[sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...

  • From: Jack Jones <telescoper@xxxxxxx>
  • To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:55:26 -0700

who dat?
Just need one more Board member to weigh in and it's done....
>
>
> ---- "Prause wrote:
> > Now that we have moved and are voting, I vote yes, that we spend the
> > $300 for the 3 portajohns.  Mitch
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Hanrahan
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 7:00 PM
> > To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
> >
> > Mitch, are you moving we move on this or are you suggesting the actual
> > movement?  I think you're suggesting the actual movement; therefore, I
> > second the movement that we spend the $300 for port-a-johns.
> > Many movements regarding future movements.
> >
> > Does anyone see why we could not vote on this via e-mail?  I do not find
> > any such information in the Constitution and Bylaws.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Prause, Mitchell F. (Spec Cas Risk Svcs UW Suppo)
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:58 AM
> > To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
> >
> > OK, I'm game, I'll move that we spend the $300 so that we can vote on
> > it.   Mitch
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:sac-board-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Polakis
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:12 AM
> > To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [sac-board] Re: SAC Board: Meeting Minutes...
> >
> > ---- Rick Rotramel wrote:
> > > I seem to recall a change made recently to the SAC constitution about
> > > the Board being able to expend an unexpected expense with a majority
> > > vote of the Board.
> > >
> > > I think the limit was less than $1000.00 for an expenditure without
> > > the vote of the entire club. Or was it $500.00?
>



Other related posts: