, there is a danger at
present that all they will do is end up being sacrificial decoys if
attacked by higher enemies. And also add some confusion for the rest of
us as to what's going on.
Perhaps - for that mission profile - asking Java to fly ahead and light
up the radar at a different, but nearby target might be a useful
alternative approach?
As for the 'attacked by higher enemies' bit, we all know the Tempest at
25k+ with 2000lbs of bombs is a dog. But if we had been that high when
the Blaggards first spotted us, things would have gone differently. At
the least, we would have had more options - and no real need of direct
escort anyway. There's no implied criticism there BTW, had I been leading
on Sunday I probably wouldn't have gone that high either.
When flying bombers, or for a low level attack, having Java fly closer
escort on the other hand could still be the right way to go. I'm all for
flying together, but if the limitations we've seen recently aren't likely
to change we just have to take that into account.
Roke
On Friday, 30 April 2021, 10:05:18 BST, 56RAF_phoenix
<phoenix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:phoenix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
You're mostly right there Colin, but to labour the points:
I'm not sure language is really a problem... their English is rather
better than my Dutch!
Close escort is really, really hard, as Bo and I found when we trivially
massacred an escorted Ju52 a couple of weeks ago.
But they have a real formation discipline problem, for example one of
them got lost or something and was coming in late, so when I called my
warning I wasn't sure and nor were they. I don't think our relationship
as squads is close enough for joint training yet.
As to the Reverb G2 spotting, I haven't got good settings yet (another
email to follow in due course), for example the murky conditions on
CombatBox last night were dreadful for me. They also had the "moving
cockpit" problem and I talked them through that later, though one of
them seemed to know the answer anyway.
Having taken over when Cina had to leave, I was kind of in "bomber
survival" mode because we don't often do bombed-up Tempests. It's very
different because with rear gunners, I set mine to long-distance and get
plenty of warning. So I wasn't playing to our strength, which would have
been to ditch the bombs. But that would still have left us with an
energy disadvantage. So I think turning South was right, but I should
have taken the time to make it a tac-turn so that Roke & Stickz were
abreast. Then ditched the bombs and extended to equalise energy.
Either way, most of Java would have been dead by then. So you could
argue that it would have been just as good to continue to target and get
at least some military objective.
I know this will sound brutal, but the escort really have to be able to
look after themselves because bombers/bombed-up fighters will never have
enough energy to come to their immediate help.
You may remember you killed a few of us at low level a few months ago on
the deck in a similar way and I proposed an unconventional flight layout
to provide better outward coverage. That's pretty much all bombers can
offer to the escort.
56RAF_phoneix
