Totally agree about right left staggers - its probably better to encourage the ped to push the button and stop rather than take a chance which a left right stagger encourages - but I doubt anybody has studied the relative accident rates. Dick > -----Original Message----- > From: David Overton [SMTP:dtoverton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 11 June 2004 18:57 > To: tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [TCUG] Re: 'Wacky ideas' > > Mervyn > > Thanks for that. I'm sorry I didn't make myself clear - I fully endorse > your opinion about the efficiency which staggered crossings bring, but the > advantage is in the separate signalling, not in the physical stagger. > With > near-side indicators it is only moderately wacky to consider retaining the > separate signalling of each carriageway but without physically staggering > them. All the efficiency advantages with a much neater layout. Other > people do it ... > > And another thing - can we kill once and for all the view of some safety > auditors that all staggers should be left-right! Let's hear it for the > right-left stagger! Crossing on the approach side is then at the stop > line. > Crossing on the exit side far enough from the junction for traffic to be > travelling straight and to give the peds sight of them. More efficient > and > safer. > > David > > -----Original Message----- > From: tcug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tcug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On > Behalf Of mervyn.hallworth@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: 11 June 2004 17:21 > To: tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [TCUG] Re: 'Wacky ideas' > > > > > David, > > Thanks for helping to put many of these issues into context. I was going > to mention the way the Australians use red arrows - in the opposite sense > to the way we use filter arrows (i.e. they stop right-turners using an > amber arrow then a red arrow - after which they drop the red arrow off!), > but I thought we were probably still 2 decades away from that in UK! > > Not sure about your comment about staggered crossings - we certainly don't > put them in for any 'see through' reasons at junctions - we put them in > largely for efficiency reasons (as a form of parallel peds they help > minimise the dreaded congestion!). I think that Birmingham have recently > 'outlawed' all-round peds in favour of staggered crossings on the basis of > congestion - care to comment Paul? > > I know staggers are not popular with 'planners', but I really do believe > they can be more meaningful to pedestrians - in the sense that for each > crossing arm they can be more often faced with a clear-cut situation - > there's either 'traffic' or there's a 'green man'. I know things are never > that perfect, but contrast this with an (inefficient) all-red stage which > has a red man up for so much of the cycle (including the inevitable period > to protect peds against non-existent left turners) that the red man signal > can become meaningless. > > Mervyn > 0113 2476750 > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > > The information in this email (and any attachment) may be for the > intended recipient only. If you know you are not the intended recipient, > please do not use or disclose the information in any way and please > delete this email (and any attachment) from your system. > > Service of legal documents is not accepted by email > ________________________________________________________________________ > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about > the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about > the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug ----------------------------------------------------------- A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug