[TCUG] Re: 'Wacky ideas'
- From: mervyn.hallworth@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 16:58:11 +0100
You'd probably have quite a bit of support on ASLs, and possibly for
flashing amber.
But as far as red/amber is concerned (currently being reviewed in UK
anyway) I have to say that I can see little or no case for removing it.
Without it signal lost time would undoubtedly increase, coordination on
short links would become much more uncertain /inefficient for drivers, and
it would be a nightmare for peds walking 'late' in the clearance period. On
its own I'm not sure that 'the Europe consistency argument' is a good
enough reason for us to change - in any case they use red/amber in Germany.
Mervyn
0113 2476750
________________________________________________________________________
The information in this email (and any attachment) may be for the
intended recipient only. If you know you are not the intended recipient,
please do not use or disclose the information in any way and please
delete this email (and any attachment) from your system.
Service of legal documents is not accepted by email
________________________________________________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
Other related posts:
