[sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
- From: "Chris Hanrahan" <chris.hanrahan@xxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:40:05 -0700
Would Tom, Lynn or Paul please vote on the issue below?
Thanks.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of saguaroastro@xxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 8:16 AM
To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
Just need one more Board member to weigh in and it's done....
---- "Prause wrote:
> Now that we have moved and are voting, I vote yes, that we spend the
> $300 for the 3 portajohns. Mitch
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Hanrahan
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 7:00 PM
> To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
>
> Mitch, are you moving we move on this or are you suggesting the actual
> movement? I think you're suggesting the actual movement; therefore, I
> second the movement that we spend the $300 for port-a-johns.
> Many movements regarding future movements.
>
> Does anyone see why we could not vote on this via e-mail? I do not find
> any such information in the Constitution and Bylaws.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Prause, Mitchell F. (Spec Cas Risk Svcs UW Suppo)
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:58 AM
> To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
>
> OK, I'm game, I'll move that we spend the $300 so that we can vote on
> it. Mitch
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Polakis
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:12 AM
> To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
>
> ---- Rick Rotramel wrote:
> > I seem to recall a change made recently to the SAC constitution about
> > the Board being able to expend an unexpected expense with a majority
> > vote of the Board.
> >
> > I think the limit was less than $1000.00 for an expenditure without
> > the vote of the entire club. Or was it $500.00?
>
>
>
> Good catch, Rick. I am looking at the SAC Constitution now. It was
> last updated on March 26, 2010. In Article VIII: Moneys and Properties,
> it reads, "In the event of unforeseen or emergency circumstances, in
> support of previously approved activities, the board may approve
> spending up to a maximum total of $500, with notification of the
> membership at the next club meeting."
>
> So the Board may approve spending up to $500, and all that's required is
> a notification.
>
> Now, are we allowed to do this vote on the SAC Board e-mail list? If
> so, somebody should make a motion to spend the $300, and we can put if
> up for vote.
>
> Tom
>
> ************************************************************
> This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of
> addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged
> information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying,
> disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately
> by return e-mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies.
> ************************************************************
>
>
>
> ************************************************************
> This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of
addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying,
disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by
return e-mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies.
> ************************************************************
>
>
Other related posts:
