who dat? Just need one more Board member to weigh in and it's done.... > > > ---- "Prause wrote: > > Now that we have moved and are voting, I vote yes, that we spend the > > $300 for the 3 portajohns. Mitch > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Hanrahan > > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 7:00 PM > > To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes... > > > > Mitch, are you moving we move on this or are you suggesting the actual > > movement? I think you're suggesting the actual movement; therefore, I > > second the movement that we spend the $300 for port-a-johns. > > Many movements regarding future movements. > > > > Does anyone see why we could not vote on this via e-mail? I do not find > > any such information in the Constitution and Bylaws. > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > On Behalf Of Prause, Mitchell F. (Spec Cas Risk Svcs UW Suppo) > > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:58 AM > > To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes... > > > > OK, I'm game, I'll move that we spend the $300 so that we can vote on > > it. Mitch > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Polakis > > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:12 AM > > To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes... > > > > ---- Rick Rotramel wrote: > > > I seem to recall a change made recently to the SAC constitution about > > > the Board being able to expend an unexpected expense with a majority > > > vote of the Board. > > > > > > I think the limit was less than $1000.00 for an expenditure without > > > the vote of the entire club. Or was it $500.00? >