In a message dated 3/10/2004 11:11:27 AM Pacific Standard Time, Chris.Cheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes: When it comes to BC, I have to agree with Simon..... http://home.graffiti.net/3par/si1.jpg Since you mentioned it is not a speculation, I presume you can give us some real example of systems with proper stackup failing ESD test and when BC is added it magically passed ? Care to share the information ? ************ Your reference to Simon, who states "This topic is absolutely....DREADFUL," as well as your "real example" and "magically passed" comments have clearly negative (and offensive) connotations. As any professional consultant knows, it would be folly (as well as illegal) to disclose details on any particular design of a client. However, not by magic, but through well thought out design techniques, I have successfully integrated solutions for SI, radiated emissions, and ESD problems to rectify multiple hardware designs (on the order of 50-60 different designs out of hundreds of designs) for Nokia, Boeing, Aerojet Electronics, NASA (Tayco Engineering), Hewlett-Packard (Systems Div.), Intel (Communications Div.), an international set-top box manufacturer, a major DNA analysis firm (SF Bay area), United Technologies, and multiple other major firms, not to mention salvaging two separate >$100-million programs by modeling, analysis, and demonstrating corrective actions using BC concepts. Designs within these companies were aided in the correction of susceptibilities by the use of BC (both licensed versions and near-equivalent versions prior to their availability). As far as knowledge of the benefits and detriments (basicly cost) of designs incorporating BC, I am confident I have a distinct experience advantage over you (Chris). I used BC concepts in many edge-cutting military and aerospace designs before Zycon developed and patented the superior process technology needed to reliably mass produce same. I contacted them in 1989 to explore their capabilities, verify through my own tests (in my own lab), and critique their fabrication and test results. I ended up including their product (ZBC-2000) in my seminars and tutorials that covered the US, Europe, and parts of Asia. Because of my background in advanced military, aerospace, and satellite systems, I was aware more than 35 years ago of many beneficial attributes of the BC concept that still haven't been widely disseminated. I gather, perhaps incorrectly, that your experience (Chris) is only commercial and does not penetrate the glass ceiling of much more difficult design problems shared by many aerospace companies. FYI, I only comment to the SI List infrequently as I have many other things to occupy my time. I never make statements on the SI List that I have not already proven to myself through both analysis and test to be valid (unless I clearly state it as a concept for exploration). Nor do I deem it necessary (for me or anyone else) to take the time to provide a bibliography of references for verification of the offered comments. Any such requirement (or request) discourages the rapid exchange of ideas, comments, and general discussion that the SI forum offers, and makes one NOT want to comment. I have in the past and still do urge all designers with an interest in a given topic/thread to read, absorb, and digest the comments, and then to THINK IT OUT FOR THEMSELVES as to the appropriateness for their particular designs. Most will find that some of the offered information is not applicable to their current needs, but might someday be. There. I think my steam is now released. Time to go trout fishing as the ice has broken up almost to the dam. My fishing buddy just called and says they are catching 18-22 inchers on dry flies and midges. This thread is DONE for me. Good Engineering to all. Mike Michael L. Conn Owner/Principal Consultant Mikon Consulting Cell: (408)821-9843 *** Serving Your Needs with Technical Excellence *** ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu