Doug, What was the source of the fast-risetime ESD event you measured? In my lab, I've measured fairly slow stuff in the 10s and sometimes 100s of nanasecond risetimes. This was on a pretty slow scope so perhaps I was missing something? Anyway, we reworked some of the design with the idea of 10-20 MHz in mind (1/2*risetime) and it fixed the problem. However, one thing is for sure, ESD is a chaotic event and I am sure it registers itself all over the spectrum in many guises. Thanks for the food for thought on ESD. ----->Chris At 06:05 PM 3/3/2004 -0800, Doug Smith wrote: >Hi Charles and the "gang," > >At the risk of a few dozen "out-of-office" messages, I think I can add >to the discussion. As chance would have it, the Technical Tidbit I >posted this month on my website ( http://emcesd.com ) talks about >chassis coupling for a low frequency case, but at the bottom of the >article are three links to other articles on my website bearing on >this subject. One specifically addresses ESD coupling to a board over >a metal plane and shows that "single point" grounding of the board >sets up a nice parallel plate capacitor (board and metal plane) and >inductor (the short connection) resonant circuit with bad results. In >that case the ESD was applied to the metal not the board. > >Low voltage ESD events have the fastest risetimes. At the risk of >oversimplication I like to think of it in this way: At high voltages >(~10 kV) the arc length is long and the electrons collide with air >molecules on the way across. The electrons are scattered by the >collisions and are pulled in by the field over time resulting in a >risetime of tens of nanoseconds. However, for a low voltge discharge >(200-500V) the arc length is small, much less scattering occurs and >the risetime is fast. As Charles said, I have observed risetimes of 80 >ps and that was the scope limit (about 10 years ago at Bell Labs in >Murray Hill, NJ). It is a handy, if oversimplified, way of thinking >about it. The di/dt is much greater for low voltage events than for >high voltage events. > >I have been planning on simulating a circuit board over a ground plate >for some time now. Maybe now is the time to perfect the models (I >prefer to make up my own models so I know how they work) and get the >simulation going (maby a paper in it). At least it will give all the >computing power I mentioned in a posting a few days ago a workout. I >expect the simulation to have the equivalent of more than 10000 >elements/components in it for the transient simulation. > >Doug ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu