Yes, I believe that we are very near to being in accord on that point.My apologies for not having notiedsome of your earlier postings on this "meaning/use" business. I am new on this Board and, still haven't deduced why, but some posting have been sent to spam
On Sep 28, 2009, at 7:12 PM, Glen Sizemore wrote:
--- On Mon, 9/28/09, CJ <castalia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:From: CJ <castalia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [Wittrs] Re: Wittgenstein's meaning is use. To: wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Monday, September 28, 2009, 5:03 PM Folks,Errr...that was my point. WEB VIEW: http://tinyurl.com/ku7ga4 TODAY: http://alturl.com/whcf 3 DAYS: http://alturl.com/d9vz 1 WEEK: http://alturl.com/yeza GOOGLE: http://groups.google.com/group/Wittrs YAHOO: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wittrs/ FREELIST: //www.freelists.org/archive/wittrs/09-2009
